Using Experimental Designs, Assisted History-Matching Tools, and Bayesian Framework To Get Probabilistic Gas-Storage Pressure Forecasts
- Thomas Schaaf (GDF SUEZ) | Bertrand Coureaud (GDF SUEZ) | Nicolas Labat (GDF SUEZ) | Daniel Busby (Institut Français du Pétrole)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- October 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 724 - 736
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- assisted history matching, proxy, bayesian
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 914 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
One of the main concerns in the oil and gas business is generating reliable reservoir hydrodynamics forecasts. Such profiles are the cornerstones of optimal technico-economical management decisions. A workflow combining different methods to integrate and reduce most of the subsurface uncertainties using multiple history matched models (explaining the past) to infer reasonably reliable forecasts is proposed.
A sensitivity study is first performed using experimental design to scan the whole range of static and dynamic uncertainty parameters using a proxy model of the fluid-flow simulator. Only the most sensitive ones with respect to an objective function (OF) (quantifying the mismatch between the simulation results and the observations) are retained for subsequent steps.
Assisted history-matching tools are then used to obtain multiple history-matched models.
To obtain probabilistic pressure profiles, multiple history-matched models are combined with the uncertain parameters not retained in the sensitivity study, using the joint modeling method.
Another way to constrain uncertain parameters with observation data is to use Bayesian framework where a posteriori distributions of the input parameters are derived from the a priori distributions and the likelihood function. The latter is computed through a nonlinear proxy model using experimental design, kriging, and dynamic training techniques.
These two workflows have been applied to a real gas storage case submitted to significant seasonal pressure variations. The obtained probabilistic operational pressure profiles for a given period are then compared to the actual gas storage dynamic behavior so that we can compare the two approaches and assess the added value of both proposed workflows.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Barker, J.W., Cuypers, M., and Holden, L. 2001. Quantifying Uncertainty in ProductionForecasts: Another Look at the PUNQ-S3 Problem. SPE J.6 (4): 433-441. SPE-74707-PA. doi: 10.2118/74707-PA.
Busby, D. and Feraille, M. 2008. Adaptive design ofexperiments for calibration of complex simulators--An application touncertainty quantification of a mature oil field. Journal of Physics:Conference Series 135: 012026. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/135/1/012026.
Busby, D., Farmer, C.L., and Iske, A. 2007. Hierarchical Nonlinear Approximationfor Experimental Design and Statistical Data Fitting. SIAM J. Sci.Comput. 29 (1): 49-69. doi:10.1137/050639983.
Bustamante, D.S., Keller, D.R., and Monson, G.D. 2005. Understanding Reservoir Performanceand Uncertainty Using a Multiple History Matching Process . Paper SPE 95401presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12October. doi: 10.2118/95401-MS.
Choudhary, M.K., Yoon, S., and Ludvigsen, B.E. 2007. Application of Global OptimizationMethods for History Matching and Probabilistic Forecasting--Case Studies.Paper SPE 105208 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show andConference, Bahrain, 11-14 March. doi: 10.2118/105208-MS.
CONDOR Research Prototype v2.1 User's Guide. 2007. Rueil-Malmaison, France:Institut Français du Pétrole.
COUGAR v2007.2 User's Guide. 2007. Rueil-Malmaison, France: InstitutFrançais du Pétrole.
COUGAR_Opt™ v.2008.1 prototype software. 2008. Rueil-Malmaison, France:Cougar III Joint Industrial Project, IFP Consortium.
Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A. 1992. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Libraryand User's Guide, 111. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fenwick, D.H. and Roggero, F. 2003. Updating Stochastic Reservoir ModelsWith New Production Data. Paper SPE 84467 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. doi:10.2118/84467-MS.
Feraille, M. and Roggero, F. 2004. Uncertainty Quantification for MatureField Combining the Bayesian Inversion Formalism and Experimental DesignApproach. Proc., 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of OilRecovery, Cannes, France, 30 August-2 September.
Feraille, M., Manceau, E., Zabalza-Mezghani, I., Roggero, F., Hu, L.-Y., andCosta Reis, L. 2003a. Integration of Dynamic Data in a Mature Oil FieldReservoir Model to Reduce the Uncertainty on Production Forecasting. Presentedat the AAPG Annual Convention, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 11-14 May.
Feraille, M., Roggero, F., Manceau, E., Hu, L.Y., Zabalza-Mezghani, I., andCost Reis, L. 2003b. Applicationof Advanced History Matching Techniques to an Integrated Field Case Study.Paper SPE 84463 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. doi: 10.2118/84463-MS.
