Light- and Heavy-Solvent Impacts on Solvent-Aided-SAGD Process: A Low-Pressure Experimental Study
- Weiqiang Li (Texas A&M University) | Daulat Mamora (Texas A&M University) | Yamin Li (Occidental Petroleum Corporation)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- April 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 19 - 30
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
- SAGD, steam-assisted gravity drainage, solvent, Athabasca
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 918 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Coinjecting solvent with steam under steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) process to reduce the required steam amount for heavy-oil production has gained importance in recent years. The objective of this experimental study was to investigate the drainage mechanism of coinjecting light and heavy solvents to improve production performance.
A 2D cross-sectional low-pressure scaled physical model was constructed. The model represented a half-symmetry cross section of a typical SAGD drainage in the Athabasca formation. Using an infrared camera, we visualized and recorded expansion of the steam chamber and temperature distribution. The fluid injection rate, pressure, and temperature, and produced-liquid volumes were also recorded.
The results show that the relative condensation time of solvent and steam results in different production performances. Light solvent, delivered in the vapour phase to the entire fluid interface, reduces the bitumen viscosity along the whole vapour-chamber boundary, but it may build a thick gas blanket that may reduce the heat transfer from the high-temperature vapour chamber to the surrounding low-temperature bitumen. Coinjecting a suitable multicomponent-solvent mixture, including a heavy solvent, can enhance the production performance by altering the condensation dynamics of the light hydrocarbons.
The conclusions from this study can be used to design suitable solvent mixtures and coinjection strategies to deliver a higher production rate, higher recovery factor with lower cumulative steam required/oil ratio (CSOR), and lower cumulative energy required for oil production (CEOR) from SAGD performance.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Ayodele, O.R., Nasr., T.N., Beaulieu, G., and Heck, G. 2009. LaboratoryExperimental Testing and Development of an Efficient Low Pressure ES-SAGDProcess. J Can Pet Technol 48 (9): 54-61. JCPT Paper No.09-09-54. doi:10.2118/09-09-54.
Beach, I. and Purdy, D. 1997. Canadian Alliance for Heavy Oil Recovery.Paper SPE 37525 presented at the International Thermal Operation and Heavy OilSymposium, Bakersfield, California, USA, 10-12 February. SPE-37525-MS. doi: 10.2118/37525-MS.
Butler, R.M. 1997. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Calgary,Alberta: GravDrain Inc.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1991. A New Process (VAPEX) for RecoveringHeavy Oils Using Hot Water and Hydrocarbon Vapour. J Can Pet Technol 30 (1): 97-106.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1993a. In-Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oils andBitumen by Propane De-Asphalting: The VAPEX Process. Paper SPE 25452 presentedat the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 21-23March. doi:10.2118/25452-MS.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1993b. Recovery of Heavy Oils Using VaporizedHydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of the VAPEX Process. J Can PetTechnol 32 (6): 38-55.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I. 1998. Closed-loop Extraction Method for theRecovery of Heavy Oils and Bitumen Underlain By Aquifers: the VAPEX Process.J Can Pet Technol 37 (4): 41-50. JCPT Paper No.98-04-04. doi:10.2118/98-04-04.
Chung, K.H. and Butler, R.M. 1987. Geometrical Effect of Steam Injection onthe Formation of Emulsions in the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process.Paper PETSOC 87-38- 22 presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 7-10June. doi:10.2118/87-38-22.
Deng, X. 2005. Recovery Performance and Economics of Steam/Propane HybridProcess. Paper SPE 97760 presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International ThermalOperations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1-3 November. doi: 10.2118/97760-MS.
Farouq Ali, S.M. and Abad, B. 1976. Bitumen Recovery from Oil Sands, UsingSolvents in Conjunction with Steam. J Can Pet Technol 15(3): 80-90. JCPT Paper No. 76-03-11. doi: 10.2118/76-03-11.
Gates, I.D. 2007. Oil phase viscosity behavior in Expanding-SolventSteam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 59(1-2): 123-134. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2007.03.006.
Govind, P.A., Das, S., Srinivasan, S., and Wheeler, T.J. 2008. ExpandingSolvent SAGD in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 117571 presented at theSPE/PS/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary,20-23 October. doi:10.2118/117571-MS.
Gupta, S.C., and Gittins, S. 2005. Christina Lake Solvent Aided ProcessPilot. Paper CIPC 2005-190 presented at the Canadian International PetroleumConference, Calgary, 7-9 June. doi: 10.2118/2005-190.
