Slickwater Fracturing: Food for Thought
- Terrence T. Palisch (CARBO Ceramics) | Michael Vincent (Insight Consulting) | Patrick J. Handren (Denbury Resources)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 327 - 344
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.3 Coal Seam Gas, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.5.1 Fracture design and containment, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation
- slickwater fracturing, unconventional reservoirs
- 28 in the last 30 days
- 3,178 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The evolution of fracturing technology has provided the industry with numerous advances, ranging from sophisticated fluid systems to tip-screenout designs to propagation modeling. Interestingly, these advances typically have focused on conventional designs that use a crosslinked-fluid system. However, as the development of unconventional (e.g., tight gas, shales, coalbed methane) or underpressured reservoirs has increased, so has the demand for innovative hydraulic-fracture designs. The most recent of these design changes has been the popular method of placing proppant with slickwater, linear gel, or hybrid treatments.
Although our industry has significant expertise in fracture design, most of our experience has been in conventional crosslinked-fluid systems. However, there are many aspects of crosslinked-fluid design that either do not apply to slickwater treatments or, in some cases, are contrary to the requirements of slickwater treatments.
This paper will begin by reviewing the motivation, benefits, and concerns with slickwater fracturing and discuss why this seemingly old method has regained popularity over conventional crosslinked designs in many reservoirs. In addition, the authors will detail some of the important theories related to slickwater fracturing, including fracture width and complexity, proppant transport and settling, and conductivity requirements. In each scenario, emphasis will be placed on the different strategy employed compared to crosslinked-fluid designs, and the mistakes or misunderstandings that are frequently made will be highlighted.
Where appropriate, laboratory testing, field measurements, reference material, and other resources are presented to support the observations made by the authors. This paper will serve as a resource to any engineer or technician who is designing/pumping slickwater fracs, or who is considering this technology for potential application. By applying the concepts presented in this paper, engineers will be able to appropriately evaluate the potential benefits of using this technique in their completions, as well as draw on the experiences of others to take full advantage of this technology.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Anderson, R.W., Cooke, C.E. Jr., and Wendorff, C.L. 1989. Propping Agentsand Fracture Conductivity. In Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing,ed. J.L. Gidley, S.A. Holditch, D.E. Nierode, and R.W. Veatch Jr., Vol. 12,Chap. 6, 109-130. Richardson, Texas: Henry L. Doherty Monograph Series,SPE.
Bastian, P.A., Wirth, O.F.R., Wang, L., and Voneiff, G.W. 2005. Assessment and Development of the DryHorseshoe Canyon CBM Play in Canada. Paper SPE 96899 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. doi:10.2118/96899-MS.
Besler, M.R., Steele, J.W., Egan, T., and Wagner, J. 2007. Improving Well Productivity andProfitability in the Bakken--A Summary of Our Experiences Drilling,Stimulating, and Operating Horizontal Wells. Paper SPE 110679 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA,11-14 November. doi: 10.2118/110679-MS.
Branigan, P.T., Peterson, R.E., Warpinski, N.R., and Wright, T.B. 1996. Characterization of RemotelyIntersected Set of Hydraulic Fractures: Results of Intersection Well No. 1-B,GRI/DOE Multi-Site Project. Paper SPE 36452 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. doi:10.2118/36452-MS.
Brannon, H.D., Malone, M.R., Rickards, A.R., Wood, W.D., Edgeman, J.R., andBryant, J.L. 2004. MaximizingFracture Conductivity With Proppant Partial Monolayers: Theoretical Curiosityor Highly Productivity Reality? Paper SPE 90698 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. doi:10.2118/90698-MS.
Britt, L.K., Smith, M.B., Haddad, Z., Lawrence, P., Chpperfield, S., andHellman, T. 2006. Water-Fracs: WeDo Need Proppant After All. Paper SPE 102227 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. doi:10.2118/102227-MS.
Carbo Ceramics. 2007. http://www.carboceramics.com.
Carman, P.S. and Cawiezel, K.E. 2007. Successful Breaker Optimization forPolyacrylamide Friction Reducers Used in Slickwater Fracturing. Paper SPE106162 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, CollegeStation, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. doi: 10.2118/106162-MS.
Chien, S.-F. 1994. SettlingVelocity of Irregularly Shaped Particles. SPE Drill & Compl 9 (4): 281-289. SPE-26121-PA. doi: 10.2118/26121-PA.
Cipolla, C.L., Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., and Vincent,M.C. 2008. The Relationshipbetween Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture TreatmentDesign. Paper SPE 115769 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Denver, 21-24 September. doi: 10.2118/115769-MS.
