Integrated Permeability Analysis in Tight and Brecciated Carbonate Reservoir
- Mohammad H. Mohammadlou (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) | Mai Britt Mørk (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- December 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 624 - 635
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.6.2 Core Analysis, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 828 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Permeability provides a measure of the ability of a porous medium to transmit fluid and is significant in evaluating reservoir productivity. A case study that compares different methods of permeability prediction in a complex carbonate reservoir is presented in this paper. Presence of siliciclastic fines and diagenetic minerals (e.g., dolomite) within carbonate breccias has resulted in a tight and heterogeneous carbonate reservoir in this case. Permeability estimations from different methods are discussed and compared. In the first part of the paper, permeability measurements from conventional core analysis (CCAL), mercury-injection capillary pressure (MICP) tests, modular formation dynamic tests (MDTs), and nuclear-magnetic-resonance (NMR) logs are discussed. Different combinations of methods can be helpful in permeability calculation, but depending on the nature and scale of each method, permeability assessment in heterogeneous reservoirs is a considerable challenge. Among these methods, the NMR log provides the most continuous permeability prediction. In the second part of the paper, the measured individual permeabilities are combined and calibrated with the NMR-derived permeability. The conventional NMR-based free-fluid (Timur-Coates) model is used to compute the permeability. The NMRestimated permeability is influenced by wettability effects, presence of isolated pores, and residual oil in the invaded zone. new modified Timur-Coates model is established on the basis of fluid saturations and isolated pore volumes (PV) of the rock. This model yields a reasonable correlation with the scaled core-derived permeabilities. However, because of the reservoir heterogeneity, particularly in the brecciated intervals, discrepancies between the core data and the modified permeability model are expected.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, M., Kersey, D.G. 1993. Enhanced ReservoirDescription: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic Flow Units andPredict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. Paper SPE 26436 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3-6October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26436-MS.
Chang, D., Vinegar, H., Morris, C. and Straley, C. 1997. Effective Porosity,Producible Fluid, and Permeability in Carbonates from NMR Logging. The LogAnalyst 38 (2): 60-72.
Chilingarian, G.V. 1963. Relationship between Porosity, Permeability andGrain Size Distribution of Sands and Sandstones. In Deltaic and ShallowMarine Deposits, ed. J. U. Van Straaten, 71-75. New York: ElsevierScience.
Coates, G.R., Miler, M., Gillen, M., and Henderson, G. 1991a. The MRIL inConoco 33-1: An Investigation of a New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Log.Annual Logging Symposium of the SPWLA 32: 1-24.
Coates, G.R., Peveraro, R.C.A., Hardwick, A., et al. 1991b. The MagneticResonance Imaging Log Characterized by Comparison with Petrophysical Propertiesand Laboratory Core Data. Paper SPE 22723 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22723-MS.
Bass, D. M. Jr. 1987. Properties of Reservoir Rocks. In PetroleumEngineering Handbook, ed. H.B. Bradley, chapter 26. Richardson, Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Darcy, H.J. 1856. Les Fontaines Publiques de la Vue de Dijon. Libraire deCorps Impérial des Pontset Chausdes et des Mines, Paris.
Dunn, K.J., LaTorraca, G.A. and Bergman, D.J. 1999. Permeability Relationwith Other Petrophysical Parameters for Periodic Porous Media.Geophysics 64 (2): 470-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1444552.
Freedman, R., Heaton, N., Flaum, M., et al. 2003. Wettability, Saturation,and Viscosity from NMR Measurements. SPE J. 8 (4): 317-327.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87340-PA.
Haddad, S., Cribbs, M., Sagar, R., et al. 2001. Integrating Permeabilitiesfrom NMR, Formation Tester, Well Test and Core Data. SPE Paper 71722 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana,30 September-3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71722-MS.
Kenyon, W.E., Day, P.I., Straley, C., et al. 1988. A Three-Part Study of NMRLongitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones. SPE FormEval 3 (3): 622-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15643-PA.
Kenyon, W.E., Takezaki, H., Straley, C., et al. 1995. A Laboratory Study ofNuclear Magnetic Resonance Relaxation and its Relation to Depositional Textureand Petrophysical Properties - Carbonate Thamama Group, Mubarazz Field, AbuDhabi. Paper SPE 29886 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, UAE,11-14 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29886-MS.
Kleinberg, R.L., Kenyon, W.E., and Mitra, P.P. 1994. Mechanism of NMRRelaxation of Fluids in Rock. J Magn Reson A 108 (2):206-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1994.1112.
Larssen, G.B., Elvebakk, G., Henriksen, L.B., et al. 2005. Upper PalaeozoicLithostratigraphy of the Southern Norwegian Barents Sea. NPD Bulletin 444: 3-43.
Leverett, M.C. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. Transactions ofthe AIME 142 (1): 152-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/941152-G.
Looyestijn, W.J. 2007. Wettability Index Determination from NMR Logs.Presented at the 48th Annual Logging Symposium of the Society ofPetrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, Austin, Texas, 3-6 June.
Looyestijn, W.J., and Hofman J.P. 2006. Wettability-Index Determination byNuclear Magnetic Resonance. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (2):146-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93624-PA.
Marschall, D., Gardner, J., and Curby, F.M. 1997. MR LaboratoryMeasurements: Requirements to Assure Successful Measurements that Will EnhanceMRI Log Interpretation. Paper SCA 9704 presented at the International Symposiumof the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Society of CoreAnalysts Chapter-at-Large, Calgary, Canada.
Mohaghegh, S. 2000.Virtual-Intelligence Applications in PetroleumEngineering: Part 1--Artificial Neural Networks. J. Pet Tech 52(9): 64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/58046-MS.
Nelson, P. 1994. Permeability-Porosity Relationships in Sedimentary Rocks.The Log Analyst 35 (3): 38-61.
Pittman, E.D. 1992. Relationship of Porosity and Permeability to VariousParameters Derived from Mercury Injection-Capillary Pressure Curves forSandstone. AAPG Bull 76 (2): 191-198.
Schlumberger Limited. 1996. Wireline Formation Testing and Sampling.Schlumberger Publication.
Swanson, B.F. 1981. A Simple Correlation Between Permeabilities and MercuryCapillary Pressures. J. Pet Tech 33 (12): 2498-2504. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8234-PA.
Tariq, S.M., Denoo, S., and Cordes, M. 1997. Permeability Estimation fromModern NMR Logging Measurements: Experiences and Applications in the RockyMountain Area. Paper SPE 38378 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain RegionalMeeting, Casper, Wyoming, 18-21 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38378-MS.
Tiab, D., and Donaldson, E.C. 2004. Petrophysics: Theory and Practice ofMeasuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, second edition.Oxford, UK: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Thompson, A., Katz, A.J., and Krohn, C.E. 1987. The Micro-Geometry andTransport Properties of Sedimentary Rock. Adv Phys 36 (5):625-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00018738700101062.