Modeling a Series of Nonaqueous Field-Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments in the Heidrun Field
- Oscar Vazquez (Heriot-Watt University) | Theo Van Ommen (Champion Technologies) | Ping Chen (Champion Technologies) | Olav Martin Selle (Statoil) | Bjorn Juliussen (Champion Technologies) | Erlend H. Kolstø (Statoil) | Øyvind Gustavsen (Statoil)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 98 - 110
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- scale treatments, Non-aqueous, modelling
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 358 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
When a conventional aqueous squeeze treatment is not suitable for preventing scale formation, a nonaqueous treatment may be applied. Generally, these types of treatments include a nonaqueous phase and can be divided into different types on the basis of the delivery system. Despite the name, most nonaqueous treatments still contain some water because of the scale-inhibitor (SI) hydrophilic nature; it only truly dissolves in water.
The main purposes of this paper are (1) to model a series of polymer nonaqueous SI squeeze treatments deployed in the Heidrun field in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea, (2) to investigate alternatives to optimize the squeeze design by studying the effect of the overflush, and (3) to show the workflow to build the input-data model from the available field data. All the field-treatment designs under study included the injection of an amphiphilic-solvent phase as the SI carrier phase and injection of a diesel overflush.
The simulation and optimization calculations were conducted using a specialized near-wellbore model for scale treatments. The simulation study matched the well water cut for the time of the treatment, followed deriving a pseudoadsorption isotherm that was used to describe the SI retention in the formation. Heidrun coreflooding data and SI-returns data were used to build the input model. Finally, a sensitivity study on the effect of the overflush on the squeeze lifetime was carried out on the basis of the created input models.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Chen, P., Hagen, H.T., Maclean, A.F., Selle, O.V., Stene, K., and Wat,R.M.S. 2002. Meeting theChallenges of Downhole Scale Inhibitor Selection for an EnvironmentallySensitive Part of the Norwegian North Sea. Paper SPE 74652 presented at theInternational Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 30-31 January. doi:10.2118/74652-MS.
Collins, I.R., Jordan, M.M., and Taylor, S.E. 2002. The Development and Application of aNovel Scale Inhibitor Deployment System. SPE Prod & Oper 17 (4): 221-228. SPE-80286-PA. doi: 10.2118/80286-PA.
Dake, L.P. 1978. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering, No. 8.Amsterdam: Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier Science BV.
Hagen, H.T., Maclean, A.F., Montgomerie, H., Wat, R.M.S., Selle, O.V., andBorstad, H. 2001. Oil soluble scale inhibitor, OSiTM, squeeze treatment inHeidrun. Paper presented at the 12th International Oil Field ChemicalSymposium, Geilo, Norway, 1-4 April.
Heath, S.M., Wylde, J.J., Archibald, M., and Sim, M. 2004. Development of Oil SolublePrecipitation Squeeze Technologies for Application in Low and High Water CutWells. Paper SPE 87451 presented at the SPE International Symposium onOilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 26-27 May. doi: 10.2118/87451-MS.
Hong, S.A. and Shuler P.J. 1988. A Mathematical Model for the ScaleInhibitor Squeeze Process. SPE Prod Eng 3 (4): 597-607;Trans., AIME, 285. SPE-16263-PA. doi: 10.2118/16263-PA.
Lopez, T.H., Fielder, G.M., Yuan, M., Williamson, D.A., and Blair, E.S.2005. Modeling and Implementing aScale-Inhibitor Squeeze in a Deep, Hot Gas Well in Mobile Bay. Paper SPE95096 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen,11-12 May. doi: 10.2118/95096-MS.
Mackay, E.J and Jordan, M.M. 2003. SQUEEZE Modelling: Treatment Designand Case Histories. Paper SPE 82227 presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, The Hague, 13-14 May. doi: 10.2118/82227-MS.
Poynton, N., Kelly, C., Fergusson, A., Ray, J., Webb, P., and Strong, A.2004. Selection and Deployment ofa Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Chemical for the BP Miller Field. Paper SPE 87466presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 26-27May. doi: 10.2118/87466-MS.
Romero, C., Bazin, B., Zaitoun, A., and Leal-Calderon, F. 2007. Behavior of a Scale InhibitorWater-in-Oil Emulsion in Porous Media. SPE Prod & Oper 2 (2): 191-201. SPE-98275-PA. doi: 10.2118/98275-PA.
Selle, O.M., Wat, R.M.S., Vikane, O., Nasvik, H., Chen, P., Hagen, T.,Montgomerie, H., and Bourne, H. 2003. A Way Beyond ScaleInhibitors--Extending Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Life Through Bridging. PaperSPE 80377 presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen,30-31 January. doi: 10.2118/80377-MS.
Sorbie, K.S., Pickup, G., and Mackay, E. 2003. Reservoir Simulation. MScthesis, Petroleum Engineering.
Sorbie, K.S., Wat, R.M.S., and Todd, A.C. 1992. Interpretation and TheoreticalModeling of Scale Inhibitor/Tracer Corefloods. SPE Prod Eng 7 (3): 307-312; Trans., AIME, 293. SPE-20687-PA. doi:10.2118/20687-PA.
Sorbie, K.S., Yuan, M.D., Todd, A.C., and Wat, R.M.S. 1991. The Modelling and Design of ScaleInhibitor Squeeze Treatments in Complex Reservoirs. Paper SPE 21024presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Anaheim,California, USA, 20-22 February. doi: 10.2118/21024-MS.
Vazquez, O., Mackay, E., and Jordan, M. 2009. Modeling the Impact of Diesel vs.Water Overflush Fluids on Scale-Squeeze-Treatment Lives Using a Two-PhaseNear-Wellbore Simulator. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (3):473-480. SPE-114105-PA. doi: 10.2118/114105-PA.
Vazquez, O., Mackay, E.J., and Sorbie, K.S. 2006. Development of a NonaqueousScale-Inhbitor Squeeze Simulator. Paper SPE 100521 presented at the SPEInternational Oilfield Scale Symposium, Aberdeen, 31 May-1 June. doi:10.2118/100521-MS.
Vazquez, O., Mackay, E.J., and Sorbie, K.S. 2007. Modelling of Nonaqueous and AqueousScale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments. Paper SPE 106422 presented at theInternational Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 28 February-2 March.doi: 10.2118/106422-MS.
Wat, R.M.S., Selle, O.V., Børstad, H., Vikane, O., Hagen, H.T., Chen, P.,and Maclean, A.F. 2001. ScaleInhibitor Squeeze Treatment Strategy on Heidrun. Paper SPE 68944 presentedat the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 21-22 May. doi:10.2118/68944-MS.
Yuan, M.D., Sorbie, K.S., Jiang, P, Chen, P., Jordan, M.M., Todd, A.C.,Hourston, K.E., and Ramstad, K. 1994. Phosphonate Scale Inhibitor Adsorption onOutcrop and Reservoir Rock Substrates--The 'Static' and 'Dynamic' AdsorptionIsotherms. In Recent Advances in Oilfield Chemistry, ed. P.H. Ogden, No.159. London, UK: Special Publication, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Zhang, H.R. and Sorbie, K.S. 1997. SQUEEZE V User's Manual. Edinburgh,Scotland: Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University.