CFD Verification of Engineering Options for Mitigating Liquid Sloshing in Topside Vessels on a Floating Production Facility
- Yaojun Lu (FMC Technologies) | Shuhong Chai (Oceanic Consulting Corporation)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
- Publication Date
- September 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 113 - 120
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.5.3 Floating Production Systems, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems
- numerical simulation, oil/gas/processing vessel, wave motion, floating production platform, liquid sloshing
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 290 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper proposes an active-control concept that mitigates the liquid sloshing in a topside vessel by reducing the excitation source, thus extending the scope of sloshing mitigation. To verify the concept proposed, sloshing response in partially liquid-filled topside vessels was numerically investigated under various wave and vessel conditions.
This study confirmed that vessel location on the top deck exhibits a weak correlation with the sloshing response. Although liquid sloshing is not very sensitive to the vessel location, it is beneficial to place the topside processing vessels as close as possible to gravity center of the floating production facilities (FPS/FPSO). It is evident that liquid sloshing in a topside vessel is closely related to the incident direction of the wave. The perpendicular incidence results in the minimum sloshing response; the parallel incidence leads to the maximum sloshing response. It is, therefore, essential to properly orient the vessel to establish perpendicular or close-to-perpendicular incidence status. It is also verified that liquid sloshing is significantly increased with length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio of a vessel. The horizontal vessels with larger L/D suffer from severe liquid sloshing. Because vertical vessels have a minimum L/D = 1.0, they always exhibit better antisloshing performance than the horizontal vessels. In addition, it is advisable to prevent a vessel from operating near the resonance-wave condition.
Although the active control concept shows attractive advantages over the conventional approach, it is more feasible for layout of topside vessels on a newly built FPS/FPSO. Because most of the floating-production systems are not built from scratch such that the topside processing vessels can be placed in the optimal position and orientation but are retrofitted for a topside vessel to fit onto a limited deck space, the passive-control approach may be more applicable. Generally, combination of the active and passive approaches should be considered to minimize liquid sloshing in a topside process vessel.
|File Size||629 KB||Number of Pages||8|
Abramson, H.N. and Garza, L.R. 1964. Some measurements of the effects ofring baffles in cylindrical tanks. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets1 (5): 560-562. doi:10.2514/3.27699.
Abramson, H.N. and Garza, L.R. 1965. Liquid frequencies and damping incompartmented cylindrical tanks. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 2 (3): 453-455. doi:10.2514/3.28203.
API RP 14J, Design and Hazard Analysis for Offshore ProductionFacilities, second edition. 2001. Washington, DC: API.
API RP 2FPS, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing andConstruction of Floating Production Systems. 2001. Washington, DC: API.
API RP 75, Recommended Practice for Development of a Safety andEnvironmental Management Program for Offshore Operations and Facilities,third edition. 2004. Washington, DC: API.
Frankiewicz, T. and Lee, C.-M. 2002. Using Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) Simulation to Model Fluid Motion in Process Vessels on Fixed and FloatingPlatforms. Paper SPE 77494 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 Septemper-2 October. doi:10.2118/77494-MS.
Hirt, C.R. and Nichols, B.D. 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF)method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of ComputationalPhysics 39 (1): 201-225. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.
Lee, C.-M., van Dijk, E., Legg, M., and Byeseda, J. 2004. Field Confirmation of CFD Design forFPSO-mounted Separator. Paper OTC 16137 presented at the OffshoreTechnology Conference, Houston, 3-6 May. doi: 10.4043/16137-MS.
Shyy, W., Thakur, S.S., Ouyang, H., Liu, J., and Blosch, E. 1997.Computational Techniques for Complex Transport Phenomena. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Stanbridge, D. and Oxley, M. 2004. Fundamentals of 2 and 3-Phase SeparatorDesign for Moving and Fixed Platforms. Presented at the Advances in MultiphaseSeparation and Multiphase Pumping Technologies Seminar, Aberdeen, 30 July-1July.
Warnitchai, P. and Pinkaew, T. 1998. Modelling of liquidsloshing in rectangular tanks with flow-dampening devices. EngineeringStructures 20 (7): 593-600.doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00068-0.
Wilkes, J.O. 2005. Fluid Mechanics for Chemical Engineers, secondedition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall PTR.
Worldwide Survey of Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO)Units. 2007. Offshore 67 (8).