Field Case Studies: Damage Preventions Through Leakoff Control of Fracturing Fluids in Marginal/Low-Pressure Gas Reservoirs
- Javad Paktinat (Universal Well Services Inc.) | Joseph A. Pinkhouse (Universal Well Services Inc.) | Curtis Williams (Universal Well Services Inc.) | Gary A. Clark (Phillips Production) | Glenn S. Penny (CESI Chemical)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 357 - 367
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.8 Formation Damage, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 2 Well Completion, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2.2.2 Perforating, 2.4.6 Frac and Pack, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 1.8.5 Phase Trapping, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2.5.1 Fracture design and containment
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 705 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
The primary purpose of surfactants used in stimulating sandstone reservoirs is to reduce surface tension and contact angle and provide leakoff control. However, many of these chemicals adsorb rapidly within the first few inches of the sandstone formations, reducing their effectiveness in deeper penetration. This phenomenon causes surfactants to adsorb or plate-out, reducing their effectiveness in post-fracturing fluid recovery.
This study describes experimental and field-case studies of various surfactants used in the oilfield. Several different surfactants, including a nonionic ethoxylated linear alcohol, a nonyl phenol ethoxylate, an amphoteric, a cationic, and a microemulsion system were investigated to determine their adsorption properties when injected into a laboratory sandpacked column. A laboratory-simulated comparison study of commonly used surfactants and microemulsion was used to identify their leakoff and water-recovery properties from gas wells.
Field data collected from Bradford, Balltown, and Speechley sandstone formations confirmed experimental sandpacked column and core-flow investigations. Reservoirs treated with microemulsion fluids demonstrate exceptional water recoveries when compared with conventional surfactant treatments. Wellhead pressures, flowing pressures, and production data were collected and evaluated using a production simulator to show effective fracture lengths, damage surrounding the fractures, and drainage areas with various fluid systems. These investigations and presented case studies can be used to minimize formation damage.
Surfactants or surface-active agents are predominantly used in hydraulic fracturing fluids to reduce emulsion tendencies between reservoir oil and treatment fluids. This problem is normally addressed by incorporating a nonemulsifier within fracturing fluids. However, when gas wells are stimulated with water-based fracturing fluids, fluid retention and a reduction in interfacial tension between the rock and the injected fluid are the key driving forces worthy of consideration for well cleanup. One of the continuing challenges in Appalachian Basin gas wells is post-fracturing fluid recovery caused by low-pressure reservoirs. This could be caused by the water-based fluid, creating fluid retention, interfacial tension between the injected fluid and the reservoir rock, or capillary end effect on and around the vicinity of the face of the fractured rock (Penny and Pursley 2005). To reduce these problems, commonly available surfactants are incorporated within the fracturing fluid to reduce surface tension. However, surfactants alone do not provide adequate water recovery properties for the reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin. Low temperature, pressure, and permeability of these reservoirs may be some of the major reasons that less than 50% of the treatment fluids can be recovered from gas wells through conventional methods (Penny and Pursley 2005). As illustrated in Fig. 1, it is possible that large quantities of injected fracturing fluids could be trapped in the area near the fractured proppant pack.
When this condition occurs, higher water saturation adversely impacts the relative permeability, resulting in gas being trapped and thus significantly impairing gas production into the fractured face and ultimately into the wellbore. This condition along with capillary end effects eventually leads to longer swabbing times, well cleanups, and poor well productivity.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Bannion, D.B. et al. 1995. Water and Hydrocarbon Phase Trapping in PorousMedia: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. Paper CIM 95-69 presented at thePetroleum Society Annual Technical Meeting, Banff, Canada, May.
Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego-V., F. 1981. Transient Pressure Analysis: FiniteConductivity Fracture Case Versus Damaged Fracture Case. Paper SPE 10179presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, 5-7 October. DOI: 10.2118/10179-MS.
Crafton, J.W. 1996. The Reciprocal Productivity Index Method, a GraphicalSimulator. Paper presented at the Southwest Petroleum Shortcourse, Lubbock,Texas, 17-18 April.
Labenski, F., Reid, P., and Santos, H. 2003. Drilling Fluid Approaches for Controlof Wellbore Instability in Fractured Formations. Paper SPE/IADC 85304presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference andExhibition, Abu Dhabi, 20-22 October. DOI: 10.2118/85304-MS.
Paktinat, J. 1991. ReducedAdsorption and Emulsion Tendencies in Sandstone Formation Through the Use ofEthoxylates. Paper SPE 21011 presented at the SPE International Symposiumon Oilfield Chemistry, Anaheim, California, 20-22 February. DOI:10.2118/21011-MS.
Paktinat, J., Pinkhouse, J., Williams, C., and Penny, G.S. 2005. Microemulsion Reduces Adsorption andEmulsion Tendencies in Bradford and Speechley Sandstone Formations. PaperSPE 93270 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,The Woodlands, Texas, 2-4 February. DOI: 10.2118/93270-MS.
Penny, G.S. and Pursley, J.T. 2005. The Application of MicroemulsionAdditives in Drilling and Stimulation Results in Enhanced Gas Production.Paper SPE 94274 presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, OklahomaCity, 16-19 April. DOI: 10.2118/94274-MS.
Penny, G.S. and Conway, M.W. 1990. An Evaluation of the Effects ofEnvironmental Conditions and Fracturing Fluids Upon the Long-Term Conductivityof Proppants. STIM-LAB Proppant Consortium Report.
Pursley, J.T., Penny, G.S., and Holcomb, D. 2004. Microemulsion Additives EnableOptimized Formation Damage Repair and Prevention. Paper SPE 86556 presentedat the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control,Lafayette, Louisiana, 18-20 February. DOI: 10.2118/86556-MS.
Rosen, M.J. and Dahanayake, M. 2000. Industrial Utilization ofSurfactants Principles and Practice. First edition. 16-67. Champaign,Illinois: AOCS Press.
Schecter, R. 1991. Oil Well Stimulation. New York: Prentice Hall.
Talmon, Y. and Prager, S. 1980. Dynamic and Static Voronoi Models. Paperpresented at the Fifth International Conference on Small Angle Scattering, WestBerlin, October.
Wells, J.D. and Amaefule, J.O. 1985. Capillary Pressure and PermeabilityRelationships in Tight Gas Sands. Paper SPE 13879 presented at the 1985SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 19-22 March. DOI:10.2118/13879-MS.