Gupta, S., Gittins, S., and Picherack, P. 2002. Field Implementation ofSolvent Aided Process "Waxy" Mixtures. Paper CIPC 2002-299 presented at thePetroleum Society's Canadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC),Calgary, 11-13 June. doi:10.2118/2002-299.
GPSA Engineering Data Book (FPS), twelfth edition, Eq. 13-27a and 13-28.2004. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Gas Processors Suppliers Association.
Hein, F.J. and Marsh, R.A. 2008. Regional Geologic Framework, DepositionalModels and Resource Estimates of the Oil Sands of Alberta, Canada. Paper2008-320 presented at the World Heavy Oil Congress, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,10-12 March.
Leaute, R.P. 2002. Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery (LASER)of Bitumen with CSS: Evolution of Technology From Research Concept to a FieldPilot at Cold Lake. Paper SPE 79011 presented at the SPE International ThermalOperations and Heavy Oil Symposium and International Horizontal Well TechnologyConference, Calgary, 4-7 November. doi: 10.2118/79011-MS.
Leaute, R.P. and Carey, B.S. 2005. Liquid addition to steam for enhancingrecovery (LASER) of bitumen with CSS: Results from the first pilot cycle. Paper2005-161 presented at the 56th Canadian International Petroleum Conference(CIPC), Calgary, 7-9 June.
Li, W. and Mamora, D.D. 2010a. Experimental Investigation Of SolventCo-Injection in Vapor and Liquid Phase to Enhance SAGD Performance. Paper SPE133277 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Florence, Italy, 19-22 September. SPE-133277-MS. doi: 10.2118/133277-MS.
Li, W. and Mamora, D.D. 2010b. Simulation Investigation of SolventCo-Injection in Vapor and Liquid Phase to Reduce Shale Barrier Impact on SAGDPerformance. Paper SPE 133298 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting,Anaheim, California, USA, 27-29 May. doi: 10.2118/133298-MS.
Nasr, T.N., Beaulieu, G., Golbeck, H., and Heck, G. 2003. Novel ExpandingSolvent-SAGD Process "ES-SAGD." J Can Pet Technol 42 (1):13-16. JCPT Paper No. 03-01-TN.doi: 10.2118/03-01-TN.
Nasr, T.N. and Ayodele, O.R. 2005. Thermal Techniques for the Recovery ofHeavy Oil and Bitumen. Paper SPE 97488 presented at the SPE InternationalImproved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, 5-6 December.doi: 10.2118/97488-MS.
Nasr, T.N., and Ayodele, O.R. 2006. New Hybrid Steam-Solvent Processes forthe Recovery of Heavy Oil and Bitumen. Paper SPE 101717 presented at the AbuDhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 5-8November. doi:10.2118/101717-MS.
Redford, D.A. 1982. The Use of Solvents and Gases with Steam in the Recoveryof Bitumen from Oil Sands. J Can Pet Technol 21 (1): 45-53.JCPT Paper No. 82-01-03. doi:10.2118/82-01-03.
Redford, D.A. and McKay, A.S. 1980. Hydrocarbon-Steam Processes for Recoveryof Bitumen from Oil Sands. Paper SPE 8823 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced OilRecovery Symposium, Tulsa, 20-23 April. doi: 10.2118/8823-MS.
Shu, W.R. and Hartman, K.J. 1988. Effect of Solvent on Steam Recovery ofHeavy Oil. SPE Res Eng 3 (2): 457-465. SPE-14223-PA. doi: 10.2118/14223-PA.
Stegemeier, G.L., Laumbach, D.D., and Volek, C.W. 1980. Representing SteamProcesses with Vacuum Models. SPE J. 20 (3): 151-174.SPE-6787-PA. doi:10.2118/6787-PA.
Thomas, S. 2007. Enhanced Oil Recovery--An Overview. Oil & GasScience and Technology--Rev. IFP 63 (1): 9-19. doi:10.2516/ogst:2007060.
Zhao, L. 2004. Steam Alternating Solvent Process. Paper SPE 86957 presentedat the SPE Symposium on International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil andWestern Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 16-18 March. doi: 10.2118/86957-MS.
Zhao, L., Nasr, T.N., Huang, H., Beaulieu, G., Heck, G., and Golbeck, H.2004. Steam Alternating Solvent Process: Lab Test and Simulation. Paper CIPC2004-044 presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary,8-10 June. doi:10.2118/2004-044.