Workflow Development and Sensitivity Investigation of Offset Well-to-Well Interference Through 3-D Fracture Modeling and Reservoir Simulation in the Denver-Julesburg Basin
- Taylor Levon (Fracture ID) | Jennifer Miskimins (Colorado School of Mines)
- Document ID
- Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
- SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 22-24 July, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 79 since 2007
- Show more detail
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Well-to-well interference is an increasingly discussed issue. Previously drilled and producing “parent” wells and recently drilled “child” wells are yielding a reduction in recovery rates in both short and long-term cases due to interference. A primary contributor to the variability in production is the presence of pressure sinks as the result of production depletion in the parent wells. Infill drilling will continue to occur in the development of unconventional plays, and it is crucial to gain an understanding of the impacts of well-to-well interference on hydraulic fracture generation.
This paper discusses a detailed approach to investigating well-to-well interference based on integrating hydraulic fracture modeling and reservoir simulation in two different formations, the Niobrara and Codell, in the Denver-Julesburg Basin. The geomechanical properties were calibrated by DFIT data and pressure matching of the parent well treatments. The resulting parent well fracture geometries were incorporated into a numerical reservoir model to determine the pressure depletion envelopes. The imported depletion model allows for the simulation of the child well treatments and associated impacts of the pressure sinks on fracture generation and the interaction between child and parent wells. The resulting depletion model provided a framework to investigate various methods to mitigate the effects of well-to-well communication in subsequent development. The developed workflow of well-to-well interference is applicable in understanding the effects of infill development in other producing basins.
The modeled child well treatments resulted in a clear indication of well-to-well communication with the parent wells that was attributable to pressure depletion. Actual field bottom-hole pressure measurements validated these results in the parent wells captured during the time of the child well treatments. Resulting proppant concentrations of the child well fractures indicated that the majority of the proppant transports towards the parent wells. Very little effective conductivity exists in the opposing direction of the depleted regions.
Slickwater treatment simulations indicate extremely asymmetric fractures that stay isolated to their respective target bench. For child wells in the same bench as the parent wells, fractures propagate directly toward the parent wells, with little to no fracture growth in the opposite direction.
Protection frac simulations indicate beneficial or detrimental results depending on the amount of repressurization that is achieved and the distance that the pressure transient extends into the reservoir. Re-pressurizing the reservoir surrounding the parent wells by 1,000 psi resulted in a reduction of well interference. A 500-psi scenario resulted in increased well interference between the parent wells. Several wells communicated with both parent wells due to the repressurization being insufficient to offset the depletion.
Natural repressurization of the reservoir to mitigate the effect of well interference was also investigated by using the reservoir model. Simulation of the parent wells being shut-in for three months prior to the child well treatments resulted in a pore pressure increase of only 280 psi. Based on the protection frac sensitivity of 500 psi, this is not a large enough repressurization to mitigate well-to-well interference successfully in the modeled scenarios.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|