Role of Stress Reorientation in the Success of Refracture Treatments in Tight Gas Sands
- Nicolas P. Roussel (University of Texas at Austin) | Mukul M. Sharma (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 346 - 355
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.8.1 Tight Gas
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 1,546 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The redistribution of stresses around a fractured vertical well has two sources: opening of propped fracture (mechanical effects) and production or injection of fluids in the reservoir (poroelastic effects). In this paper, the coupling of both phenomena was numerically modeled to quantify the extent of stress reorientation around fractured production wells. The results have been compared to field data from the Codell tight gas formation and analyzed for their impact on refracturing operations.
For previously fractured wells, a secondary fracture may be initiated perpendicular to the first fracture if a stress-reversal region is present. Altered-stress refracturing makes it possible to access zones of the reservoirs that are less depleted, thus increasing well production and reserves.
The results of our model quantitatively agree with previous tiltmeter measurements, confirming the existence of refracture reorientation in the Codell formation. The performance of refracturing treatments has been observed to be highly variable in the Wattenberg field (Colorado), with some wells underperforming while others are restored to initial production rates. Historical production from neighboring wells and initial fracture performance were shown to impact the potential benefits from refracturing predicted by the numerical model.
This paper introduces a 3D model, coupling mechanical and poroelastic stress reorientation used to interpret tiltmeter measurements and historical production in the Codell tight gas formation. Guidelines are drawn from the Wattenberg field case study that allow an operator to select candidate wells, choose the timing of the refracture operation in the life of the well, and evaluate the potential increase in well production after refracturing.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Barba, R.E. 2009. A Novel Approach to Identifying RefracturingCandidates and Executing Refracture Treatments in Multiple Zone Reservoirs.Paper SPE 125008 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125008-MS.
Barree, R.D., Cox, S.A., Barree, V.L., and Conway, M.W.2003. Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for MaterialSelection. Paper SPE 84306 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84306-MS.
Berchenko, I. and Detournay, E. 1997. Deviation of hydraulicfractures through poroelastic stress changes induced by fluid injection andpumping. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (6): 1009-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80010-X.
Biot, M.A. 1955. Theory of Elasticity and Consolidation for aPorous Anisotropic Solid. J. Appl. Phys. 26 (2): 182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1721956.
Elbel, J.L. and Mack, M.G. 1993. Refracturing: Observation andTheories. Paper SPE 25464 presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium,Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 21-23 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25464-MS.
Fisher, M.K., Heinze, J.R., Harris, C.D., Davidson, B.M.,Wright, C.A., and Dunn, K.P. 2004. Optimizing Horizontal CompletionTechniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping. Paper SPE90051 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston,26-29 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90051-MS.
Ketter, A.A., Daniels, J.L., Heinze, J.R., and Waters, G.2008. A Field Study Optimizing Completion Strategies for Fracture Initiation inBarnett Shale Horizontal Wells. SPE Prod & Oper 23 (3):373-378. SPE-103232-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103232-PA.
Liu, H., Lan, Z., Zhang, G., Hou, F., He, X., and Liu, X.2008. Evaluation of Refracture Reorientation in Both Laboratory and FieldScales. Paper SPE 112445 presented at the SPE International Symposium andExhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 13-15February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112445-MS.
Minner, W.A., Wright, C.A., Stanley, G.R., et al. 2002. Waterflood andProduction-Induced Stress Changes Dramatically Affect Hydraulic FractureBehavior in Lost Hills Infill Wells. Paper SPE 77536 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29September-2 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77536-MS.
Palmer, I.D. 1993. Induced Stresses Due to Propped HydraulicFracture in Coalbed Methane Wells. Paper SPE 25861 presented at the LowPermeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 26-28 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25861-MS.
Roussel, N.P. and Sharma, M.M. 2010. Quantifying TransientEffects in Altered-Stress Refracturing of Vertical Wells. SPE J. 15 (3): 770-782. SPE-119522-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119522-PA.
Roussel, N.P. and Sharma, M.M. 2011. Optimizing FractureSpacing and Sequencing in Horizontal-Well Fracturing. SPE Prod &Oper 26 (2): 173-184. SPE-127986-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127986-PA.
Siebrits, E., Elbel, J.L., Hoover, R.S., et al. 2000.Refracture Reorientation Enhances Gas Production in Barnett Shale Tight GasWells. Paper SPE 63030 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/63030-MS.
Siebrits, E., Elbel, J.L., Detourney, E., et al. 1998.Parameters Affecting Azimuth and Length of a Secondary Fracture During aRefracture Treatment. Paper SPE 48928 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/48928-MS.
Singh, V., Roussel, N.P., and Sharma, M.M. 2008. StressReorientation Around Horizontal Wells. Paper SPE 116092 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21-24 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116092-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., East, L., and Adams, D. 2004. GeoMechanicsAspects of Multiple Fracturing of Horizontal and Vertical Wells. Paper SPE86992 presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy OilSymposium and Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 16-18March http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/86992-MS.
Warpinski, N.R. and Branagan, P.T. 1989. Altered-StressFracturing. J Pet Technol 41 (9): 990-997. SPE-17533-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17533-PA.
Weng, X. and Siebrits, E. 2007. Effect of Production-InducedStress Field on Refracture Propagation and Pressure Response. Paper SPE 106043presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, CollegeStation, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106043-MS.
Wolhart, S.L., Zoll, M., McIntosh, G., and Weijers, L.2007. Surface Tiltmeter Mapping Shows Hydraulic Fracture Reorientation in theCodell Formation, Wattenberg Field, Colorado. Paper SPE 110034 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110034-MS.
Wright, C.A., Conant, R.A., Golich, G.M., Bondor, P.L., Murer,A.S., and Dobie, C.A. 1995. Hydraulic Fracture Orientation andProduction/Injection Induced Reservoir Stress Changes in Diatomite Waterfloods.Paper SPE 29625 presented at the Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield,California, USA, 8-10 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29625-MS.
Wright, C.A. and Conant, R.A. 1995. Hydraulic FractureReorientation in Primary and Secondary Recovery from Low-PermeabilityReservoirs. Paper SPE 30484 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Dallas, 22-25 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30484-MS.
Wright, C.A., Stewart, D.W., Emanuele, M.A., and Wright,W.W. 1994. Reorientation of Propped Refracture Treatments in the Lost HillsField. Paper SPE 27896 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, LongBeach, California, USA, 23-25 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/27896-MS.