MRI Visualization of Spontaneous Methane Production From Hydrates in Sandstone Core Plugs When Exposed to CO2
- Arne Graue (U. of Bergen) | B. Kvamme (U. of Bergen) | Bernie Baldwin (Green Country Petrophysics LLC) | Jim Stevens (Conocophillips) | James J. Howard (ConocoPhillips Co) | Eirik Aspenes (U. of Bergen) | Geir Ersland (U. of Bergen) | Jarle Husebo (U. of Bergen) | D. Zornes (ConocoPhillips)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2008
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 146 - 152
- 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.6 Natural Gas, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.9.1 Gas Hydrates, 4.3.1 Hydrates
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 651 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of core samples in laboratory experiments showed that CO2 storage in gas hydrates formed in porous rock resulted in the spontaneous production of methane with no associated water production. The exposure of methane hydrate in the pores to liquid CO2 resulted in methane production from the hydrate that suggested the exchange of methane molecules with CO2 molecules within the hydrate without the addition or subtraction of significant amounts of heat. Thermodynamic simulations based on Phase Field Theory were in agreement with these results and predicted similar methane production rates that were observed in several experiments. MRI-based 3D visualizations of the formation of hydrates in the porous rock and the methane production improved the interpretation of the experiments. The sequestration of an important greenhouse gas while simultaneously producing the freed natural gas offers access to the significant amounts of energy bound in natural gas hydrates and also offers an attractive potential for CO2 storage. The potential danger associated with catastrophic dissociation of hydrate structures in nature and the corresponding collapse of geological formations is reduced because of the increased thermodynamic stability of the CO2 hydrate relative to the natural gas hydrate.
The replacement of methane in natural gas hydrates with CO2 presents an attractive scenario of providing a source of abundant natural gas while establishing a thermodynamically more stable hydrate accumulation. Natural gas hydrates represent an enormous potential energy source as the total energy corresponding to natural gas entrapped in hydrate reservoirs is estimated to be more than twice the energy of all known energy sources of coal, oil, and gas (Sloan 2003). Thermodynamic stability of the hydrate is sensitive to local temperature and pressure, but all components in the hydrate have to be in equilibrium with the surroundings if the hydrate is to be thermodynamically stable. Natural gas hydrate accumulations are therefore rarely in a state of complete stability in a strict thermodynamic sense. Typically, the hydrate associated with fine-grain sediments is trapped between low-permeability layers that keep the system in a state of very slow dynamics. One concern of hydrate dissociation, especially near the surface of either submarine or permafrost-associated deposits, is the potential for the release of methane to the water column or atmosphere. Methane represents an environmental concern because it is a more aggressive (~25 times) greenhouse gas than CO2. A more serious concern is related to the stability of these hydrate formations and its impact on the surrounding sediments. Changes in local conditions of temperature, pressure, or surrounding fluids can change the dynamics of the system and lead to catastrophic dissociation of the hydrates and consequent sediment instability. The Storegga mudslide in offshore Norway was created by several catastrophic hydrate dissociations. The largest of these was estimated to have occurred 7,000 years ago and was believed to have created a massive tsunami (Dawson et al. 1988). The replacement of natural gas hydrate with CO2 hydrate has the potential to increase the stability of hydrate-saturated sediments under near-surface conditions. Hydrocarbon exploitation in hydrate-bearing regions has the additional challenge to drilling operations of controlling heat production from drilling and its potential risk of local hydrate dissociation (Yakushev and Collett 1992).
The molar volume of hydrate is 25-30% greater than the volume of liquid water under the same temperature-pressure conditions. Any production scenario for natural gas hydrate that involves significant dissociation of the hydrate (e.g., pressure depletion) has to account for the release of significant amounts of water that in turn affects the local mechanical stress on the reservoir formation. In the worst case, this would lead to local collapse of the surrounding formation. Natural gas production by CO2 exchange and sequestration benefits from the observation that there is little or no associated liquid water production during this process. Production of gas by hydrate dissociation can produce large volumes of associated water, and can create a significant environmental problem that would severely limit the economic potential.
