Gas/Condensate Relative Permeability of a Low Permeability Core: Coupling vs. Inertia
- Mahmoud Jamiolahmady (Heriot-Watt University) | Mehran Sohrabi (Heriot-Watt University) | Panteha Ghahri (Heriot-Watt University) | Shaun Ireland (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 214 - 227
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.5.1 Simulator Development, 5.8.8 Gas-condensate reservoirs, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 2.2.2 Perforating, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 1,239 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Flow around the wellbore of gas/condensate systems, when pressure drops below dewpoint, is controlled by complex interaction of capillary, viscous, and inertial forces. Hence, it is challenging to determine accurately gas/condensate relative permeability (kr) that is affected by the relative impact of these competing forces.
There are a number of reports demonstrating kr of high permeability rocks affected by both coupling [the increase of kr as velocity increases and/or interfacial tension (IFT) decreases] and inertia (i.e., the reduction of kr as velocity increases) for these low IFT systems. However, there is little information on this subject for low-permeability rocks.
In this work, different series of steady-state kr values for a 3.9-md sandstone reservoir rock with a porosity of 6% are reported. These kr data sets have been measured experimentally at three IFT levels below 1 mNm-1 and five velocity levels below 200 md-1.
The results indicate that at the highest IFT, inertia is dominant at low condensate-/gas-flow-rate ratio(CGFR) at test conditions, whereby kr reduces with increasing velocities. At higher CGFR, an increase in kr is observed because of the dominant effect of coupling. At lower IFT, the negative impact of inertia on kr as velocity increases is observed at all CGFR. Jamiolahmady et al. (2008) have recently reported kr of highly conductive propped fractures showing a more pronounced effect of inertia at lower IFT, but this is the first report of such behavior for low permeability rocks. These kr measurements are also compared with the corresponding predicted kr using the generalized kr correlation recently developed by Jamiolahmady et al. (2009). The correlation expresses the combined effect of coupling and inertia with universal parameters. The unique contribution of inertia, as observed in the experiments and predicted by the correlation, is attributed mainly to the high single-phase inertial factor of the rock and fluid properties of the flowing phases.
|File Size||669 KB||Number of Pages||14|
Al-Hussainy, R., Ramey, H.J. Jr., and Crawford, P.B. 1966. The Flow of Real Gases ThroughPorous Media. J. Pet Tech 18 (5): 624-636;Trans., AIME, 237. SPE-1243-A-PA. doi: 10.2118/1243-A-PA.
Bardon, C. and Longeron, D.G. 1980a. Influence of Very Low InterfacialTensions on Relative Permeability. SPE J. 20 (5):391-401. SPE-7609-PA. doi: 10.2118/7609-PA.
Blom, S.M.P. and Hagoort, J. 1988. How to Include the Capillary Numberin Gas Condensate Relative Permeability Functions? Paper SPE 49268presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,27-30 September. doi: 10.2118/49268-MS.
Blom, S.M.P. and Hagoort, J. 1998. The Combined Effect of Near-CriticalRelative Permeability and Non-Darcy Flow on Well Impairment by Condensate DropOut. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (5): 421-429.SPE-51367-PA. doi: 10.2118/51367-PA.
Danesh, A., Khazam, M., Henderson, G.D., Tehrani, D.H., and Peden, J.M.1994. Gas Condensate Recovery Studies. Paper presented at the DTI Improved OilRecovery and Research Dissemination Seminar, London, June.
ECLIPSE Reservoir Engineering Software Technical Reference Manual. 2007.Schlumberger, http://www.slb.com/content/services/software/reseng/.
Forchheimer, P. 1914. Hydraulik, Chap. 15, 116-118. Leipzig: Druckund Verlag Von B.G. Teubner.
Henderson, G.D., Danesh, A., and Tehrani, D.H. 2001. Effect of Positive RateSensitivity and Inertia on Gas Condensate Relative Permeability at HighVelocity. Petroleum Geoscience 7 (1): 45-50.
Henderson, G.D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H., Al-Shaidi, S., and Peden, J.M.1996. Measurement and Correlationof Gas Condensate Relative Permeability by the Steady-State Method. SPEJ. 1 (2): 191-202. SPE-31065-PA. doi: 10.2118/31065-PA.
Jamiolahmady, M., Danesh, A., Sohrabi, M., and Ataei, R. 2007. Gas Condensate Flow in PerforatedRegions. SPE J. 12 (1): 89-99. SPE-94072-PA. doi:10.2118/94072-PA.
Jamiolahmady, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H., and Duncan, D.B. 2000. A Mechanistic Model ofGas-Condensate Flow in Pores. Transport in Porous Media 41 (1): 17-46. doi:10.1023/A:1006645515791.
Jamiolahmady, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H., and Duncan, D.B. 2003. Positive Effect of FlowVelocity on Gas-Condensate Relative Permeability: Network Modelling andComparison with Experimental Results. Transport in Porous Media 52 (2): 159-183. doi:10.1023/A:1023529300395.
Jamiolahmady, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D.H., and Sohrabi, M. 2006. Variations of Gas/Condensate RelativePermeability With Production Rate at Near-Wellbore Conditions: A GeneralCorrelation. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (6): 688-697.SPE-83960-PA. doi: 10.2118/83960-PA.
Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., and Ireland, S. 2008. Gas Condensate RelativePermeabilities in Propped Fracture Porous Media: Coupling Versus Inertia.Paper SPE 115726 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 21-24 September. doi: 10.2118/115726-MS.
Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., Ireland, S., and Ghahri, P. 2009. A generalized correlationfor predicting gas-condensate relative permeability at near wellboreconditions. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 66 (3-4): 98-110. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2009.02.001.
Mott, R., Cable, A., and Spearing, M. 2000. Measurements and Simulation ofInertial and High Capillary Number Flow Phenomena in Gas-Condensate RelativePermeability. Paper SPE 62932 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. doi: 10.2118/62932-MS.
NeW-COIN (Near Wellbore-COupling INertia) software, Version 2.2 technicalreference manuals. 2009. Heriot Watt Institute of Petroleum Engineering GasCondensate Recovery project, http://www.pet.hw.ac.uk/research/hrm/gas_cond/gas_cond.cfm.
VIP® Reservoir Simulation Suite reference manual. 2007. Houston:Halliburton.
Whitson, C.H., Fevang, Ø., and Sævareid, A. 1999. Gas Condensate Relative Permeabilityfor Well Calculations. Paper SPE 56476 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. doi:10.2118/56476-MS.