Understanding the Effects of Leakoff Tests on Wellbore Strength
- Hong Wang (Sharp-Rock Technologies) | Mohamed Y. Soliman (Texas Tech University) | Zhaohui Shan (Halliburton Energy) | Frank Meng (ConocoPhillips) | Brian F. Towler (University of Wyoming)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- December 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 531 - 539
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 1.7 Pressure Management, 1.2.2 Geomechanics
- LOT analysis, wellbore strengthening
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,217 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Leakoff tests (LOTs) are performed to test the strength or pressure containment of the shoe after a cement job to help ensure that the new hole has been securely isolated from what has been cased off. A successful LOT can also be used to calibrate the least principal stress (many times, in the case of a vertical well, the minimum horizontal stress), or for geomechanics modeling. This will require initiating a fracture at the wellbore. Because of the near-wellbore stress concentration, for the purpose of geomechanics calibration, it is preferred to take the leakoff to the far-field stress region. To perform this extended LOT (XLOT), a relatively long fracture has to be created. Though an XLOT is needed for these reasons, some engineers tend to refrain from performing this test for fear that the test may damage the wellbore and consequently cause drilling problems.
This paper addresses this issue by investigating the effect of wellbore damage on wellbore "strength" or pressure containment. Various issues are discussed to help engineers determine when it may or may not be a concern. This should give practicing engineers the necessary insight into this complex rock-mechanics issue. The discussions are supported with results from analytical and numerical simulations based on rock-mechanics principles.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Alberty, M.W. and McLean, M.R. 2004. A Physical Model for Stress Cages.Paper SPE 90493 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90493-MS.
Aston, M.S., Alberty, M.W., Duncum, S.D., Bruton, J.R.,Friedheim, J.E., and Sanders, M.W. 2007. A New Treatment for WellboreStrengthening in Shale. Paper SPE 110713 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110713-MS.
Aston, M.S., Alberty, M.W., McLean, M.R., de Jong, H.J., and Armagost,K. 2004. Drilling Fluids for Wellbore Strengthening. Paper SPE 87130 presentedat the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, 2-4 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87130-MS.
Fuh, G.-F., Morita, N., Boyd, P.A., and McGoffin, S.J.1992. A New Approach to Preventing Lost Circulation While Drilling. Paper SPE24599 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Washington, DC, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24599-MS.
Gu, H., Eibel, J.L., Nolte, K.G., Cheng, A.H.-D., and Abousleiman, Y.1993. Formation Permeability Determination Using Impulse-Fracture Injection.Paper SPE 25425 presented at the Production Operations Symposium, OklahomaCity, Oklahoma, USA, 21-23 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25425-MS.
Kunze, K.R. and Steiger, R.P. 1991. Extended leak-off tests tomeasure in situ stress during drilling. In Rock Mechnaics as aMultidisciplinary Science, ed. J.-C. Roegiers, 35-44. Rotterdam, TheNetherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Kunze, K.R. and Steiger, R.P. 1992. Accurate In-Situ StressMeasurements During Drilling Operations. Paper SPE 24593 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24593-MS.
Nolte, K.G., Maniere, J.L., and Owens, K.A. 1997. After-ClosureAnalysis of Fracture Calibration Tests. Paper SPE 38676 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5-8October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38676-MS.
Okland, D., Gabrielsen, G.K., Gjerde, J., Sinke, K., and Williams, E.L. 2002. The Importance of Extended Leak-Off Test Data forCombatting Lost Circulation. Paper SPE 78219 presented at the SPE/ISRM RockMechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, USA, 20-23 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/78219-MS.
Postler, D.P. 1997. Pressure Integrity Test Interpretation.Paper SPE 37589 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 4-6March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37589-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., Craig, D., Bartko, K., Rahim, Z., Ansah, J., and Adams,D. 2005. New Method For Determination of Formation Permeability, ReservoirPressure, and Fracture Properties from a Minifrac Test. Paper ARMA/USRMS 05-658presented at the 40th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium (Alaska Rocks 2005): RockMechanics for Energy, Mineral and Infrastructure Development in the NorthernRegions, Anchorage, 25-29 June.
Soliman, M.Y., East, L.E., and Ansah, J. 2008. WellCompletion Design for Tight Gas Formations. Paper SPE 114988 presented at theSPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 28-30October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114988-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., Miranda, C., Wang, H.M., and Thornton, K.2011. Investigation of Effect of Fracturing Fluid on After-Closure Analysis inGas Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (2): 185-194.SPE-128016-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/128016-PA.
van Oort, E. and Vargo, R.F. 2008. Improving Formation-StrengthTests and Their Interpretation. SPE Drill & Compl 23(3): 284-294. SPE-105193-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/105193-PA.
Wang, H. 2007. Near Wellbore Stress Analysis for WellboreStrengthening. PhD dissertation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming(26 March 2007).
Wang, H., Soliman, M.Y., and Towler, B.F. 2009.Investigation of Factors for Strengthening a Wellbore by Propping Fractures.SPE Drill & Compl 24 (3): 441-451. SPE-112629-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112629-PA.
Wang, H., Soliman, M.Y., Shan, Z., and Towler, B.F.2008d. Geomechanics modeling for better drilling performance. World Oil229 (6): 77-81.
Wang, H., Soliman, M.Y., Towler, B.F., and Mukai, D.2008a. Avoiding Drilling Problems by Strengthening the Wellbore while Drilling.Paper ARMA 08-200 presented at the The 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium(USRMS), San Francisco, 29 June-2 July.
Wang, H., Soliman, M.Y., Whitfill, D.L., and Towler, B.F.2008c. Case histories show wellbore strengthening as a cost-effective optionfor drilling with narrow mud weight windows. Paper AADE-08-DF-HO-17 presentedat the 2008 AADE Fluids Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 8-9 April.
Wang, H., Towler, B.F., and Soliman, M. 2007a. Fractured WellboreStress Analysis: Sealing Cracks To Strengthen a Wellbore. Paper SPE 104947presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 20-22 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/104947-MS.
Wang, H., Towler, B.F., and Soliman, M. 2007b. Near Wellbore StressAnalysis and Wellbore Strengthening for Drilling Depleted Formations. Paper SPE102719 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium,Denver, 16-18 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102719-MS.
Wang, H., Towler, B.F., Soliman, M.Y., and Shan, Z.2008b. Wellbore Strengthening without Propping Fractures: Analysis forStrengthening a Wellbore by Sealing Fractures Alone. Paper IPTC 12280 presentedat the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 3-5December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/12280-MS.
Whitfill, D.L., Jamison, D.E., Wang, H., and Thaemlitz, C. 2006. NewDesign Models and Materials Provide Engineered Solutions to Lost Circulation.Paper SPE 101693 presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Moscow, 3-6 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/101693-MS.
Whitfill, D.L., Wang, H., Jamison, D.E., and Angove-Rogers, A. 2007. Preventing Lost Circulation Requires Planning Ahead.Paper SPE 108647 presented at the International Oil Conference and Exhibitionin Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, 27-30 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108647-MS.