Cleary, M.P., Johnson, D.E., Kogsbøll, H-H., Owens, K.A., Perry, K.F., dePater, C.J., Stachel, A., Schmidt, H., and Tambini, M. 1993. Field Implementation of ProppantSlugs To Avoid Premature Screen-Out of Hydraulic Fractures With AdequateProppant Concentration. Paper SPE 25982 presented at the Low PermeabilityReservoirs Symposium, Denver, 26-28 April. doi: 10.2118/25892-MS.
Coulter, G.R., Benton, E.G., and Thomson, C.L. 2004. Water Fracs and Sand Quality: ABarnett Shale Example. Paper SPE 90891 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. doi:10.2118/90891-MS.
Cramer, D.D. 2008. StimulatingUnconventional Reservoirs: Lessons Learned, Successful Practices, Areas forImprovement. Paper SPE 114172 presented at the SPE UnconventionalReservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 10-12 February. doi:10.2118/114172-MS.
Crow, W.L. 1977. Mini MassiveFrac--A Stimulation Technique for Low-Porosity, Low-Permeability Zones.Paper SPE 6627 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania, USA, 27-28 October. doi: 10.2118/6627-MS.
Daneshy, A. 1989. Proppant Transport. In Recent Advances in HydraulicFracturing, ed. J.L. Gidley, S.A. Holditch, D.E. Nierode, and R.W. VeatchJr., Vol. 12, Chap. 10, 210-222. Richardson, Texas: Henry L. Doherty MonographSeries, SPE.
Darin, S.R. and Huitt, J.L. 1960. Effect of Partial Monolayer of ProppingAgent on Fracture Flow Capacity. SPE-1291-G. Trans., AIME, 219:31-37.
Fast, R.E., Murer, A.S., and Timmer, R.S. 1994. Description and Analysis of CoredHydraulic Fractures--Lost Hills Field, Kern County California. SPE Prod& Fac 9 (2): 107-114. SPE-24853-PA. doi:10.2118/24853-PA.
Fisher, M.K., Heinze, J.R., Harris, C.D., Davidson, B.M., Wright, C.A., andDunn, K.P. 2004. OptimizingHorizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using MicroseismicFracture Mapping. Paper SPE 90051 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. doi: 10.2118/90051-MS.
Fredd, C.N., McConnell, S.B., Boney, C.L., and England, K.W. 2001. Experimental Study of FractureConductivity for Water-Fracturing and Conventional Fracturing Applications.SPE J. 6 (3): 288-298. SPE-74138-PA. doi:10.2118/74138-PA.
Ghauri, W.K. 1960. Results ofWell Stimulation by Hydraulic Fracturing and High Rate Oil Backflushing.J Pet Technol 12 (6): 19-27. SPE-1382-PA. doi:10.2118/1382-G.
Gidley, J.L., Holditch, S.A., Nierode, D.E., and Veatch, R.W. Jr. 1989.Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing. Monograph Series, SPE,Richardson, Texas 12.
Gottschling, J.C., Royce, T.N., and Schuck, L.Z. 1985. Nitrogen Gas and Sand: A NewTechnique for Stimulation of Devonian Shale. J Pet Technol 37 (5): 901-907. SPE-12313-PA. doi: 10.2118/12313-PA.
Handren, P. and Palisch, T. 2007. Successful Hybrid SlickwaterFracture Design Evolution--An East Texas Cotton Valley Taylor Case History.Paper SPE 110451 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November. doi:10.2118/110451-MS.
Harper, T.R., Hagan, J.T., and Martins, J.P. 1985. Fracturing Without Proppant.Paper SPE 13858 presented at the SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas ReservoirsSymposium, Denver, 19-22 March. doi: 10.2118/13858-MS.
Howard, G.C. and Fast, C.R. 1970. Hydraulic Fracturing. MonographSeries, SPE, Richardson, Texas 2.
ISO 13503-2:2006, Petroleum and natural gas industries--Completion fluidsand materials--Part 2: Measurement of properties of proppants used in hydraulicfracturing and gravel packing operations. 2006. Geneva, Switzerland:ISO.
Kern, L.R., Perkins, T.K., and Wyant, R.E. 1959. The Mechanics of Sand Movement inFracturing. J Pet Technol 11 (7): 55-57. SPE-1108-G.doi: 10.2118/1108-G.
