Advances in Deepwater and Ultradeepwater Pipeline Route Selection
- Nigel P. Tootill (Intec Engineering Partnership Ltd.) | Michael P. Vandenbossche (BP plc) | Martin L. Morrison (Intec Engineering Partnership Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction
- Publication Date
- March 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1 - 4
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.5.5 Installation Equipment and Techniques, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 4.5.10 Remotely Operated Vehicles, 4.2.4 Risers
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 326 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The selection of pipeline routes and the location of the associated tie-in structures require detailed knowledge of the seabed conditions and shallow geology. The areas along the routes and the areas regionally around the routes must be accurately surveyed. This is especially important for the complex geology and seabed topography found in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
The Mardi Gras project used an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) to provide high-quality survey data. These data allowed the project to make decisions with a high degree of confidence regarding pipeline routing, ultimately leading to successful installation of the Mardi Gras pipelines.
BP and its partners are developing several deepwater prospects in the Gulf of Mexico. These include the Holstein, Mad Dog, Thunder Horse, and Atlantis floating production facilities in water depths ranging from 4,500 to 7,300 ft; see Fig. 1. Oil and gas will be exported by means of the Mardi Gras Transportation System. The deepwater segment of Mardi Gras consists of oil and gas pipelines and steel catenary risers with diameters ranging from 16 to 28 in.
The process of selecting a pipeline route is a complex one. The factors involved can be grouped into three main categories: primary, secondary, and cost. Primary factors include the location of the host (start) and destination (end) of the pipeline and installation parameters that may affect route geometry. Secondary factors include bathymetry, seafloor character, subseabed geology, geohazards, bioenvironmental issues, and existing infrastructure. The final factor, which is distinct from these two groups, is cost. Shorter pipelines cost less; therefore, the challenge for any pipeline route-selection team is to find the shortest route while conforming to the requirements set up by the primary and secondary factors.
Examples of geohazards that may be encountered include: steep slopes, unstable slopes, hard seabed sediments, bedforms, and environmentally sensitive areas. The most well-known environmentally sensitive areas are the biological assemblages of tubeworms, clams, mussels, bacterial mats, and a variety of associated organisms collectively known as chemosynthetic communities. These occur in many locations in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Manmade hazards include existing offshore installations, pipelines or cables, shipwrecks, and military dumping grounds. Additionally, maritime regulations must be observed at all times.
Mardi Gras was confronted with all of these when selecting the deepwater-pipeline routes. More than 330 miles (531 kilometers) of pipeline (not including the portion of Okeanos laid by Shell Pipeline Co. LP) was planned in water depths ranging from 400 ft (122 m) to 7,300 ft (2225 m).
The goal of the pipeline survey was to ensure that the pipelines followed the optimum routes on the basis of best survey data available. This included using the first commercial-use AUV system in conjunction with C&C Technologies Inc.
|File Size||899 KB||Number of Pages||4|
This paperhas no references.