Sand on Demand: A Laboratory Investigation on Improving Productivity in Horizontal Wells Under Heavy-Oil Primary Production
- Brígida Inmaculada Meza-Díaz (Alberta Innovates Technology Futures) | Ronald P. Sawatzky (Alberta Innovates Technology Futures) | Ergun Kuru (University of Alberta) | Kaz Oldakowski (AITF)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 240 - 252
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.11 Cold Heavy Oil Production (CHOPS), 1.2.3 Rock properties, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control
- reservoir engineering
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 680 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The cold-production recovery process, also known as cold heavy-oil production with sand (CHOPS), is a method for enhancing primary heavy-oil production by aggressively producing sand (massively and persistently). It is a successful commercial recovery process in western Canada using vertical (or slanted or deviated) wells. Applications of cold-production technology with aggressive sand production in horizontal wells, however, have not met with commercial success.
This paper presents the results of experiments performed to assess the feasibility of applying cold heavy-oil production with horizontal wells using less-aggressive (i.e., controlled) sand-production strategies. Specifically, the effects of slot size, confining stress, fluid velocity, and sand-grain sorting on sand production have been investigated.
Preliminary results indicate that slot-size selection is critical for establishing "sand on demand." For proper slot-size selection, it is essential to know the grain-size distribution of the sand--in particular, attributes such as the size of the coarsest fraction of the sand and the sorting (uniformity coefficient) of the sand. For example, it was observed in the sand-production experiments that the critical pressure gradient for maintaining continuous sand production is much lower for well-sorted sands (narrow size distribution) than for poorly sorted sands (wide size distribution). Ultimately, poorly sorted sands may require criteria different from those for well-sorted sands for slot-size selection.
Flow rates are also crucial for managing sand production because a critical pressure gradient is required for initiating sand production and maintaining continuous sand production. The critical pressure gradient decreases as the slot width or confining pressure increases. Large permeability increases were observed in the sand-production region. Persistent sand production led to the growth of a channel and/or the presence of a dilated zone that had an elliptic shape.
|File Size||940 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Bennett, C., Gilchrist, J.M., Pitoni, E., Burton, R.C., Hodge, R.M.,Troncoso, J., Ali, S.A., Dickerson, R., Price-Smith, C., and Parlar, M. 2000.Design Methodology for Selection of Horizontal Openhole Sand ControlCompletions Supported by Case Histories. Paper SPE 65140 presented at the SPEEuropean Petroleum Conference, Paris, 24-25 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/65140-MS.
Boone, T.J., Smith, R.J., and Galway, R. 1997. Sand Packing LinerCompletions in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper presented at the 6th Annual One-DaySPE/CIM Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, 12 November.
Chugh, S., Baker, R., Telesford, A., and Zhang, E. 1997. Mainstream Optionsfor Heavy Oil: Part I--Cold Production. Paper 97-99 presented at the AnnualTechnical Meeting, Calgary, 8-11 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97-99.
Cleary, M.P., Melvan, J.J., and Kohlhaas, C.A. 1979. The Effect of ConfiningStress and Fluid Properties on Arch Stability in Unconsolidated Sands. PaperSPE 8426 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, LasVegas, Nevada, USA, 23-26 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8426-MS.
Dullien, F.A.L. 1975. Single phase flow through porous media and porestructure. The Chemical Engineering Journal 10 (1): 1-34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(75)88013-0.
Harr, M.E. 1992. Groundwater and Seepage. New York: DoverPublications.
Huang, W.S., Marcum B.E., Chase, M.R., and Yu, C.L. 1998. Cold Production ofHeavy Oil From Horizontal Wells in the Frog Lake Field. SPE Res Eval &Eng 1 (6): 551-555. SPE-52636-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/52636-PA.
Metwally, M. and Solanki, S. 1995. Heavy Oil Reservoir Mechanisms, Lindberghand Frog Lake Fields, Alberta. Part I: Field Observation and ReservoirSimulation. Paper 95-63 presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary,14-17 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95-63.
Meza, B. 2001. Experimental Investigation of Sand Production into aHorizontal Well Slot. MSc dissertation, School of Mining and PetroleumEngineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Meza-Díaz, B., Tremblay, B., and Doan, Q. 2003. Mechanisms of SandProduction Through Horizontal Well Slots in Primary Production. J Can PetTechnol 42 (10): 36-46. JCPT Paper No. 03-10-04. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/03-10-04.
Meza-Díaz, B., Tremblay, B., and Doan, Q. 2004. Visualization of SandStructures Surrounding a Horizontal Well Slot During Cold Production. J CanPet Technol 43 (12): 39-48. JCPT Paper No. 04-12-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/04-12-02.
Miller, W.G. 1994. Sand Flow Mechanisms at Well Casing Perforations. MScdissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton,Alberta.
National Energy Board (NEB). 2008. Crude Oil and Petroleum ProductsStatistics and Reporting Forms, http://www.neb.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/sttstc/crdlndptrlmprdct/crdlndptrlmprdct-eng.html(accessed 09 June 2008).
Penberthy, W.L. Jr. and Shaughnessy, C.M. 2002. Sand Control, fourthedition, Vol. 1. Richardson, Texas: SPE Series on Special Topics, SPE.
Sawatzky, R.P., Lillico, D.A. , London, M.J., Tremblay, B.R., and Coates,R.M. 2002. Tracking cold production footprints. Presented at the PetroleumSociety's Canadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC), Calgary, 11-13June.
Selby, R.J. and Farouq Ali, S.M. 1988. Mechanics of Sand Production and theFlow of Fines in Porous Media. J Can Pet Technol 27 (3).JCPT Paper No. 88-03-05. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88-03-05.
Stein, N., Odeh, A.S., and Jones, L.G. 1974. Estimating Maximum Sand-FreeProduction Rates From Friable Sands for Different Well Completion Geometries.J Pet Technol 26 (10): 1156-1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4534-PA.
Tippie, D.B. and Kohlhaas, C.A. 1973. Effect of Flow Rate on Stability ofUnconsolidated Producing Sands. Paper SPE 4533 presented at the Fall Meeting ofthe Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 30September-3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4533-MS.
Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., and Forshner, K. 1998. Modelling of SandProduction from Wells on Primary Recovery. J Can Pet Technol 37 (3): 41-50. JCPT Paper No. 98-03-03. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98-03-03.
Tremblay, B., Sedgwick, G., and Vu, D. 1999. A Review of Cold Production inHeavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper presented at the10th European Symposium on ImprovedOil Recovery, Brighton, UK, 18-20 August.
Yim, K., Dusseault, M.B., and Zhang, L. 1994. Experimental Study of SandProduction Processes Near an Orifice. Paper SPE 28068 presented at the RockMechanics in Petroleum Engineering SPE/ISRM International Conference (EUROCK'94), Delft, The Netherlands, 29-31 August. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28068-MS.
Yuan, Y. 2000. Abacus Simulation on Near Well Bore Stresses and Deformationin Heavy Oil Reservoirs in Response to Rapid Pressure Drawdown. TechnicalReport, Alberta Research Council, Edmonton, Alberta (November 2000).