Lambert, S.W. and Trevits, M.A. 1980. The Feasibility of No-proppantStimulation to Enhance Removal of Methane from the Mary Lee Coalbed. Report ofInvestigations, No. DOE/CMTC/TR-80-1, OSTI ID 5451039, US DOE/Bureau of Mines,Washington, DC (April 1980). .
Leonard, R., Woodroof, R., Bullard, K., Middlebrook, M. and Wilson, R. 2007.Barnett Shale Completions: AMethod for Assessing New Completion Strategies. Paper SPE 110809 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California,USA, 11-14 November. doi: 10.2118/110809-MS.
MacDonald, R.J., Frantz, J.H., Merriam, G.W., and Schlotterbeck, S.T. 2002.Comparing Production Responsesfrom Devonian Shale and Berea Wells Stimulated with Nitrogen Foam and Proppantvs. Nitrogen Only, Pike Co., Kentucky. Paper SPE 77464 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference, 29 September-2 October. doi: 10.2118/77464-MS.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., Youngblood, J.E., and Heinze, J.R. 2006. Integration of Microseismic FractureMapping Results With Numerical Fracture Network Production Modeling in theBarnett Shale. Paper SPE 102103 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. doi:10.2118/102103-MS.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Richardson, M.F., Walker R.N. Jr., Meehan D.N., OehlerM.W., and Browning R.R. Jr. 1997. Proppants? We Don't Need NoProppants. Paper SPE 38611 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5-8 October. doi:10.2118/38611-MS.
Meehan, D.N. 1995. StimulationResults in the Giddings (Austin Chalk) Field. SPE Prod & Fac 10 (2): 96-102. SPE 24783-PA. doi: 10.2118/24783-PA.
Palisch, T., Duenckel, R., Bazan, L., Heidt, H.J., and Turk, G. 2007. Determining Realistic FractureConductivity and Understanding Its Impact on Well Performance--Theory and FieldExamples. Paper SPE 106301 presented at the SPE Hydraulic FracturingTechnology Conference, College Station, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. doi:10.2118/106301-MS.
Palisch, T.T., Griffin, L.G., and Weng, X. 1996. Proppantless Fracture Stimulations inInjection Wells--A Case History. Paper SPE 35697 presented at the SPEWestern Regional Meeting, Anchorage, 22-24 May. doi: 10.2118/35697-MS.
Palmer, I.D. 1992. Review ofCoalbed Methane Well Stimulation. Paper SPE 22395 presented at theInternational Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, 24-27 March. doi:10.2118/22395-MS.
Parker, M., Glasbergen, van Batenburg, D., Weaver, J., and Slabaugh, B.2005. High-Porosity FracturesYield High Conductivity. Paper SPE 96848 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. doi:10.2118/96848-MS.
Patankar, N.A., Joseph, D.D., Wang, J., Barree., R. Conway, M., and Asadi,M. 2002. Power lawcorrelations for sediment transport in pressure driven channel flows.International Journal of Multiphase Flow 28 (8): 1269-1292.doi:10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00030-7.
Pearson, C.M., Lynch, K.W., Schmidt, J.H., and McCaslin, N.F. 1988. Improvement of Massive HydraulicFracture Treatments in the Cotton Valley Formation of East Texas. Paper SPE17714 presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Dallas, June 13-15. doi:10.2118/17714-MS.
Peck, C. 1999. Review ofCoalbed Methane Development in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming/Montana.Paper SPE 55801 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Gillette,Wyoming, USA, 15-18 May. doi: 10.2118/55801-MS.
Perkins, T.K. and Kern, L.R. 1961. Widths of Hydraulic Fractures. JPet Technol 13 (9): 937-949; Trans., AIME, 222.SPE-89-PA. doi: 10.2118/89-PA.
Rieb, B. 2006. Proppants raise the curve for coalbed methane production.World Oil (August).
Rieb, B.A. and Leshchyshyn, T.T. 2005. The Production Success of ProppantStimulation on Horseshoe Canyon Coalbed Methane and Sandstone CommingledWells. Paper SPE 96864 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference,Dallas, 9-12 October. doi: 10.2118/96864-MS.
Rushing, J.A. and Sullivan, R.B. 2003. Evaluation of a Hybrid Water FracStimulation Technology in Bossier Tight Gas Sand Play. SPE Paper 84394presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8October. doi: 10.2118/84394-MS.
Schein, G. 2005. The Application and Technology of Slickwater Fracturing.Paper SPE 108807 presented as a Distinguished Lecture during the 2004-2005season.
