2D Analytical Solution of Ideal Perforation Flow
- Baoyan Li (Baker Hughes) | Datong Sun (Baker Hughes) | Mikhail Gladkikh (Baker Hughes) | Jianghui Wu (Baker Hughes)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 631 - 652
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 2.2.2 Perforating, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing
- core flow efficiency, analytical solution, ideal perforation flow
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 551 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Core-flow efficiency (CFE) is defined to quantitatively evaluate the flow performance of single-shot perforation. To calculate CFE, the flow rate of the ideal perforation flow in the core target is needed. The ideal flow rate is typically calculated with numerical simulators, but the computation may be time consuming and costly.
This paper presents the 2D analytical solution of the steady-state flow model (mass-conservation equation) for an ideal single-shot perforation in a cylindrical core sample. The separation-of-variable method is used to solve the partial-differential equation (PDE) of the flow model. Pressure and velocity distributions in (r, z) space are obtained, along with the flow-rate distribution along the perforation tunnel.
The accuracy and convergence of the analytical solution for ideal single-shot perforation flow are investigated and compared with those of the numerical solution of the commercial software ANSYS Fluent (ANSYS Fluent 12.0 User's Guide 2001). The analytical solution for the governing equation of ideal perforation flow is composed of an infinite number of Bessel functions. To compute CFE by making use of this analytical solution, the analytical solution is approximated with a limited number of Bessel functions. The approximated analytical solution is analyzed and compared with the numerical solutions from ANSYS Fluent.
Further, the axial-, radial-, and radial/axial-flow geometries of an ideal single-shot perforation are characterized with their approximated analytical solutions. Interactions between the boundary condition, perforation parameters, and core parameters are investigated for these flow geometries.
The analysis results show that: (1) The analytical solution has no grid effects, (2) the boundary condition of the perforated core is the dominant factor in the ideal flow rate of the perforated core, and (3) the penetration depth and anisotropic permeability are the significant factors in the flow performance of the perforated core.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Ansah, J., Proett, M.A., and Soliman, M.Y. 2002. Advances in WellCompletion Design: A New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model for OptimizingPerformance of Perforated Completions. Paper SPE 73760 presented at theInternational Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette,Louisiana, USA, 20-21 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/73760-MS.
ANSYS Fluent 12.0 User's Guide. 2001. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania: ANSYS,Inc.
API RP 19B, Recommended Practices for Evaluation of Well Perforators.2000. Washington, DC: API.
API RP 43, Final Report Investigation of Core Orientation And PerforationDebris on Standard Perforation Flow Tests, fifth edition. 1991.Washington, DC: API.
Bear, J. 1988. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, reprint edition,128, 235. Mineola, NY: Dover Books on Physics and Chemistry, DoverPublications.
Bell, W.T., Brieger, E.F., and Harrigan, J.W. Jr. 1972. LaboratoryFlow Characteristics Of Gun Perforations. J Pet Technol 24(9): 1095-1103. SPE-3444-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3444-PA.
Box, G.E.P. and Hunter, J.S. 1957. Multifactor experimental designs forexploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Statist. 28 (1):195-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177707047.
Box, G.E.P. and Wilson, K.G. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimumconditions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 13 (1951): 1-45.
Deo, M., Tarlq, S.M., and Halleck, P.M. 1989. Linear and Radial FlowTargets for Characterizing Downhole Flow in Perforations. SPE Prod Eng 4 (3): 295-300. SPE 16896. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16896-PA.
Dogulu, Y.S. 1998. Modeling of Well Productivity in Perforated Completions.Paper SPE 51048 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania, USA, 9-11 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/51048-MS.
Harris, M.H. 1966. The Effect of Perforating Oil Well Productivity. J PetTechnol 18 (4): 518-528. SPE-1236-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1236-PA.
Karakas, M. and Tariq, S.M. 1991. Semianalytical Productivity Models forPerforated Completions. SPE Prod Eng 6 (1): 73-82.SPE-18247-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18247-PA.
Klotz, J.A., Krueger, R.F., and Pye, D.S. 1974. Effect of PerforationDamage on Well Productivity. J Pet Technol 26 (11):1033-1314. SPE-4654-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4654-PA.
Locke, S. 1981. An Advanced Method for Predicting the Productivity Ratio ofa Perforated Well. J Pet Technol 33 (12): 2481-2488.SPE-8804-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8804-PA.
MATLAB® version 7.2, release R2006a (1 March 2006). 2006. Natick,Massachusetts: The Mathworks, Inc.
Montgomery, D.C. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments,fifth edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Yildiz, T. and Roostapour, A. 2005. Post-Perforation Flow Models for APIRecommended Practices 19B. Paper SPE-94245-PA presented at the SPE ProductionOperations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 16-19 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94245-MS.