Hu. L.Y. and Blanc, G. 1998. Constraining a Reservoir Facies Model toDynamic Data Using a Gradual Deformation Method. Paper B-01 presented at ECMORVI, Peebles, Scotland, 8-11 September.
Kitandis, P.K. 1995. Quasi-Linear Geostatistical Theoryfor Inversing. Water Resources Research 31 (10):2411-2419. doi:10.1029/95WR01945.
Landa, J.L. and Güyagüler, B. 2003. A Methodology for History Matchingand the Assessment of Uncertainties Associated With Flow Prediction. PaperSPE 84465 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, 5-8 October. doi: 10.2118/84465-MS.
Manceau, E., Mezghani, M., Zabalza-Mezghani, I., and Roggero, R. 2001. Combination of Experimental Designand Joint Modeling Methods for Quantifying the Risk Associated WithDeterministic and Stochastic Uncertainties--An Integrated Test Study. PaperSPE 71620 presented at the SPE Annual Conference and Technical Exhibition, NewOrleans, 30 September-3 October. doi: 10.2118/71620-MS.
Mezghani, M. and Roggero, F. 2004. Combining Gradual Deformation andUpscaling Techniques for Direct Conditioning of Fine-Scale Reservoir Models toInterference Test Data. SPE J. 9 (1): 79-87.SPE-87843-PA. doi: 10.2118/87843-PA.
Oliver, D.S., He, N., and Reynolds, A.C. 1996. Conditioning permeabilityfields to pressure data. Proc., 5th European Conference on theMathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR V), Leoben, Austria, 3-6 September,1-11.
Ory, J., Guedeney, K., Brefort, B., and Schirrer, L. 1997. A Semi-Automatic History MatchingTechnique Applied to Aquifer Gas Storages. Paper SPE 38862 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5-8October. doi: 10.2118/38862-MS.
Roggero, F. and Hu, L.Y. 1998. Gradual Deformation of ContinuousGeostatistical Models for History-Matching. Paper SPE 49004 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30September. doi: 10.2118/49004-MS.
Roggero, F., Ding, D.Y., Berthet, P., Lerat, O., Cap, J., and Schreiber,P.E. 2007. Matching of ProductionHistory and 4D Seismic Data--Application to the Girassol Field, OffshoreAngola. Paper SPE 109929 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November. doi:10.2118/109929-MS.
Schaaf, T., Martin, A., Coureaud, B., and Clay, C. 2006. History Matching of a Tight GasReservoir Stochastic Model Using Semiautomated Methods. Paper SPE 100249presented at the 2006 SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition,Vienna, Austria, 12-15 June. doi: 10.2118/100249-MS.
Schaaf, T., Mezghani, M., and Chavent, G. 2003. In Search of an OptimalParameterization: An Innovative Approach to Reservoir Data Integration.Paper SPE 84273 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. doi: 10.2118/84273-MS.
Scheidt, C., Zabalza-Mezghani, I., Feraille, M., Guard, B., and Collombier,D. 2006. Adaptive Experimental Design for Non-Linear Modeling--Application toQuantification of Risk for Real Field Production. Proc., 10th EuropeanConference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Amsterdam, 4-7 September.
Schulze-Riegert, R., Krosche, M., Fahimuddin, A., and Ghedan, S. 2007. Multiobjective Optimization WithApplication to Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification. Paper SPE105313 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference,Bahrain, 11-14 March. doi: 10.2118/105313-MS.
Selberg, S., Schulze-Riegert, R., and Stekolschikov, K. 2007. Event-Targeting Model CalibrationUsed for History Matching Large Simulation Cases. Paper SPE 106044presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 26-28 February.doi: 10.2118/106044-MS.
Tarantola, A. 2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for ModelParameter Estimation. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: SIAM.
Tavassoli, Z., Carter, J.N., and King, P.R. 2005. An analysis of historymatching errors. Computational Geosciences 9 (2-3):99-123. doi:10.1007/s10596-005-9001-7.
Tavassoli, Z., Carter, J.N., and King, R.P. 2004. Errors in History Matching.SPE J. 9 (3): 352-361. SPE-86883-PA. doi:10.2118/86883-PA.
Yang, C., Nghiem, L., Card, C., and Bremeier, M. 2007. Reservoir Model UncertaintyQuantification Through Computer-Assisted History Matching. Paper SPE 109825presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim,California, USA, 11-14 November. doi: 10.2118/109825-MS.
Zabalza, I., Dejean J., Collombier, D., and Blanc, G. 1998. Prediction andDensity Estimation of a Horizontal Well Productivity Index using GeneralizedLinear Models. Paper B31 presented at ECMOR VI, Peebles, Scotland, 8-11September.