Collapse Analysis of Perforated Pipes Under External Pressure
- Chris Carpenter (JPT Technology Editor)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- June 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 77 - 79
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 64 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||Free|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 17.00|
This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 184946, “Collapse Analysis of Perforated Pipes Under External Pressure,” by K. Beltrán and T. Netto, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, prepared for the 2017 SPE Latin American and Caribbean Mature Fields Symposium, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 15–16 March. The paper has not been peer reviewed.
This work is a study of collapse pressure of perforated pipes to evaluate the effect of lateral perforations on the radial resistance of pipes under external pressure. These types of pipes represent a simple and economical technology widely used as sand-control meshes or perforated liners.
One of the most common challenges to high flow rates in mature fields is the migration of sand to the well. High rates of oil production together with maximum sand retention is the optimal result. In accomplishing this complex goal, perforated pipes play a vital role because they are a simple and inexpensive application, and they are widely used in the industry. Failures of such pipes are directly related to the collapse resistance of a pipe weakened by the perforations. Such failures can occur because of the plugging of holes or changes in differential pressure. This study might contribute to future prediction of collapse pressures of perforated pipes without resorting to costly full-scale experiments.
Geometric Properties. This study involves four intact and eight perforated specimens as study bodies. All of them were obtained from four pipes designated as T3, T4, T5, and T6. A special nomenclature was defined to identify each one with a sequence of letters and numbers. An explanation of this nomenclature is shown in Fig. 1.
The geometrical properties were obtained by means of a physical mapping, taking 10 measurements in the longitudinal direction and five in the circumferential direction to calculate the average thickness, average diameter, and initial imperfections (ovalization and eccentricity) of each specimen.
Material Properties. The mechanical properties were also determined for each specimen by means of traction tests on 18 proof bodies, including some in the longitudinal direction and others in the circumferential direction. After processing the results, the average curves and values for the mechanical properties for each tube were defined. Because of the remarkable differences in shape and behavior of the curves, an average curve was calculated also. The results of monotonic traction tests in the circumferential direction are shown in Table 4 of the complete paper, and the plots are shown in Figs. 3 and 4 of the complete paper.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||3|