Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments Deployed From an FPSO in a Deepwater, Subsea Field in the Campos Basin
- Philip J. Bogaert (Shell Nigeria E&P Co. Ltd.) | Marcos C. Berredo (Sarawak Shell Berhad) | Celso Toschi (Shell Brasil S.A.) | Myles M. Jordan (Nalco) | Dario M. Frigo (Shell Intl. E&P Inc.) | Lee N. Morgenthaler (Shell E&P Co.) | Macros Afonso (Nalco)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 451 - 471
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.1 Hydrates, 1.8 Formation Damage, 4.2.4 Risers, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.4.3 Fines Migration, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 5.6.5 Tracers, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 4.5.3 Floating Production Systems, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 1.3.2 Subsea Wellheads
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 710 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper describes field experience and lessons learned from scale control operations in a deepwater subsea development in the Campos Basin, Brazil; specifically, from bullheading scale-inhibitor squeezes from the FPSO host, along the production flowlines, into four low-watercut, horizontal subsea wells, completed with sand control.
The relatively small number of high-cost, highly productive wells, coupled with a very high barium-sulfate scaling tendency upon breakthrough of injection water, meant that not only was effective scale management critical to achieve high hydrocarbon recovery, but even wells at low water cuts were deemed to be at sufficient risk to require squeeze application.
Use of conventional, water based squeezes have been known to cause significant damage to productivity in low-watercut wells, including those showing a fines-migration tendency, as was the case here. Hence, on the basis of risk mitigation, supported by an extensive program of laboratory testing, it was decided that for the initial treatments, only the mainflush would be water based, with a mutual-solvent preflush and marine-diesel overflush.
Other key challenges associated with treating from the host included the remote location of the wells, the potential to form hydrates, the cleanliness of the lines along which the treatment would pass, the achievement of effective placement over a long producing interval, as well as the need to deploy the chemical package via a support vessel adjacent to the FPSO. All had to be managed because of the high cost and low availability of a deepwater rig that could deploy the treatments directly to the subsea wellheads.
This paper will explore in detail the issues associated with inhibitor-squeeze deployment in deepwater, subsea fields, many of which are currently being developed in the Campos basin, Gulf of Mexico, and West Africa, and are a good example of best-practice sharing from another oil basin.
Fields Description. The fields are located in the Campos Basin offshore Brazil, approximately 145 km east of Macae, on the present-day continental slope, in water depths ranging from 700 to 850 m. Development of Field X comprises six horizontal producers, gravel-packed with pre-packed screens, located centrally in the reservoir and four deviated water injectors at the flanks. The six production wells are located on two production manifolds and the four injection wells on a single injection manifold.
Field Y is 5 km to the northwest of Field X, and was developed in a similar manner, with two horizontal producers completed as in Field X, producing to one manifold, and two deviated water injectors tied back to another.
Both fields produce to the same FPSO, which has a production capacity of 81,000 BOPD and a storage capacity of 1.2 million barrels of oil. A third party operates the FPSO.
The field came on stream in August 2003. Initial average production was some 60 kbpd but this dropped to 50 kbpd by early 2005 because of early breakthrough of injection water and well impairment.
The reservoir temperature is approximately 90°C. Scale formation has been a production issue in these fields as they are supported by injection of seawater, which is incompatible with the formation brines that contain up to 180 mg/l barium and up to 300 mg/l strontium ions. Wells with seawater breakthrough are scale squeezed using a phosphate-ester scale inhibitor to control sulfate and carbonate scale formation within the wells and flowlines; additional inhibitor is injected to the produced fluids once they reach the topside facilities.
Table 1 shows the typical formation brine chemistry for both fields. Injection-quality seawater has been used to maintain reservoir pressure and improved fluid sweep within most of the reservoir units over the life of the field. Figs. 1 and 2 show the maximum predicted mass of sulfate scales associated with injection-water breakthrough under reservoir conditions as a function of the fraction of seawater in the produced water; Figs. 3 and 4 show the corresponding supersaturation values. There is no calcium sulfate tendency for any mixing ratio.
It is clear that barium sulfate is the most significant predicted scale type present in terms of both mass of scale and supersaturation. Observation of scale samples recovered from the field supports these predictions with barium sulfate being more prevalent than either strontium sulfate or calcium carbonate in the suspended particulates observed in produced water and in scale samples recovered from wells. Significant amounts of calcium carbonate particulates have only been observed from one well in Field Y.
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||21|
Emmons, D.H., Graham, G.C., Holt, S.P., Jordan, M.M. and Locardel, B. 1999.On-Site, Near-Real-Time Monitoringof Scale Deposition. Paper SPE 56776 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. DOI: 10.2118/56776-MS.
Feasey, N.D., Wintle, R.J., Frieter, E.R., and Jordan, M.M. 2000. FieldExperience With a Novel Near Real Time Monitor For Scale Deposition in OilfieldSystem. Paper presented at NACE 2000, Orlando, Florida, 27 March-1April.
