Valuation of Swing Contracts by Least-Squares Monte Carlo Simulation
- Bart J.A. Willigers (Palantir Economic Solutions) | Steve Begg (University of Adelaide) | Reidar Bratvold (University of Stavanger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Economics & Management
- Publication Date
- October 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 215 - 225
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.6 Natural Gas, 7.1.9 Project Economic Analysis, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.7.5 Economic Evaluations, 7.1.10 Field Economic Analysis, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- stochastic price simulation, swing contract, real options, least-squares Monte Carlo
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 636 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Natural gas and electricity are commonly traded through swing contracts that enable the buyer to exploit changes in market price or market demand by varying the quantity they receive from the producer (seller). The producer is assured of selling a minimum quantity at a fixed price, but must be able to meet the variable demand from the buyer. The flexibility of such contracts enables both parties to mitigate the risks and exploit the opportunities that arise from uncertainty in production, demand, price, and so on. But how valuable are they? Traditional net present value (NPV), based on expected values, cannot value this flexibility, and the traditional options/valuation techniques could not model the complexity of the terms of such contracts.
Taking gas contracts as an example, this paper seeks to (a) raise awareness of how flexibility creates value for both parties and (b) show how least-squares Monte Carlo (LSM) simulation can be used to quantify its value in dollar terms, from the perspective of both producer and buyer. Because the value of flexibility arises from the ability it gives to respond to fluctuations (e.g., in commodity prices), a useful model of swing contracts needs to reflect the nature of these fluctuations.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Barbieri, A. and Garman, M.B. 2002. Understanding the Valuation of SwingContracts, http://www.fea.com/resources/pdf/a_understanding_valuation_swing.pdf.
Begg, S.H. and Smit, N. 2007. Sensitivity of Project Economics toUncertainty in Type and Parameters of Price Models. Paper SPE 110812 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California,USA, 11-14 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110812-MS.
Black, F. and Scholes, M. 1973. The Pricing of Options and CorporateLiabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81 (3):637-654.
Boogert, A. and de Jong, C. 2006. Gas Storage Valuation Using a Monte CarloMethod. Working Paper BWPEF 0704, Birkbeck College, University of London,London (11 December 2006). http://www.ems.bbk.ac.uk/research/wp/PDF/BWPEF0704.pdf.
Bratvold, R.B., Begg, S.H., Laughton, D., Borison, A., and Enloe, T.E.2005. A Critical Comparison of Real Option Valuation Methods: Assumptions,Applicability, Mechanics, and Recommendations. Paper SPE 97011 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97011-MS.
Copeland, T. and Antikarov, V. 2001. Real Options: A Practitioner'sGuide. London, UK: Texere Publishing.
Cortazar, G., Schwartz, E.S., and Casassus, J. 2001. OptimalExploration Investments under Price and Geological-Technical Uncertainty: aReal Options Model. R&D Management 31 (2): 181-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00208.
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A., and Rubinstein, M. 1979. Option pricing: A simplifiedapproach. Journal of Financial Economics 7 (3): 229-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(79)90015-1.
Dörr, U. 2003. Valuation of Swing Options and Examination of ExerciseStrategies by Monte Carlo Techniques. MSc thesis, Kellogg College,University of Oxford, (29 September 2003).
Haarbrücker, G. and Kuhn, D. 2009. Valuation of electricity swing options bymultistage stochastic programming. Automatica 45 (4):889-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2008.11.022.
Jaillet, P., Ronn, E.I., and Tompaidis, S. 2004. Valuation ofCommodity-Based Swing Options. Management Science 50 (7):909-921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0240.
Jacques F, C. 1996. Valuation of the early-exercise price for options usingsimulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance: Mathematics andEconomics 19 (1): 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6687(96)00004-2.
Joskow, P.L. 1985. Vertical Integration and Long-term Contracts: The Case ofCoal-burning Electric Generating Plants. JLEO 1 (1):33-80.
Joskow, P.L. 1987. Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments:Empirical Evidence from Coal Markets. The American Economic Review (AER) 77 (1): 168-185.
Kaminski, V., Gibner, S., and Pinnameneni, K. 2004. Energy ExoticOptions. In Managing Energy Price Risk: The New Challenges andSolutions, ed. V. Kaminski, Sec. 1.4, 83-154. London: Risk Books.
Keppo, J. 2004. Pricing of Electricity Swing Options. The Journal ofDerivatives 11 (3): 26-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jod.2004.391033.
Lari-Lavassani, A., Simchi, M., and Ware, A. 2001. A DiscreteValuation of Swing Options. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 9 (1):35-74.
Longstaff, F.A. and Schwartz, E.S. 2001. Valuing American options bysimulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14 (1): 113-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.1.113.
Luehrman, T.A. 2001. Extending the Influence of Real Options: Problems andOpportunities. Paper SPE 71407 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71407-MS.
Merton, R.C. 1976. Option pricing when underlying stock returns arediscontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1-2):125-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90022-2.
Myers, S.C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal ofFinancial Economics 5 (2): 147-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0.
Schwartz, E. and Smith, J.E. 2000. Short-Term Variations and Long-TermDynamics in Commodity Prices. Management Science 46 (7):893-911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.7.893.12034.
Smith, J.E. and Nau, R.F. 1995. Valuing Risky Projects: Option PricingTheory and Decision Analysis. Management Science 41 (5):795-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.5.795.
Stibolt, R.D. 1996. Improving Management of Oil and Gas Assets ThroughDerivatives. Paper SPE 36632 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36632-MS.
Strickland, C. and Clewlow, L. 2000. Energy Derivatives: Pricing and RiskManagement. London: Lacima Publications.
Willigers, B.J.A. 2009. Enhanced Economic Modeling by Correlated StochasticModels of E&P Costs and Hydrocarbon Prices: The Limitations of Fixed PriceDecks and the Versatility of Least-Squares Monte Carlo Simulation. Paper SPE121442 presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 8-11June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/121442-MS.
Willigers, B.J.A. and Bratvold, R.B. 2009. Valuing Oil and Gas Options byLeast-Squares Monte Carlo Simulation. SPE Proj Fac & Const 4 (4): 146-155. SPE-116026-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116026-PA.
Willigers, B.J.A. and Hansen, T.L. 2008. Project Valuation in thePharmaceutical Industry: A Comparison of Least-Squares Monte Carlo Real OptionValuation and Conventional Approaches. R&D Management 38 (5): 520-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00530.x.
Yao, Y., Begg, S.H., ven der Hoek, J., Behrenbruch, P., and Bratvold, R.B.2006. A Case Study for Comparison of Different Real Option Approaches inPetroleum Investments. Paper SPE 101031 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil& Gas Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, Australia, 11-13 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/101031-MS.