Fluid-Diversion Monitoring: The Key to Treatment Optimization
- Gerard Glasbergen (Halliburton) | Valerie Jean Yeager (Halliburton) | Robert P. Reyes (Halliburton) | Don M. Everett (OXY Permain Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 262 - 274
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.11 Reservoir monitoring with permanent sensors, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.8 Formation Damage
- distributed temperature sensing, insitu crosslinked acids, fluid diversion monitoring, relative permeability modification
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 846 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In stimulation and injection treatments for removing or preventing formation damage, placement of the injected fluids is essential. Throughout the years, several diversion and placement techniques have been applied to obtain a desired fluid placement. A recent development is the application of distributed temperature sensing (DTS) to monitor the temperature profiles along the wellbore in real time during these treatments. Recent case histories showed that fluid placement can be quantified. Quantification of fluid distribution enables one to determine the flow distribution both before and after a diverter stage so that the diversion effect can be quantified.
This paper discusses several case histories where DTS was applied to quantify the effectiveness of different diverters. The effects of chemical diverters, such as relative permeability modifiers (RPMs) and in-situ-crosslinked acids (ICAs), and more-traditional diverters, such as rock salt, are discussed. Because of the advanced monitoring used with the temperature profiles, both the immediate and the sustained effect of the diverters can be measured. The changes in the flow distribution are not limited to diverters. Reactive fluid or changes in flow rate can change the flow distribution as well. These effects were measured during the stimulation treatments.
The post-treatment analysis of the measured temperature profiles in combination with treatment pressures and flow-rate information resulted in accurate knowledge of the effectiveness of the different diverters and stimulation effects over time. This knowledge will be used in future treatments to help optimize volumes, rates, fluid systems, and the selection of the appropriate diverter.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Eoff, L., Dalrymple, D., and Reddy, B.R. 2005. Development of Associative PolymerTechnology for Acid Diversion in Sandstone and Carbonate Lithology. SPEProd & Fac 20 (3): 250-256. SPE-89413-PA. doi:10.2118/89413-PA.
Erbstoesser, S.R. 1980. ImprovedBall Sealer Diversion. J Pet Technol 32 (11):1903-1910. SPE-8401-PA. doi: 10.2118/8401-PA.
Fulton, D., Lizek, K., and Van Domelen, M. 2005. Front End Engineering Studies forCarbonate Stimulation Optimization. Paper IPTC 10697 presented at theInternational Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, 21-23 November. doi:10.2523/10697-MS.
Glasbergen, G. and Buijse, M. 2006. Improved Acid Diversion Design Usinga Placement Simulator. Paper SPE 102412 presented at the SPE Russian Oiland Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 3-6 October. doi:10.2118/102412-MS.
Glasbergen, G., Gualtieri, D., Trehan, R., Van Domelen, M.S., and Nelson, M.2007. Real-Time DiversionQuantification and Optimization Using DTS. Paper SPE 110707 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA,11-14 November. doi: 10.2118/110707-MS.
Glasbergen, G., Gualtieri, D., Van Domelen, M., and Sierra, J. 2009. Real-Time Fluid DistributionDetermination in Matrix Treatments Using DTS. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (1): 135-146. SPE-107775-PA. doi: 10.2118/107775-PA.
Hill, A.D. and Rossen, W.R. 1994. Fluid Placement and Diversion inMatrix Acidizing. Paper SPE 27982 presented at the University of TulsaCentennial Petroleum Engineering Symposium, Tulsa, 29-31 August. doi:10.2118/27982-MS.
Johnson, D., Sierra, J., and Gualtieri, D. 2006. Successful Flow Profiling of GasWells Using Distributed Temperature Sensing Data. Paper SPE 103097presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA,24-27 September. doi: 10.2118/103097-MS.
Keck, R.G., Reiter, D..F, Lynch, K.W., and Upchurch, E.R. 2000. Analysis of Measured BottomholeTreating Pressures During Fracturing: Do Not Believe Those CalculatedBottomhole Pressures. Paper SPE 63033 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. doi: 10.2118/63033-MS.
Lietard, O. 1997. MatrixTreatment in Horizontal Openhole Wells: Design of Viscous Diverter Slugs andTreatment Fluid Placement Optimization. Paper SPE 38201 presented at theSPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 2-3 June. doi:10.2118/38201-MS.
MaGee, J., Buijse, M.A., and Pongratz, R. 1997. Method for Effective Fluid DiversionWhen Performing a Matrix Acid Stimulation in Carbonate Formations. PaperSPE 37736 presented at the Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 17-20 March. doi:10.2118/37736-MS.
McLeod, H.O. Jr. and Coulter, A.W. Jr. 1969. The Stimulation Treatment PressureRecord--An Overlooked Formation Evaluation Tool. J Pet Technol 21 (8): 952-960. SPE-2287-PA. doi: 10.2118/2287-PA.
Nitters, G. and Davies, D.R. 1989. Granular Diverting Agents Selection,Design, and Performance. Paper SPE 18884 presented at the SPE ProductionOperations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 13-14 March. doi:10.2118/18884-MS.
Paccaloni, G. 1979. Field History Verifies Control, Evaluation. Oil andGas Journal 77 (26 November 1979): 61-65.
Paccaloni, G. 1995. A New,Effective Matrix Stimulation Diversion Technique. SPE Prod & Fac 10 (3): 151-156. SPE-24781-PA. doi: 10.2118/24781-PA.
Parlar, M., Parris, M.D., Jasinski, R.J., and Robert, J.A. 1995. An Experimental Study of Foam FlowThrough Berea Sandstone With Applications to Foam Diversion in MatrixAcidizing. Paper SPE 29678 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting,Bakersfield, California, USA, 8-10 March. doi: 10.2118/29678-MS.
Rossen, W.R. 1996. Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. In Foams: Theory,Measurements and Applications, ed. R.K. Prud'Homme and S. Khan. New York:Marcel Dekker.
Sierra, J., Kaura, J., Gualtieri, D., Glasbergen, G., Sarkar, D., andJohnson, D. 2008. DTS MonitoringData of Hydraulic Fracturing: Experiences and Lessons Learned. Paper SPE116182 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,21-24 September. doi: 10.2118/116182-MS.
Yeager, V. and Shuchart, C. 1997. In-Situ Gels Improve Formation Acidizing.Oil & Gas Journal 95 (3): 70-72.