Experience in Gravel Packing Long, Perforated Intervals in Deviated Holes (includes associated papers 12886 and 13309 )
- J. van Ballegooyen | Kiat Tan Giap | Kong Tan Seng
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- November 1983
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,079 - 2,086
- 1983. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 2.2.2 Perforating, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.6.8 Well Performance Monitoring, Inflow Performance, 2 Well Completion, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 3.2.4 Acidising, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 1.14 Casing and Cementing
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 125 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper presents the philosophy, criteria, and technique used in arriving at the gravel-packing method for Sabah Shell Petroleum Co. Ltd.'s(SSPC's) operations. It also analyzes and discusses problems and efforts to resolve them with the aid of an evaluation tool.
All the gravel-packing operations were done in the South Furious field completions. The field is located offshore northwest Borneo, some 120 miles northeast of Labuan Island. The completion intervals comprise a series of interbedded sands and shales with porosities between 20 and 30% and permeabilities of 100 to 500 md. Hydrocarbon occurrences vary from 1,100 to 7,600 ft subsea (ss). Local experiences pointed out the need to gravel-pack most of the proposed completions. Previous efforts at gravel-packing intervals, typically of less than 50 ft, had been satisfactory. However, premature screenouts were noted in intervals that were initially only some 100 ft long. The difficulties increased with increasing interval length(single gross interval of 653 ft being the longest) and deviation angle(maximum of 52deg.) and also with differences in the permeabilities of the different sand layers. To understand the nature of the problem, a neutron log was used to locate the position of the gravel and the presence of voids.
The placement technique was modified by trial and error until an acceptable technique was achieved. This paper discusses the evolution of this technique.
The limited areal extent of the sands, which stacked to form very long hydrocarbon columns, resulted in completions across large groups of sands having common pressure regimes. Two-phase vertical-flow calculations indicated optimal tubing size to be 3 1/2 in. We set 9 5/8-in. casing across completion intervals with 4 1/2- and 6 1/8-in. wire- wrapped screens(WWS) across bottom and subsequent intervals. The coupling of the 3 1/2-in. tubing restricted the use of the 4 1/2-in. screen to the bottom interval. The internal gravel-pack technique was preferred over underreamed gravel pack because of greater flexibility, satisfactory inflow performance (local experience), and shorter installation time. To alleviate the need for future recompletions and high workover costs. all possible oil sands were included in the initial completion. To ensure seal integrity and minimize complexity, there was a maximum of only four zones per well.
Sand Failure Criteria
Experience in northwest Borneo indicated that sand control is required for zones with sonic transit times At >90 usec/ft. In South Furious field, this was placed at +5,000 ft ss.
|File Size||584 KB||Number of Pages||10|