- Ahmed Alshmakhy (University of Calgary) | Brij B. Maini (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- January 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 60 - 65
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 4.6 Natural Gas
- Viscosity, Foamy Oil, Heavy Oil
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,626 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Foamy-oil viscosity is a controversial topic among researchers regarding what happens to the oil viscosity when the solution gas starts coming out of solution because of decreasing pressure and the released gas starts migrating with the oil in the form of dispersed gas bubbles. For conventional oils, below the true bubblepoint pressure, the oil viscosity increases as the gas freely evolves from the oil. For foamy oils, it has been suggested that the apparent oil viscosity remains relatively constant or perhaps declines slightly between the true bubblepoint and a characteristic lower pressure, called pseudobubblepoint, which is the pressure at which the gas starts separating from the oil. Below this pressure, the viscosity increases, reaching the dead-oil value at atmospheric pressure. However, it is a well-known fact in dispersion rheology that the viscosity of dispersion is higher than the viscosity of the continuous phase. Therefore, the concept of foamy-oil viscosity being lower than the oil viscosity is counterintuitive. It is likely that the apparent viscosity for flow of foamy oil in porous media is not the true dispersion viscosity because of the size of dispersed bubbles being comparable to the pore sizes.
This study investigates this issue by measuring the foamy-oil viscosity under varied conditions. The effect of several parameters, such as flow rate, gas volume fraction, and type of viscometer employed, on foamy-oil viscosity was evaluated experimentally. Three different viscosity-measurement techniques, including Cambridge falling-needle viscometer, capillary tube, and a slimtube packed with sand, were used to measure the apparent viscosity of gas-in-oil dispersions. The results show that the type of measuring device used has a significant effect. The results obtained with Cambridge falling-needle viscometer correlate better with the observed behaviour in the sand-packed slimtube than the capillary viscometer results. Overall, the apparent viscosity of foamy oil was found to be similar to live-oil viscosity for a range of gas volume fractions.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||6|
Albartamani, N.S. 2000. Experimental Studies on "Foamy Oil"Phenomena. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Bauget, F., Langevin, D., and Lenormand, R. 2001. DynamicSurface Properties of Asphaltenes and Resins at the Oil-Air Interface. J.Colloid Interface Sci. 239 (2): 501-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7566.
Bora, R. 1998. Cold Production of Heavy Oils: AnExperimental Investigation of Foamy Oil Flow in Porous Media. PhD thesis,University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Claridge, E.L. 1994. A Proposed Model and Mechanism forAnomalous Foamy Heavy Oil Behaviour. Paper SPE 29243 presented at the availablefrom SPE, Richardson, Texas.
de Mirabal, M., Gordillo, R., Rojas, G., Rodriguez, H.,and Huerta, M. 1996. Impact of Foamy Oil Mechanism on the Hamaca OilReserves Orinoco Belt-Venezuela. Paper SPE 36140 presented at the SPE LatinAmerica/ Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad,23-26 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36140-MS.
Fisher, D.B., Espidel, J., Huerta, M., Randall, L., and Goldman, J. 1999. Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Tool for the Study ofFoamy Oil Behavior for an Extra-Heavy Crude Oil. T2 /Viscosity Correlation withRespect to Pressure. Transport Porous Media 35 (2):189-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1006578105518.
Goodarzi, N., Bryan, J.L., Mai, A.T., and Kantzas, A.2005. Heavy Oil Fluid Testing With Conventional and Novel Techniques. Paper SPE97803 presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations andHeavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1-3 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97803-MS.
Heidemann, R.A., Jeje, A.A., and Mohtadi, F. 2005. AnIntroduction to the Properties of Fluids and Solids. Calgary, Alberta: TheUniversity of Calgary Press.
Henriot, V., Duret, E., Heintze, E., and Courbot, A.2002. Contrôle en production polyphasique : application aux écoulements àbouchons. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP 57 (1): 87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2002006.
Huerta, M., Otero, C., Rico, A., Jimenez, I., de Mirabal, M.,and Rojas, G. 1996. Understanding Foamy Oil Mechanisms for Heavy OilReservoirs During Primary Production. Paper SPE 36749 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36749-MS.
Islam, M.R. and Chakma, A. 1990. Mechanics of Bubble Flow inHeavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 20070 presented at the SPE California RegionalMeeting, Ventura, California, USA, 4-6 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20070-MS.
Maini, B.B., Sarma, H.K., and George, A.E. 1993. Significance ofFoamy-Oil Behavior in Primary Production of Heavy Oils. J Can PetTechnol 32 (9): 50-54.
Marsden, S.S. and Khan, S.A. 1966. The Flow of Foam ThroughShort Porous Media And Apparent Viscosity Measurements. SPE J. 6 (1): 17-25. SPE-1319-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1319-PA.
Smith, G.E. 1988. Fluid Flow and Sand Production in Heavy Oil Reservoirsunder Solution-Gas Drive. SPE Prod Eng 3 (2): 169-177.SPE-15094-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15094-PA.
Taitel, Y. 1986. Stability of Severe Slugging. Int. J. MultiphaseFlow 12 (2): 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(86)90026-1.
Weatherill, B., Seto, A.C., Gupta, S.K., and Çobo, L.2005. Cold Heavy Oil Production at Patos-Marinza, Albania. Paper SPE 97992presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy OilSymposium, Calgary, 1-3 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97992-MS.