Aquifer Management To Accelerate CO2 Dissolution and Trapping
- Abhishek Anchliya (Chevron) | Christine A. Ehlig-Economides (Texas A & M University) | Behnam Jafarpour (University of Southern California)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- September 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 805 - 816
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 455 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Bulk-phase CO2 injection into saline aquifers can provide substantive reduction in CO2 emissions if the risk arising from aquifer pressurization is addressed adequately through mechanisms such as brine production out of the system (Anchliya 2009). While this approach addresses the risks associated with aquifer pressurization it does not address the problem of ensuring CO2 trapping as an immobile phase and its accumulation at the top of the aquifer. The performance of bulk-CO2-injection schemes highly depends on the seal-integrity assessment and presence of thief zones. The accumulated pocket of free CO2 can readily leak through a breach in the aquifer seal. Ideally, the aquifer should be monitored as long as the free CO2 is present, but if the CO2 is not immobilized, it is expected to remain underneath the seal rock for more than 1,000 years. Therefore, long-term monitoring of the seal integrity and avoiding leakage will be very costly.
To minimize the free CO2 below the caprock, we propose an engineered system to reduce aquifer pressurization and accelerate CO2 dissolution and trapping. We achieve these objectives through effective placement of brine injection and production wells to facilitate the lateral movement (hence, residual and solubility trapping) of CO2 in the aquifer and impede its upward movement. The simulation results for example engineered well configurations in this paper suggest that substantial improvements in immobilizing CO2 can be achieved through increasing enhanced solubility and residual trapping that result from better CO2-injection sweep efficiency. This approach has the potential to greatly reduce the risk of CO2 leakage both during and after injection. The controlled injection of CO2 with this technique reduces the uncertainty about the long-term fate of the injected CO2, prevents CO2 from migrating toward potential outlets or sensitive areas, and increases the volume of CO2 that can be stored in a closed aquifer volume during the CO2-injection period. Field-scale compositional simulation cases are discussed, and sensitivity studies are used to provide guidelines for well spacing and flow rates depending on aquifer properties and the volume of CO2 to be stored. Although it requires additional drilled wells, the active engineered configuration proposed for CO2 injection significantly reduces the reservoir volume required to effectively sequester a given volume of CO2, and the increase in the cost caused by additional wells is recovered by dramatic reduction in monitoring cost.
|File Size||7 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Anchliya, A. 2009. Aquifer Management for CO2 Sequestration. MSthesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Bryant, S.L., Lakshminarasimhan, S., and Pope, G.A. 2008. BuoyancyDominated Multiphase Flow and Its Impact on Geological Sequestration of CO2.SPE J. 13 (4): 447-454. SPE-99938-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99938-PA.
Burton, M. and Bryant, S.L. 2007. Eliminating Buoyant Migration ofSequestered CO2 Through Surface Dissolution: Implementation Costsand Technical Challenges. Paper SPE 110650 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110650-MS.
Burton, M., Kumar, N., and Bryant, S.L. 2008. Time-Dependent InjectivityDuring CO2 Storage in Aquifers. Paper SPE 113937 presented at theSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 20-23 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113937-MS.
Ennis-King, J. and Paterson, L. 2002. Engineering Aspects of GeologicalSequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Paper SPE 77809 presented at the SPE AsiaPacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia, 8-10October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77809-MS.
Ennis-King, J. and Paterson, L. 2005. Role of Convective Mixing in theLong-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Deep Saline Formations. SPE J.10 (3): 349-356. SPE-84344-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84344-PA.
Gunter, W.D., Perkins, E.H., and McCann, T.J. 1993. Aquifer disposal ofCO2 rich gases: reaction design for added capacity. EnergyConvers. Manage. 34 (9-11): 941-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(93)90040-H.
Hesse, M.A., Tchelepi, H.A., and Orr Jr., F.M. 2006. Scaling Analysis of theMigration of CO2 in Saline Aquifers. Paper SPE 102796 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA,24-27 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102796-MS.
Holtz, M.H. 2002. Residual Gas Saturation to Aquifer Influx: A CalculationMethod for 3D Computer Reservoir Model Construction. Paper SPE 75502 presentedat the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, 30 April-2 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75502-MS.
Juanes, R., Spiteri, E.J., Orr Jr., F.M., and Blunt, M.J. 2006. Impact ofrelative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage. Water Resour.Res. 42 (W12418): 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004806.
Khatib, Z.I. and Verbeek, P. 2003. Water to Value—Produced Water Managementfor Sustainable Field Development of Mature and Green Fields. J PetTechnol 55 (1): HSE Horizons, 26-28.
Kobos, P.H., Cappelle, M.A., Krumhansl, J.L., et al. 2008. Using SalineAquifers for Combined Power Plant Water Needs and Carbon Sequestration. Paperpresented at the 28th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, New Orleans, 3-5December.
Kumar, A. 2004. A Simulation Study of Carbon Sequestration in Deep SalineAquifers. MS thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Kumar, N. 2008. CO2 Sequestration: Understanding the Plume Dynamics andEstimating Risk. MSE thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas,USA.
Lara Ruiz, J.H.J. 2005. An advanced vapor-compression desalinationsystem. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas,USA (December 2005).
Leonenko, Y., Keith, D.W., Pooladi-Darvish, M., and Hassanzadeh, H. 2006.Accelerating the Dissolution of CO2 in Aquifers. Paper presented at the 8thInternational Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Trondheim,Norway, 19-22 June.
Lindeberg, E. and Wessel-Berg, D. 1997. Vertical convection in an aquifercolumn under a gas cap of CO2. Energy Convers. Manage. 38(Supplement): S229-S234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00274-9.
Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.D., Loos, M., and Meyer, L. ed.2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rapaka, S., Chen, S., Pawar, R.J., Stauffer, P.H., and Zhang, D. 2008.Non-modal growth of perturbations in density-driven convection in porous media.J. Fluid Mech. 609: 285-303. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0022112008002607.
Remy, N., Boucher, A., and Wu, J. 2009. Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS:A User's Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Riaz, A., Hesse, H., Tchelepi, H.A., and Orr, F.M.J. 2006. Onset ofconvection in a gravitationally unstable diffusive boundary layer in porousmedia. J. Fluid Mech. 548: 87-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005007494.
Schembre-McCabe, J.M., Kamath, J., and Gurton, R.M. 2007. MechanisticStudies of CO2 Sequestration. Paper IPTC 11391 presented at theInternational Petroleum Technology Conference, Dubai, 4-6 December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/11391-MS.
Surdam, R.C. 2008. Wyoming Energy Development in the Context of theGlobal Economy, No. 6. Laramie, Wyoming, USA: Challenges in GeologicResource Development Series, Wyoming Geological Survey.
Taku Ide, S., Jessen, K., and Orr, F.M. Jr. 2007. Storage of CO2 in salineaquifers: Effects of gravity, viscous, and capillary forces on amount andtiming of trapping. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1 (4):481-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00091-6.
van der Meer, L. and van Wees, J.-D. 2006. Limitations to Storage Pressurein Finite Saline Aquifers and the Effect of CO2 Solubility onStorage Pressure. Paper SPE 103342 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103342-MS.
van Engelenburg, B.C.W. and Blok, K. 1993. Disposal of Carbon Dioxide inPermeable Underground Layers: A Feasible Option? Clim. Change 23 (1): 55-68.