The conversion from methane hydrate to a CO2 hydrate is thermodynamically favorable in terms of free energy differences, and the phase transition is coupled to corresponding processes of mass and heat transport. The essential question is then if it is possible to actually convert methane hydrate as found in sediments to CO2 hydrate. Experiments that formed natural gas hydrates in porous sandstone core plugs used MRI to monitor the dynamics of hydrate formation and reformation. The paper emphasizes the experimental procedures developed to form the initial natural gas hydrates in sandstone pores and the subsequent exchange with CO2 while monitoring the dynamic process with 3D imaging on a sub millimetre scale. The in-situ imaging illustrates the production of methane from methane hydrate when exposed to liquid CO2 without any external heating.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||7|
Baldwin, B.A., Moradi-Araghi, A., and Stevens, J.C. 2003. Monitoring hydrate formationand dissociation in sandstone and bulk with magnetic resonance imaging.Magnetic Resonance Imaging 21 (9): 1061-1069. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2003.05.001.
Broecker, W.S. and Peng, T.H. 1982. Tracers in the sea. Palisades,New York: Eldigio Press.
Dawson, A.G., Long. D., and Smith. D.E. 1988. The Storegga slides:Evidence from eastern Scotland for a possible tsunami. MarineGeology 82 (3-4): 271-276. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(88)90146-6.
Demurov, A., Radhakrishnan, R., and Trout, B.L. 2002. Computations of diffusivities in iceand CO2 clathrate hydrates via molecular dynamics and Monte Carlosimulations. J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2): 702-709. doi:10.1063/1.1425821.
Granasy, L., Pusztai, T., Tegze, G., Kuznetsova, T., and Kvamme, B. 2004.Phase field theory of hydrate nucleation: Formation of CO2 hydrate in aqueoussolution. In Recent Advances in the Study of Gas Hydrates, ed. C. Taylorand J.T. Kiwan. New York City: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Kobayashi, I, Ito, Y., and Mori, Y.H. 2001. Microscopic observationsof clathrate-hydrate films formed at liquid/liquid interfaces. I. Morphology ofhydrate films. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (14): 4331-4338. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00544-3.
Kvamme, B. 2000. Phase transitions and stabilities in seawater containingcarbon dioxide. In Recent Advances in Marine Science and Technology, ed.N. Saxena, 279-289. Honolulu, Hawaii: Pacon International,.
Kvamme, B. and Kuznetsova, T. 2005. Investigation into stability andinterfacial properties of CO2 hydrate-aqueous fluid system. InternationalConference of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2005, Loutraki,Greece, 21-26 October.
Kvamme, B. and Tanaka, H. 1995. Thermodynamic stability ofhydrates for ethane, ethylene, and carbon dioxide. J.Phys.Chem.99 (18): 7114-7119. doi: 10.1021/j100018a052.
Kvamme, B. et al. 2004. Kinetics of solid hydrate formationby carbon dioxide: Phase field theory of hydrate nucleation and magneticresonance imaging. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 6:2327-2334. doi: 10.1039/b311202k.
Makogan, Y.F. 1997. Hydrates of hydrocarbons. Tulsa: PennwellPublishing.
Moudrakovski, I.L., Ratcliffe, C.I., and Ripmeister, J.A. 2002. Applicationof magnetic resonance microimaging (MRM) to monitor the formation of gashydrate. Proc., Fourth International Conference on Gas Hydrates,Yokohama, Japan, 19-23 May.
Panhuis, M.I.H., Patterson, C.H., and Lynden-Bell, R.M. 1988. A MolecularDyamics Study of Carbon Dioxide in Water: Diffusion, Structure andThermodynamics. Molec. Phys. 94 (6): 963-972.
Sloan, E.D. Jr. 2003. Fundamental principles andapplications of natural gas hydrates. Nature 426: 353-359.doi: 10.1038/nature02135.
Svandal, A. and Kvamme, B. 2005. The influence of diffusion on hydrategrowth. Proc., 1st International Conference on Diffusion in Solids and Liquids,University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal, 6-8 July.
Techmer, K., Heinrichs, T., and. Kuhs, W.F. 2005. Cryo-electron microscopicstudies on the structures and composition of Mallik gas-hydrate-bearingsamples. In Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate ProductionResearch Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada,Bulletin 585, ed. S.R. Dallimore und T.S. Collett, Ottawa, Ontario,Canada: Geological Survey of Canada.
Yakushev, V.S. and Collett, T.S. 1992. Gas hydrates in arctic regions: Riskto drilling and production. Proc., 2nd International Offshore and PolarEngineering Conference, San Francisco, 14-19 June.