A Multiresolution Analysis of the Relationship Between Spatial Distribution of Reservoir Parameters and Time Distribution of Well-Test Data
- Abeeb A. Awotunde (Stanford University) | Roland Horne (Stanford University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 345 - 356
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 7.6.2 Data Integration, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.5.8 History Matching, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation
- Spatial distribution, Time distribution
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 605 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
With recent advances in permanent downhole technology, well-test analysts now have to deal with enormous amounts of data. Using these data requires the development of efficient algorithms that are able to extract the relevant information from the data at minimal cost. We present a multiresolution wavelet approach to estimate the spatial distribution of reservoir parameters, by performing the nonlinear least-squares regression in the wavelet domains of both time and space. Wavelet transforms have the ability to reveal important events in time signals or spatial images. Thus, we transformed both the model space and the time-series pressure data into spatial wavelet and time wavelet domains, respectively, and used a thresholding to select a subset of wavelet coefficients from each of the transformed domains. These subsets were used subsequently in nonlinear regression to estimate the appropriate description of reservoir parameters. The appropriate subset is not only smaller; the problem is also reduced to the consideration of only the important components of the measured data and only the part of the reservoir description that depends on them.
As a test of the approach, we first applied the model to well-test problems involving 1D (radially composite) reservoir systems. The inverse problem was solved to estimate the distributed permeability values by performing the nonlinear least-squares regression in the wavelet domains (time and space).
Results obtained were compared with those obtained from the conventional nonlinear-regression approach, using all the pressure-time data and the full set of spatial reservoir parameters. The time/space wavelet approach proved to be efficient. By reducing the dimensions of the model and data spaces, the approach eliminates redundancy in the reservoir description and in the data set. Significantly, the approach reveals the true number of reservoir parameters that can be appropriately estimated from a given data set and also reveals which components of the full data set are active in constraining the reservoir model. Thus, the approach provides a good means to integrate different data properly while avoiding the inclusion of irrelevant data during nonlinear regression.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Athichanagorn, S., Horne, R.N., and Kikani, J. 2002. Processing andInterpretation of Long-Term Data Acquired From Permanent Pressure Gauges.SPE Res Eval & Eng 5 (5): 384-391. SPE-80287-PA. doi: 10.2118/80287-PA.
Chan, K. and Fu, A.W. 1999. Efficient Time Series Matching by Wavelets.Proc., International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE '99), Sydney,23-26 March, 126-133.
Chang, S.G., Yu, B., and Vertterli, M. 2000. Spatially adaptive waveletthresholding with context modeling for image denoising. IEEE Transactions onImage Processing 9 (9): 1522-1531. doi:10.1109/83.862630.
Chu, L., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S. 1995. Computation of sensitivitycoefficients for conditioning the permeability field to well-test data. InSitu 19 (2): 179-223.
Chu, L., Schatzinger, R.A., and Tham, M.K. 1998. Application of WaveletAnalysis to Upscaling of Rock Properties. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (1): 75-81. SPE-36517-PA. doi: 10.2118/36517-PA.
Chui, C.K. 1992. An Introduction to Wavelets, Vol. 1. San Diego,California, USA: Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications, Academic Press.
Daubechies, I. 1992. Ten Lectures on Wavelets, No. 61. Philadelphia,Pennsylvania, USA: CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics,Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
Donoho, D.L., and Johnstone, J.M. 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by waveletshrinkage. Biometrika 81 (3): 425-455. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425.
Führ, H. 2005. Wavelets Skriptzur gleichnamigen Vorlesung an der TU München,Sommersemester 2005 (script of a lecture presented at the University of Munich,summer semester 2005) Munich, Germany.
Guangming, S., Xiaoping, L., Licheng, J., and Wei, Z. 2002. Adaptive WaveletThresholding for Time Varying SNR Signal Denoising. Proc., IEEE InternationalSymposium on Circuits and Systems, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 26-29 May, Vol, 4,IV-827-IV-829. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2002.1010585.
Jansen, F.E. and Kelkar, M.G. 1997. Application of Wavelets to ProductionData in Describing Inter-Well Relationships. Paper SPE 38876 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5-8October. doi:10.2118/38876-MS.
Kikani, J. and He, M. 1998. Multiresolution Analysis of Long-Term PressureTransient Data Using Wavelet Methods. Paper SPE 48966 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. doi: 10.2118/48966-MS.
Lu, P. 2001. Reservoir Parameter Estimation Using Wavelet Analysis. PhDdissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA (May 2001).
Lu, P. and Horne, R.N. 2000. A Multiresolution Approach to ReservoirParameter Estimation Using Wavelet Analysis. Paper SPE 62985 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. doi: 10.2118/62985-MS.
Mallat, S. 1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, second edition.San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press.
Mallat, S.G. 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: thewavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence 11 (7): 674-693. doi: 10.1109/34.192463.
Moridis, G.J., Nikolaou, M., and You, Y. 1996. The Use of Wavelet Transformsin the Solution of Two-Phase Flow Problems. SPE J. 1 (2):169-178. SPE-29144-PA. doi:10.2118/29144-PA.
Oppenheim, A.V. and Schafer, R.W.1975. Digital Signal Processing. EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
Panda, M.N., Mosher, C.C., and Chopra, A.K. 2000. Application of WaveletTransforms to Reservoir-Data Analysis and Scaling. SPE J. 5(1): 92-101. SPE-60845-PA. doi:10.2118/60845-PA.
Panda, M.N., Mosher, C.C., and Chopra, A.K. 2001. Reservoir Modeling UsingScale-Dependent Data. SPE J. 6 (2): 157-170. SPE-71311-PA.doi: 10.2118/71311-PA.
Percival, D.B. and Walden, A.T. 2000. Wavelet Methods for Time SeriesAnalysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Series in Statistical and ProbabalisticMathematics, Cambridge University Press.
Sahni, I. 2006. Multiresolution Reparameterization and Partitioning of ModelSpace for Reservoir Characterization. PhD dissertation, Stanford University,Stanford, California, USA (August 2006).
Sahni, I. and Horne, R.N. 2006. Generating Multiple History-MatchedReservoir-Model Realizations Using Wavelets. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (3): 217-226. SPE-89950-PA. doi: 10.2118/89950-PA.
Soliman, M.Y., Ansah, J., Stephenson, S., and Mandal, B. 2003. Applicationof Wavelet Transform to the Analysis of Pressure-Transient Data. SPE ResEval & Eng 6 (2): 89-99. SPE-83670-PA. doi: 10.2118/83670-PA.
Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting andModel Parameter Estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Yunowo, I.P., Susanto, A., and Soesianto, K. 2005. Application of AdaptiveWavelets to Improve Computational Performance of Kriging. Paper SPE 93197presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition,Jakarta, 5-7 April. doi:10.2118/93197-MS.
Zheng, S.-Y. and Li, X.-G. 2007. Analyzing Transient Pressure From PermanentDownhole Gauges (PDG) Using Wavelet Method. Paper SPE 107521 presented at theSPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, London, 11-14 June. doi: 10.2118/107521-MS.