Graham, G.M., Dyer, S.J., Shone, P., Mackay, E.J., and Juhász, A. 2001a. High Temperature Core FloodingExperiments for the Selection of Appropriate Scale Inhibitor Products forPotential Application as Downhole Squeeze Treatments in High-TemperatureReservoir Environments. Paper SPE 68314 presented at the SPE 3rdInternational Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 30-31 January. DOI:10.2118/68314-MS.
Graham, G.M., Dyer, S.J., Shone, P., Mackay, E.J., and Juhász, A. 2001b.Comparative Core Flooding and Field Application Implications for ScaleInhibitor Downhole Squeeze Treatments in High Temperature (374F) Reservoirs.Paper SPE 65008 presented at the SPE International Symposium on OilfieldChemistry, Houston, Texas, 13-16 February.
Graham, G.M., Mackay, E.J., Wattie, I. and Boak, L.S. 2001. Scale InhibitorSelection Criteria for Downhole (SQUEEZE) Application in a Chalk Reservoir.Paper SPE 65025 presented at the SPE International Symposium on OilfieldChemistry, Houston, Texas, 13-16 February.
Granstaff, V.E., Martin, S.J., US Patent No. 5201215, 1993.
Jordan, M.M., Archibald, I., Donaldson, L., Stevens, K. and Kemp, S. 2003.Deployment, Monitoring, andOptimisation of a Combined Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor Within a Subsea Facilityin the North Sea Basin. Paper SPE 80214 presented at SPE InternationalSymposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 5-7 February. DOI:10.2118/80214-MS.
Jordan, M.M, Johnston, C.J., and Robb, M. 2005. Evaluation Methods for SuspendedSolids and Produced Water as an Aid in Determining Effectiveness of ScaleControl Both Downhole and Topside. Paper SPE 92663 presented at the SPEInternational Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 2-4 February. DOI:10.2118/92663-MS.
Jordan, M.M, Mackin, K., Johnston, C.J. and Feasey, N.D. 2004. Control of Hydrogen SulphideScavenger Induced Scale and the Associated Challenge of Sulphide ScaleFormation Within North Sea High Temperature/High Salinity Fields ProductionWells: Laboratory Evaluation to Field Application. Laboratory Evaluation toField Application. Paper SPE 87433 presented at SPE International Symposium onOilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 26-27 May. DOI: 10.2118/87433-MS.
Jordan, M.M, Sorbie, K.S, Graham, G.M., Taylor, K., and Hennessey, S. 1996.The Correct Selection andApplication Methods for Adsorption and Precipitation Scale Inhibitors forSqueeze Treatments in North Sea Oil Fields. Paper SPE 31125 presented atSPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, 14-15 February.DOI: 10.2118/31125-MS.
Kraus, P.R, McClain, R.D., Poindexter, M.K. 1998. US Patent No. 5734098,1998.
Mackay, E.J. 2002. Modelling ofIn-Situ Scale Deposition: The Impact of Reservoir and Well Geometries andKinetic Reaction Rates. Paper SPE 74683 presented at the SPE 4thInternational Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 30-31 January. DOI10.2118/74683-MS.
Mackay, E.J. 2001a. SQUEEZEModelling: Current Best Practice and New Capabilities. Paper SPE 68326presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, 30-31January. DOI: 10.2118/68326-MS.
Mackay, E.J and Jordan, M.M. 2003. SQUEEZE Modelling: Treatment Designand Case Histories. Paper SPE 82227 presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, The Hague, 13-14 May. DOI: 10.2118/82227-MS.
Martin, S.J., Granstaff, V.E., and Frye, G.C. 1991. Martin, S.J., Granstaff,V.E., and Frye, G.C. 1991. Characterization of a Quartz Crystal Microbalancewith Simultaneous Mass and Liquid Loading. Analytical Chemistry63: 2272-2281.
Paulo, J., Mackay, E.J., Menzies, N.A., and Poynton, N. 2001. Implications of Brine Mixing in theReservoir for Scale Management in the Alba Field. Paper SPE 68310 presentedat the SPE 3rd International Symposium on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, Scotland,30-31 January. DOI: 10.2118/68310-MS.
Paulo, J., Mackay, E.J., Menzies, N.A. and Poynton, N.2001. Brine MixingComplicates Alba Field Scale Management. Oil & Gas Journal, August27: 79-91.
Sorbie , K.S., Graham, G.M., and Jordan, M.M. 2000. How Scale InhibitorsWork and How This Affects Test Methodology. Proc., Fourth InternationalConference and Exhibition—Chemistry in Industry, Bahrain, 30 October-1November.
Tiersten, H. 1969. Linear Piezoelectric Plate Vibrations. New York:Plenum.