•This article argues for the development of minimum requirements to accredit academic programs in the OSH field.
•As a sovereign profession, OSH should have professional boundaries characterized by a standardized set of educational outcomes that represent the knowledge, skills or abilities/behaviors required by practitioners.
•Without a commonly accepted set of educational outcomes, the discipline is at risk of dilution.
•This article focuses on why program-level accreditation is critical to securing a specific body of knowledge and the ongoing maturation of the OSH profession.The OSH profession is wonderfully dynamic and complex. It consists of a mix of line and staff positions; incorporates practitioners from a wide variety of backgrounds; has dozens of professional credentials (e.g., CSP, CIH, OHST, ARM, CPE); is compliant to reams of state and federal mandates; exists in hundreds of industries; and involves a range of disparate work sites from nanotechnology and manufacturing to healthcare, construction and energy generation.
|File Size||453 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Looking for more?
Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.
|PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
|The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.