Schlumberger. 2006. Well Services Field Data Handbook (i-Handbook), version1,0,4,2. http://www.slb.com/content/services/resources/software/ihandbook.asp?entry=oilfield/ihandbook&.
Sharma, M.M. 2005. Advanced Fracturing Technology for Tight Gas: An EastTexas Field Demonstration. DOE Final Report 2001-2004, Contract No.DE-FC26-01NT41326, US DOE/NETL, Morgantown, West Virginia (March 2005).
Steidl, P.F. 1991. Observations of induced fractures intercepted by miningin the Warrior basin, Alabama. Topical Report GRI-91/0327, Gas ResearchInstitute, Chicago, Illinois.
Stidham, J.E., Tetrick, L.T., and Glenn, S.A. 2001. Nitrogen Coiled Tubing Fracturing inthe Appalachian Basin. Paper SPE 72382 presented at the SPE EasternRegional Meeting, Canton, Ohio, USA, 17-19 October. doi: 10.2118/72382-MS.
Stim-Lab. 2007. Notes on the investigation of the effects of fracturingfluids upon the conductivity of proppants, proppant flowback and fluidleak-off, 1986-2007. Annual report, Stim-Lab Proppant and Fluid Consortia,Duncan, Oklahoma.
Sun Drilling Products Corp. 2008. FracBlack HP® Ultra Lightweight ProppantTechnology, http://www.sundrilling.com/fracblack.htm.
Veatch, R.W. Jr., Moschovidis, Z.A., and Fast, C.R. 1989. An Overview ofHydraulic Fracturing. In Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing, ed.J.L. Gidley, S.A. Holditch, D.E. Nierode, and R.W. Veatch Jr., Vol. 12, Chap.1, 1-38. Richardson, Texas: Henry L. Doherty Monograph Series, SPE.
Vincent, M.C. 2002. ProvingIt--A Review of 80 Published Field Studies Demonstrating the Importance ofIncreased Fracture Conductivity. Paper SPE 77675 presented at the AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2October. doi: 10.2118/77675-MS.
Vincent, M.C., Huckabee, P., and Conway, M. 2007. Field Trial Design and Analyses ofProduction Data From a Tight Gas Reservoir: Detailed Production ComparisonsFrom the Pinedale Anticline. Paper SPE 106151 presented at the HydraulicFracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, USA, 29-31 January.doi: 10.2118/106151-MS.
Vincent, M.C., Miller, H.B., Milton-Tayler, D., and Kaufman, P.B. 2004. Erosion by Proppant: A Comparison ofthe Erosivity of Sand and Ceramic Proppants during Slurry Injection andFlowback of Proppant. Paper SPE 90604 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. doi: 10.2118/90604-MS.
Walker, R.N. Jr., Hunter, J.L., Brake, A.C., Fagin, P.A., and Steinsberger,N. 1998. Proppants, We Still Don'tNeed No Proppants--A Perspective of Several Operators. Paper SPE 49106presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,27-30 September. doi: 10.2118/49106-MS.
Warpinksi, N.R. 1991. HydraulicFracturing in Tight, Fissured Media. J Pet Technol 43(2): 146-151; Trans., AIME, 291. SPE-20154-PA. doi:10.2118/20154-PA.
Warpinksi, N.R., Lorenz, J.C., Branagan, P.T., Myal, F.R., and Gall, B.L.1993. Examination of a CoredHydraulic Fracture in a Deep Gas Well. SPE Prod & Fac 8 (3): 150-158; Trans., AIME, 295. SPE-22876-PA.doi: 10.2118/22876-PA.
Warpinski, N.R. and Teufel, L.W. 1987. Influence of Geologic Discontinuitieson Hydraulic Fracture Propagation. J Pet Technol 39(2): 209-220; Trans., AIME, 283. SPE-13224-PA. doi:10.2118/13224-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Kramm, R.C., Heinze, J.R., and Waltman, C.K. 2005. Comparison of Single- and Dual-ArrayMicroseismic Mapping Techniques in the Barnett Shale. Paper SPE 95568presented at the SPE Annual Technology Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12October. doi: 10.2118/95568-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., Vincent, M.C., Cipolla, C.L., and Lolon,E.P. 2008. StimulatingUnconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing FractureConductivity. Paper SPE 114173 presented at the SPE UnconventionalReservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 10-12 February. doi:10.2118/114173-MS.
Weijers, L. 1995. The near-wellbore geometry of hydraulic fracturesinitiated from horizontal and deviated wells. PhD thesis, Delft University ofTechnology, Delft, The Netherlands (February 1995).