Modeling Facility-Expansion Options Under Uncertainty
- Christopher Jablonowski (The University of Texas at Austin) | Hariharan Ramachandran (The University of Texas at Austin) | Leon Lasdon (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
- Publication Date
- December 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 239 - 247
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation
- Uncertainty analysis, Flexibility, Integrated asset models, Expansion options
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 375 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
During the concept comparison and selection phase of capital projects, decision makers compare development options and select one option to carry forward to detailed engineering. This effort is often complicated by uncertainty in one or more of the critical inputs. Therefore, project teams typically investigate how different assumptions about the uncertainty influence optimal decisions. In cases where initial investment decisions are costly to change, the analysis of facility flexibility increases in importance. The goal is to find the optimal balance between initial capacity and the allocation of space and other resources for future expansion. This paper reports the results of a research project in which the authors develop an integrated asset model for a hypothetical deepwater asset and use the model to investigate various aspects of facility design under uncertainty. The method produces estimates for the optimal initial capacity, the likelihood of expansion, the expected size of expansion, and the willingness to pay for the option to expand. The approach is systematic; the model solves quickly and, thus, enables a wide scope of uncertainty analysis. The graphical output is intuitive and facilitates communication between the facility engineer, subsurface engineers, and management.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Awasthi, A., Sankaran, S., Nikolaou, M., Saputelli, L., and Mijares,G. 2007. Closing the Gap Between Reservoir Modeling and ProductionOptimization. Paper SPE 107463 presented at the Digital Energy Conference andExhibition, Houston, 11-12 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107463-MS.
Babajide, A., de Neufville, R., and Cardin, M.-A. 2009.Integrated Method for Designing Valuable Flexibility in Oil DevelopmentProjects. SPE Proj Fac & Const 4 (2): 3-12.SPE-122710-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122710-PA.
Begg, S., Bratvold, R., and Campbell, J. 2002. The Value ofFlexibility in Managing Uncertainty in Oil and Gas Investments. Paper SPE 77586presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77586-MS.
Begg, S.H., Bratvold, R.B., and Campbell, J.M. 2001.Improving Investment Decisions Using a Stochastic Integrated Asset Model. PaperSPE 71414 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, NewOrleans, 30 September-3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71414-MS.
Bilderbeck, M.G. and Beck, I.V. 2005. Using Integrated Project Models toEvaluate Field Development Options. Paper SPE 93554 presented at the SPE MiddleEast Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain, 12-15 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93554-MS.
Bratvold, R.B. and Begg, S.H. 2008. I Would Rather Be Vaguely Right thanPrecisely Wrong: A New Approach to Decision Making in the Petroleum Explorationand Production Industry. AAPG Bull. 92 (10): 1373-1392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/06040808070.
Coats, B.K., Fleming, G.C., Watts, J.W., Rame, M., and Shiralkar, G.S.2004. A Generalized Wellbore and Surface Facility Model, Fully Coupled to aReservoir Simulator. SPE Res Eval & Eng 7 (2): 132-142.SPE-87913-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87913-PA.
Cullick, A.S., Cude, R.G., and Tarman, M. 2007. Optimizing FieldDevelopment Concepts for Complex Offshore Production Systems. Paper SPE 108562presented at the Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, 4-7 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108562-MS.
Cullick, A.S., Heath, D., Narayanan, K., April, J., and Kelly, J. 2003. Optimizing Multiple-Field Scheduling and Production StrategyWith Reduced Risk. Paper SPE 84239 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84239-MS.
Ettehadtavakkol, A., Jablonowski, C.J., and Lake, L.W. 2009. GasStorage Facility Design Under Uncertainty. Paper SPE 123987 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/123987-MS.
Ghorayeb, K., Holmes, J.A., and Torrens, R. 2005. FieldPlanning Using Integrated Surface/Subsurface Modeling. Paper SPE 92381presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom ofBahrain, 12-15 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/92381-MS.
Hollund, K., Kolbjornsen, O., Syversveen, A.R., Lie, T., and Jorstad,A. 2007. Using "Fast Models" for Selecting the Right Decision--A NorwegianNorth Sea Case Study. Paper SPE 110321 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110321-MS.
Iyer, R.R., Grossmann, I.E., Vasantharajan, S., and Cullick, A.S.1998. Optimal Planning and Scheduling of Offshore Oil Field InfrastructureInvestment and Operations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 (4):1380-1397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie970532x.
Jablonowski, C. and Strachan, A. 2009. Cost Modelling of Deepwater Oil andGas Facilities: A Case Study of Spars and Tension Leg Platforms. Ships andOffshore Structures 4 (1): 69-76.
Jablonowski, C., Wiboonkij-Arphakul, C., and Neuhold, M. 2008.Estimating the Cost of Errors in Estimates Used During Concept Selection.SPE Proj Fac & Const 3 (1): 1-6. SPE-110191-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110191-PA.
Jafarizadeh, B. and Bratvold, R.B. 2009. Real Options Analysis in PetroleumExploration and Production: A New Paradigm in Investment Analysis. Paper SPE121426 presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 8-11June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/121426-MS.
Lasdon, L., Coffman, P.E. Jr., MacDonald, R., McFarland, J.W., and Sepehrnoori, K. 1986. Optimal Hydrocarbon Reservoir Production Policies.Oper. Res. 34 (1): 40-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.1.40.
Litvak, M.L., Gane, B.R., Williams, G. et al. 2007. Field DevelopmentOptimization Technology. Paper SPE 106426 presented at the SPE ReservoirSimulation Symposium, Houston, 26-28 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106426-MS.
Lund, M.W. 2000. Valuing Flexibility in Offshore Petroleum Projects.Annals of Operations Research 99 (1): 325-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1019284119505.
McFarland, J.W., Lasdon, L., and Loose, V. 1984. Development Planningand Management of Petroleum Reservoirs Using Tank Models and NonlinearProgramming. Oper. Res. 32 (2): 270-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.32.2.270.
Onwunalu, J.E., Litvak, M.L., Durlofsky, L.J., and Aziz, K. 2008.Application of Statistical Proxies to Speed Up Field Development OptimizationProcedures. Paper SPE 117323 presented at the Abu Dhabi International PetroleumExhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 3-6 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/117323-MS.
Purwar, S., Jablonowski, C.J., and Nguyen, Q.P. 2010. A Method ForIntegrating Response Surfaces Into Optimization Models With Real Options: ACase in Gas Flooding. Paper SPE 129566 presented at the SPE HydrocarbonEconomics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas, 8-9 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129566-MS.
Sarma, P., Chen, W.H., Durlofsky, L.J., and Aziz, K. 2008. ProductionOptimization With Adjoint Models Under Nonlinear Control-State Path InequalityConstraints. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (2): 326-339.SPE-99959-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99959-PA.
Vasantharajan, S., Al-Hussainy, R., and Heinemann, R.F. 2006. ApplyingOptimization Technology in Reservoir Management. J Pet Technol 58 (5): 82-88. SPE 87836. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87836-MS.
Walkup, G.W. and Ligon, B.J. 2006. The Good, Bad, and Ugly ofStage-Gate Project Management Process as Applied in the Oil and Gas Industry.Paper SPE 102926 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102926-MS.