Operational Control of Hydrocyclones During Variable Produced Water Flow Rates—Frøy Case Study
- Trygve Husveg (U. of Stavanger) | Oddgeir Johansen (Total E&P Norge) | Torleiv Bilstad (U. of Stavanger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 294 - 300
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3.2.6 Produced Water Management, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 671 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
International regulations of produced water discharges to sea are enforced, thereby enhancing focus on optimizing produced water treatment. De-oiling hydrocyclones are prioritized technology for produced water treatment on offshore oil-producing platforms. Oil/water separation happens within a few seconds in hydrocyclones and preciseness in operational control is essential. Surging flow may cause severe problems to hydrocyclones. A case study at TOTAL E&P NORGE AS's Frøy field demonstrated how the implementation of a holistic process control structure effectively optimized hydrocyclone performance by reducing oil in produced water by 50%. This paper emphasizes how operational interaction between separators and hydrocyclones, alternative routing of hydrocyclone oil streams, capable control systems, and establishing hydrocyclone performance indicators are all elements in optimization programs for de-oiling hydrocyclones.
Produced water is water coproduced with oil and gas from hydrocarbon reservoirs. Water production is normally low from new fields. As a field matures, however, more water is produced because of changed reservoir conditions and water being injected into reservoirs for pressure support. Well streams containing 90% water or more are not uncommon from older fields.
As international regulations for disposal of hydrocarbons at sea are enforced, focus on methods and technologies for produced water treatment are intensified. On older installations, produced water treatment might be by means of large-volume plate separators and gas flotation units. On newer installations, and when replacing equipment on older platforms, de-oiling hydrocyclones followed by smaller degassing units are normally installed. Hydrocyclone technology has in the last 20 years emerged as the preferred solution for produced water treatment (Thew 2000). Almost 90% of offshore produced water treatment facilities are based on hydrocyclone technology (Georgie 2002). Hydrocyclones have superior qualitative performance as well as volumetric capacity, easy and reliable operation, low maintenance, and low utility requirements compared to traditional gravity separators (Choi 1999; Stroder and Wolfenberger 1994). Increased capacity and ability to add on capacity make hydrocyclone arrangements favorable when produced water production multiplies in aging fields.
|File Size||721 KB||Number of Pages||7|
Bansal, K.M. and Caudle, D.D. 1998. Interferences With Produced WaterTreatment for Dispersed Oil Removal. Paper SPE 46576 presented at the SPEInternational Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and GasExploration and Production, Caracas, 7-10 June. DOI: 10.2118/46576-MS.
Belaidi, A. and Thew, M.T. 2003. The Effect of Oil and Gas Content on theControllability and Separation in a De-oiling Hydrocyclone. Trans IChemE81: 305-314.
Bradley, D. 1965. The Hydrocyclone. New York: Pergamon Press.9-13
Chine, B. and Concha, F. 2000. Flow Patterns in Conical and CylindricalHydrocyclones. Chemical Engineering Journal 80: 267-273.
Choi, M.S. 1990. HydrocycloneProduced Water Treatment for Offshore Developments. Paper SPE 20662presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,23-26 September. DOI: 10.2118/20662-MS.
Colman, D.A. and Thew, M.T. 1980. Hydrocyclone to Give a Highly ConcentratedSample of a Lighter Dispersed Phase. Proc., International Conference onHydrocyclones. Cambridge, U.K.: BHRA.
Colman, D.A., Thew, M.T., and Corney, D.R. 1980. Hydrocyclones for Oil/WaterSeparation. Proc., International Conference on Hydrocyclones. Cambridge,U.K.: BHRA.
Ditria, J.C. and Hoyack, M.E. 1994. The Separation of Solids and LiquidsWith Hydrocyclone-Based Technology for Water Treatment and CrudeProcessing. Paper SPE 28815 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and GasConference, Melbourne, 7-10 November. DOI: 10.2118/28815-MS.
Flanigan, D.A., Stolhand, J.E., and Shimoda, E. 1992. Use of Low-Shear Pumps andHydrocyclones for Improved Performance in the Cleanup of Low-PressureWater. SPEPE 7 (3): 295-300. SPE-19743-PA. DOI:10.2118/19743-PA.
Georgie, W.J. 2002. Effective and Holistic Approach to Produced WaterManagement for Offshore Operation. Paper OTC 14286 presented at the 2002Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 6-9 May.
Gomez, C. et al. 2001. Oil-Water Separation in Liquid-LiquidHydrocyclones (LLHC)—Experiment and Modeling. Paper SPE 71538 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3October. DOI: 10.2118/71538-MS.
Hashmi, K.A., Hamza, H.A., and Wilson, J.C. 2004. CANMET Hydrocyclone: AnEmerging Alternative for the Treatment of Oily Waste Streams. MineralsEngineering 17: 643-649.
Jiang, M., Zhao, L., and He, J. 1998. Pressure Drop Ratio—An ImportantPerformance Parameter in Liquid-Liquid Hydrocyclone Separation. Proc.,Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Montreal,Canada: 335.
Khatib, Z.I. 1998. Handling,Treatment and Disposal of Produced Water in the Offshore Oil Industry.Paper SPE 48992 prepared for presentation at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30 September. DOI:10.2118/48992-MS.
Meldrum, N. 1988. Hydrocyclones: A Solution toProduced-Water Treatment. SPEPE 3 (4): 669-676.SPE-16642-PA. DOI: 10.2118/16642-PA.
Sinker, A.B., Humphris, M., and Wayth, N. 1999. Enhanced Deoiling HydrocyclonePerformance Without Resorting to Chemicals. Paper SPE 56969 presented atthe SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Exhibition and Conference, Aberdeen, 7-10September. DOI: 10.2118/56969-MS.
Smyth, I.C., Thew, M.T., and Colman, D.A. 1984. The Effect of Split Ratio onHeavy Dispersion Liquid-Liquid Separation in Hydrocyclones. Proc., 2ndInternational Conference on Hydrocyclones. Bath, U.K.: BHRA.
Stroder, S.M. and Wolfenberger, E.E. 1994. Hydrocyclone Separation: A PreferredMeans of Water Separation and Handling in Oilfield Production. Paper SPE27671 presented at the SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference,Midland, Texas, 16-18 March. DOI: 10.2118/27671-MS.
Thew, M.T. 2000. Cyclones for Oil/Water Separations. Encyclopedia ofSeparation Science. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 1480.
Young, G.A.B. et al. 1994. Oil-Water Separation Using Hydrocyclones: AnExperimental Search for Optimum Dimensions. Journal of Petroleum Science andEngineering 11 (1): 37-50.