Model-Based Monitoring and Leak Detection in Oil and Gas Pipelines
- Espen Hauge (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) | Ole Morten Aamo (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) | John-Morten Godhavn (StatoilHydro ASA)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
- Publication Date
- September 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 53 - 60
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.2.2 Pipeline Transient Behavior, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.3.4 Scale
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 839 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
An adaptive Luenberger-type estimator for the purpose of monitoring flow conditions and locating and quantifying leakages in petroleum pipelines is presented. The estimator only needs measurements of velocity, pressure, and temperature at the inlet and velocity and pressure at the outlet to function. The measurements are used to form a special set of boundary conditions for the estimator that ensures fast convergence of the estimation error. Depending only on measurements from inlet and outlet makes it possible to use OLGA, which is a state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics simulator, to govern the one-phase fluid flow of the estimator. The estimator is tested with both a straight, horizontal pipeline and an actual, long pipeline with inclinations, and both simulations with oil and gas are carried out. In order to cope with modeling errors and biased measurements, estimation of roughness in the monitored pipeline is introduced.
The benefits of a leak-detection system capable of locating the position of the leak are obviously of an environmental kind. But the economical aspect of it is also important. Leak detection based on dynamic modeling is a propitious approach in the special field of leak quantification and location. There have been numerous studies on model-based leak detection. We mention here the most relevant ones with regard to our work. Based on a discretized pipe flow model, Billmann and Isermann (1987) designed an estimator with friction adaptation. In the event of a leak, the outputs from the estimator differ from the measurements, and this is exploited in a correlation technique that detects, quantifies and locates the leak. Verde (2001) used a bank of estimators, computed by the method for fault detection and isolation developed by Hou and Müller (1994). The underlying model is a linearized, discretized pipe flow model on a grid of N nodes. The estimators are designed in such a way that all but one will react to a leak. Which one of the N estimators that does not react to the leak depends on the position of the leak, and this is the mechanism by which the leak is located. The outputs of the remaining estimators are used for quantifying the leak. The bank of estimators are computed using the recursive numerical procedure suggested by Hou and Müller (1994); however, it was shown in Salvesen (2005) that because of the simple structure of the discretized model, the estimators may be written explicitly. This is important, because it removes the need for recomputing the bank of estimators when the operating point of the pipeline is changed. Verde (2004) also proposed a nonlinear version, using an extremely coarse discretization grid. Several companies offer commercial solutions to pipeline monitoring with leak detection. Fantoft (2005) uses a transient model approach in conjunction with the commercial pipeline simulator OLGA2000, while EFA Technologies (1987, 1990, 1991) uses an event detection method that looks for signatures of no-leak to leak transitions in the measurements. The detection method of Verde (2001) using a bank of estimators can potentially detect multiple leaks. However, multiple simultaneous leaks is an unlikely event, so the complex structure of a bank of N estimators seems unnecessary. Aamo et al. (2006) instead employed ideas from adaptive control, treating the mass rate and location of a single point leak as constant unknown parameters in an adaptive Luenberger-type estimator based on a set of two coupled 1D first-order nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations. Heuristic update laws for adaptation of the friction coefficient, mass rate of the leak, and position of the leak were suggested. The method was developed further by Hauge et al. (2007) who remodeled the leak as a pressure- and density-dependent function, thereby improving the leak-detection capability during transient flow such as for instance pipeline shut-down.
In this paper, we continue the development by employing the state-of-the-art multiphase flow simulator OLGA? as the underlying flow model, enabling more accurate flow predictions for complex pipeline conditions and thereby further improving the leak detection capability of our approach. The simulator is manipulated through MATLAB to work as an adaptive Luenberger-type estimator using measurements from the supervised pipeline. Because the only measurements fed into the estimator are velocity and pressure from the outlet and velocity, pressure, and temperature from the inlet, which in most cases already are available, the method can be used with most existing pipelines without additional instrumentation. Also, the OLGA simulator, which is the backbone of the estimator, is widely used in the petroleum industry. Our approach allows for easily turning an existing OLGA model of a real pipeline into a monitoring system, including leak-detection capabilities.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Aamo, O.M., Salvesen, J., and Foss, B.A. 2006. Observer design usingboundary injections for pipeline monitoring and leak detection. Proc.,2006 International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, Gamado,Brazil, 2-5 April, Vol. 6, Part 1.
Billmann, L. and Isermann, R. 1987. Leak detection methodsfor pipelines. Automatica 23 (3): 381-385.doi:10.1016/0005-1098(87)90011-2.
D-SPICE overview: Production management systems. 2005. Houston, Texas:Fantoft Process Technologies.
EFA, Inc. 1987. Events at a leak. Technical paper available from EFATechnologies, Sacramento, California, http://www.efatech.com/technicalpapers.html.
EFA, Inc. 1990. Effect of pressure measurement resolution on PPA™ leakdetection. Technical paper available from EFA Technologies, Sacramento,California, http://www.efatech.com/technicalpapers.html.
EFA, Inc. 1991. PPA event suppression capability. Technical paper availablefrom EFA Technologies, Sacramento, California, http://www.efatech.com/technicalpapers.html.
Hauge, E., Aamo, O.M., and Godhavn, J.-M. 2007. Model based pipelinemonitoring with leak detection. Proc., 7th IFAC Symposium on NonlinearControl Systems, Pretoria, South Africa, 22-24 August.
Hou, M. and Müller, P.C. 1994. Fault detection andisolation observers. International Journal of Control60 (5): 827-846. doi:10.1080/00207179408921497.
Nieckele, A.O., Brage, A.M.B., and Azevedo L.F.A. 2001. Transient Pig Motion Through Gas andLiquid Pipelines. Journal of Energy Resources Technology123 (4): 260-269. doi:10.1115/1.1413466.
Salvesen, J. 2005. Leak Detection by Estimation in an Oil Pipeline. MScthesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim,Norway.
Verde, C. 2001. Multi-leak detection andisolation in fluid pipelines. Control Engineering Practice9 (6): 673-682. doi:10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00026-0.
Verde, C. 2004. Minimal OrderNonlinear Observer for Leak Detection. Journal of Dynamic Systems,Measurements and Control 126 (3): 467-472.doi:10.1115/1.1789533.