Using the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE/SEG PRMS To Evaluate Unconventional Resources
- Phillip B. Chan (Chance Petroleum Limited) | John Etherington (PRA International) | Roberto Aguilera (Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Economics & Management
- Publication Date
- April 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 119 - 127
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.7.6 Reserves Classification, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology
- Unconventional resources, Utica Shale, Barnette shale, Tight gas, PRMS
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,786 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
It is the intention of the SPE/World Petroleum Council (WPC)/American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)/ Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (SPEE)/ Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) to provide a consistent approach to estimating petroleum quantities, evaluating development projects, and presenting results within a comprehensive classification framework. The reserves and resources definitions and application guidelines are designed to be applicable to both conventional and unconventional petroleum accumulations, regardless of their in-place characteristics, the extraction method applied, or the degree of processing required to yield a marketable product.
The fact that unconventional resources are usually pervasive throughout a large area and are not significantly affected by hydrodynamic influences may require different approaches in evaluation. Assessments may include an increased sampling density to define uncertainty of in-place volumes and the variations in quality of reservoir and of hydrocarbons and their detailed spatial distribution for the design of specialized extraction methods.
This paper summarizes the special problems in the estimation and evaluation of shale gas. However, similar procedures can be used for other unconventional resources. The material is largely drawn from the soon to be published SPE Application Guidelines to the PRMS, supplemented with illustrations from actual field examples.
The rapidly advancing exploitation of unconventional resources has opened up many development opportunities, especially in North America. Shale gas and bitumen have already caused major impact on energy supply. We anticipate these opportunities will expand rapidly throughout the world. Achieving a better understanding of the special problems in unconventional-resources evaluation will help us build on PRMS to develop a more consistent approach to classification and categorization, accounting for unique project risks and uncertainties.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Aguilera, R. 1978. Log Analysis of Gas-Bearing Fracture Shales in the SaintLawrence Lowlands of Quebec. Paper SPE 7445 presented at the SPE Annual FallTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 1-3 October http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7445-MS.
Aguilera, R. 2010. Flow Units: From Conventional to Tight Gas to Shale GasReservoirs. Paper SPE 132845 presented at the SPE Trinidad and Tobago EnergyResources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad, 27-30 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132845-MS.
Aguilera, R. and Harding, T. 2007. State-of-the-Art of Tight Gas SandsCharacterization and Production Technology. Paper CIPC 2007-208 presented atthe Petroleum Society's 8th CIPC/58th Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 12-14June.
Arps, J.J. 1945. Analysis of Decline Curves. In Petroleum Development andTechnology 1945, Vol. 160, SPE-945228-G, 228-247. New York: Transactions ofthe American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, AIME.
Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M.F. 1959. Applied Petroleum ReservoirEngineering. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Davis, T.B. 1984. Subsurface Pressure Profiles in Gas Saturated Basins. InElmworth: Case Study of a Deep Basin Gas Field, ed. J. Masters, No. 38,189-203. Tulsa, Oklahoma: AAPG Special Volumes, AAPG.
Elliott, D.C. 2008. The Evaluation, Classification and Reporting ofUnconventional Resources. Paper SPE 114160 presented at the SPE UnconventionalReservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 10-12 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114160-MS.
Energy Information Agency (EIA). 1999. Natural Gas 1998 Issues and Trends.Chapter 3: Future Supply Potential of Natural Gas Hydrates. Annual ReportDOE/EIA-0560(98), Office of Oil and Gas, US DOE/EIA, Washington, DC (April1999), 73-90. http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/natural_gas_1998_issues_trends/pdf/chapter3.pdf.
Haskett, W.J. and Brown, P.J. 2005. Evaluation of Unconventional ResourcePlays. Paper SPE 96879 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96879-MS.
Hodgin, J.E. and Harrell, D.R. 2006. The Selection, Application, andMisapplication of Reservoir Analogs for the Estimation of Petroleum Reserves.Paper SPE 102505 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102505-MS.
Holditch, S.A. 2003. The Increasing Role of Unconventional Reservoirs in theFuture of the Oil and Gas Business. J Pet Technol 55 (11):Management, 34-37.
Junex. 2011. Natural gas in Québec, http://www.junex.ca/natural-gas-quebec(accessed June 2010).
Law, B.E. 2002. Basin-Centered Gas Systems. AAPG Bull. 86 (11): 1891-1919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/61EEDDB4-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
Perry, K. and Lee, J. 2007. Unconventional Gas Reservoirs--Tight Gas, CoalSeams, and Shales. Working Document of the NPC Global Oil & Gas Study,Topic Paper #29, Unconventional Gas Subgroup of the Technology Task Group, NPCCommittee on Global Oil and Gas, National Petroleum Council, Washington, DC (18July 2007), http://www.npc.org/Study_Topic_Papers/29-TTG-Unconventional-Gas.pdf.
Questerre Energy. 2009. Shale Gas 101, http://www.questerre.com/en/shale-gas/(accessed June 2010).
Schmoker, J.W. 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Assessment Concepts forContinuous Petroleum Accumulations. In Petroleum Systems and GeologicAssessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming,Colorado, and Utah, ed. Version 1, No. DDS-69-D, Chap. 13. Denver,Colorado: Digital Data Series, USGS.
Shanley, K.W., Cluff, R.M., and Robinson, J.W. 2004. Factorscontrolling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:Implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis.AAPG Bull. 88 (8): 1083-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/03250403051.
Southwestern Energy (SWN). 2011. Our Operations, http://www.swn.com/operations/Pages/default.aspx(accessed June 2010).
SPE/AAPG/WPC/SPEE/SEG. 2011. Guidelines for Application of the PetroleumResources Management System (November 2011). Richardson, Texas: Society ofPetroleum Engineers. http://www.spe.org/industry/docs/PRMS_Guidelines_Nov2011.pdf.
SPE/WPC/AAPG. 2000. Petroleum Resources Classification and Definitions, http://www.spe.org/industry/docs/Petroleum_Resources_Classification_2000.pdf(accessed June 2010).
SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE. 2007. Petroleum Resources Management System--2007, http://www.spe.org/industry/docs/Petroleum_Resources_Management_System_2007.pdf
Thériault, R. 2008. Regional Geochemical Evaluation of the Ordovician UticaShale Gas Play in Quebec. Paper Oral presentation presented at the AAPG EasternSection Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 11-15 October.
Trinnaman, J.A. and Clarke, A.W. ed. 2007. 2007 Survey of EnergyResources, 21st edition. London: World Energy Council. http://www.worldenergy.org/documents/ser2007_final_online_version_1.pdf.
Vassilellis, G.D. 2009. Roadmap to Monetization of Unconventional Resources.Paper SPE 121968 presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition,Amsterdam, 8-11 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/121968-MS.
Wang, F.P. and Reed, R.M. 2009. Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales.Paper SPE 124253 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124253-MS.
Wolff, J., Patel A., and Hoffman C. 2009. Natural Gas Sector Review:Examining the True Economic Cost of Shales 08.
Zhao, H., Givens, N.B., and Curtis, B. 2007. Thermal maturity of the BarnettShale determined from well-log analysis. AAPG Bull. 91 (4):535-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/10270606060.