Gas Recovery From Tight Sands: Impact of Capillarity
- Duc H. Le (Chevron Corporation) | Hai N. Hoang (Chevron Corporation) | Jagannathan Mahadevan (Chevron Corporation)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 981 - 991
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 3.3.6 Integrated Modeling, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 977 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Hydraulic-fracturing operations carried out by injecting large volumes of water cause invasion of the injected water into the formation and create a water block. The flow of gas toward the wellbore/fracture during production will result in the removal of the water block through viscous displacement, as well as evaporation, that occurs because of gas expansion over a long period of time. However, some observations from the field show that the productivity of hydraulically fractured tight gas wells improves after a period of shut-in, leading to a speculation as to whether capillary suction is responsible for the cleanup of water block that eventually leads to productivity improvement. In this work, we use laboratory-scale experiments and modeling to find that capillary-driven transport is an important mechanism that helps redistribute water within the tight gas rock sample. Without capillarity, the model underpredicts the effective gas relative permeability recovery in the laboratory sample. We also find, using simulations, that capillary transport has the effect of enhancing the overall evaporation rate of water from the rock core. The model for calculating saturation changes and the effective gas relative permeability is complete with regard to all the mechanisms, such as displacement and evaporation. This is unlike previous studies, which did not include one or the other.
Field-scale-simulation study of gas flowback using the new integrated model shows that the effective gas relative permeability of the invaded zone is significantly affected by capillary suction. In the absence of capillary suction, displacement and evaporation proceed as usual, but the invaded-zone water saturation does not dissipate quickly enough. The fracture-face skin, which is a function of the effective gas relative permeability, decreases faster as the invaded zone water is redistributed because of capillary suction. The simulations show that the evaporation of water from the invaded zone is very slow because of the low gas-flow rates in the tight rock matrix. In comparison to evaporative removal of water from the invaded zone, capillary-suction removal is significantly higher and faster.
A sensitivity study on fracture-face skin shows that capillary suction has a significant effect on the cleanup at low drawdowns and smaller invasion depths. At complete shut-in conditions, the invaded-zone saturation continues to dissipate because of capillary suction. This confirms the general observation and anecdotal evidence that tight-sandstone wells produce at greater gas-flow rates after a period of shut-in. The methods described in this study can be adapted to perhaps determine the duration of such shut-in periods. Additionally, the models can be used to rigorously predict gas-production rates from a fractured well, including capillary effects, without resorting to averaging concepts such as fracture-face skin.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Abrams, A. and Vinegar, H.J. 1985. Impairment Mechanisms in Vicksburg TightGas Sands. Paper SPE 13883 presented at the SPE/DOE Low Permeability GasReservoirs Symposium, Denver, 19-22 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13883-MS.
Bennion, D.B., Thomas, F.B., Imer, D., and Ma, T. 2000. LowPermeability Gas Reservoirs and Formation Damage—Tricks and Traps. Paper SPE59753 presented at the SPE/CERI Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, 3-5 April.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/59753-MS.
Chowdiah, P. 1987. Laboratory Measurements Relevant to Two-Phase Flow in aTight Gas Sand Matrix. Paper SPE 16945 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, 27-30 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16945-MS.
Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego, V. 1977. Effect of Wellbore Storage and Damageon the Transient Pressure Behavior of Vertically Fractured Wells. Paper SPE6752 presented at the SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/6752-MS.
Gdanski, R., Fulton, D., and Shen, C. 2006. Fracture Face SkinEvolution During Cleanup. Paper SPE 101083 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/101083-MS.
Holditch, S.A. 1979. Factors Affecting Water Blocking and Gas Flow FromHydraulically Fractured Gas Wells. J Pet Technol 31 (12):1515-1524. SPE-7561-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7561-PA.
Kamath, J. and Laroche, C. 2003. Laboratory-Based Evaluation of Gas WellDeliverability Loss Caused by Water Blocking. SPE J. 8 (1):71-80. SPE-83659-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/83659-PA.
Lake, L.W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Laroche, C., Chen, M., Yortsos, Y.C., and Kamath, J. 2004. TimeScaling of Rates of Produced Fluids in Laboratory Displacement. SPE J. 9 (1): 34-46. SPE-87677-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87677-PA.
Lee, W.J. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 1996. Gas Reservoir Engineering.Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, SPE.
Mahadevan, J. and Sharma, M.M. 2005. Factors Affecting Cleanup of WaterBlocks: A Laboratory Investigation. SPE J. 10 (3): 238-246.SPE-84216-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84216-PA.
Mahadevan, J., Sharma, M.M., and Yortsos, Y.C. 2006. Flow-ThroughDrying of Porous Media. AIChE J. 52 (7): 2367-2380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.10859.
Mahadevan, J., Sharma, M.M., and Yortsos, Y.C. 2007. Capillary Wickingin Gas Wells. SPE J. 12 (4): 429-437. SPE-103229-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103229-PA.
Motealleh, S. and Bryant, S.L. 2009. Quantitative Mechanism for PermeabilityReduction by Small Water Saturation in Tight-Gas Sandstones. SPE J. 14 (2): 252-258. SPE-107950-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107950-PA.
Newsham, K.E., Rushing, J.A., Lasswell, P.M., Cox, J.C., and Blasingame, T.A. 2004. A Comparative Study of Laboratory Techniques forMeasuring Capillary Pressures in Tight Gas Sands. Paper SPE 89866 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89866-MS.
Novy, R.A., Toledo, P.G., Davis, H.T., and Scriven, L.E. 1989.Capillary dispersion in porous media at low wetting phase saturations. Chem.Eng. Sci. 44 (9): 1785-1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85121-8.
Parekh, B. and Sharma, M.M. 2004. Cleanup of Water Blocks in DepletedLow-Permeability Reservoirs. Paper SPE 89837 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89837-MS.
Rossen, W.R. and Bruining, J. 2007. Foam Displacements With Multiple SteadyStates. SPE J. 12 (1): 5-18. SPE-89397-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89397-PA.
Shanley, K.W., Cluff, R.M., and Robinson, J.W. 2004. Factorscontrolling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:Implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis.AAPG Bull. 88 (8): 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/03250403051.
Tannich, J.D. 1975. Liquid Removal from Hydraulically Fractured Gas Wells.J Pet Technol 27 (11): 1309-1317. SPE-5113-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5113-PA.
Ward, J.S. and Morrow, N.R. 1987. Capillary Pressure and Gas RelativePermeabilities of Low-Permeability Sandstone. SPE Form Eval 2 (3): 345-356. SPE-13882-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13882-PA.
Yiotis, A.G., Boudouvis, A.G., Stubos, A.K., Tsimpanogiannis, I.N.,and Yortsos, Y.C. 2004. Effect of liquid films on the drying of porousmedia. AIChE J. 50 (11): 2721-2737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.10265.
Zuluaga, E. and Lake, L.W. 2004. Modeling of Experiments on WaterVaporization for Gas Injection. Paper SPE 91393 presented at the SPE EasternRegional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, USA, 15-17 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/91393-MS.