Investigating Factors that May Impact the Success of Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale Reservoirs
- Sherif Fakher (Missouri University of Science and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 37 in the last 30 days
- 142 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 1.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 2.00|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection has recently been applied as an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method to increase oil recovery from unconventional shale reservoirs. Many interactions will impact the success or failure of this EOR method. This research experimentally investigates the impact of two of these interactions, including asphaltene pore plugging and CO2 adsorption, on the success of CO2 EOR in unconventional shale reservoirs. Two sets of experiments were designed to study the asphaltene pore plugging and CO2 adsorption. The impact of varying CO2 injection pressure, temperature, oil viscosity, and filter membrane pore size on asphaltene pore plugging was investigated. Pertaining to the adsorption experiments, the impact of varying CO2 injection pressure, temperature, and shale particle size was investigated. Asphaltene pore plugging was found to be extremely severe especially in the smaller pore sizes, which indicates that asphaltene poses a serious problem when producing from unconventional nanopores. As the oil viscosity decreased, the asphaltene concentration in the oil decreased as well which made the asphaltene pore plugging less severe in the lower viscosity oils. The thermodynamic conditions, including pressure and temperature, also had a strong impact on asphaltene stability and pore plugging. When undergoing the CO2 adsorption experiments, it was found that increasing the CO2 injection pressure resulted in an increase in adsorption capacity to a certain limit beyond which no further adsorption will be possible. Increasing the temperature resulted in the CO2 molecules becoming highly active which in turn resulted in a decrease in the adsorption capacity significantly. Since experiments were conducted using shale particles, as opposed to an actual shale core, it was important to investigate the accuracy of the results by varying the shale particle size. It was found that as long as the void space volume was measured accurately using helium, the shale particle size had a negligible effect on the adsorption values. This research systematically investigates the impact of two significant interactions on the success of CO2 injection in unconventional shale reservoirs, and studies the impact of several factors within these interactions to determine the extent to which they may influence the success of this EOR method.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Bahadori, A., and Vuthaluru, H., 2010. Rapid Prediction of Carbon Dioxide Adsorption Isotherms for Molecular Sieves Using Simple Correlation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/122882-PA.
Clarkson, C. R., 2003. Application of a New Multicomponent Gas Adsorption Model to Coal Gas Adsorption Systems. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/78146-PA.
Eliebid, M.et al., 2017. Adsorption Role in Shale Gas Recovery and the Feasibility of CO2 in Shale Enhanced Gas Recovery: A Study on Shale Gas from Saudi Arabia. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/187667-MS.
Fakher, S. and Imqam, A., 2018a. Asphaltene Precipitation and Deposition during CO2 Injection in Nano Shale Pore Structure and Its Impact on Oil Recovery. Fuel Journal. El-Sevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.039.
Fakher, S. and Imqam, A., 2018b. Investigating and Mitigating Asphaltene Precipitation and Deposition in Low Permeability Oil Reservoirs during Carbon Dioxide Flooding to Increase Oil Recovery, Presented at the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition, Astana, Kazakhstan. https://doi.org/10.2118/192558-MS.
Fakher, S.et al., 2018. Investigating the Viscosity Reduction of Ultra-Heavy Crude Oil Using Hydrocarbon Soluble Low Molecular Weight Compounds to Improve Oil Production and Transportation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/193677-MS.
Lafortune, S.et al., 2014. Assessing CO2 Adsorption Capacities onto Shales through Gravimetric Experiments: A First Step in the Feasibility Study of Coupling "Fracking" with Carbon Storage, Energy Procedia, 63, 5933–5937, 1876-6102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.629.
Le, T. D.et al., 2017. A New Matrix/Fracture Multiscale Coupled Model for Flow in Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/181750-PA.
Li L.et al. 2017. Effect of the Injection Pressure on Enhancing Oil Recovery in Shale Cores during the CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process when it is above and below Minimum Miscibility Pressure. Energy & Fuels Journal 31, 3856–3867. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00031.
Lu, M.,et al., 2017. A New Method for the Estimation of Lost Gas During the Measurement of the Gas Content of Coal. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/176976-PA.
Mohammad, S.et al., 2009. Experimental Uncertainties in Volumetric Methods for Measuring Equilibrium Adsorption. Energy & Fuels, 23, 2810–2820., https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8011257.
Psarras, P.et al., 2017. Methane and CO2 Adsorption Capacities of Kerogen in the Eagle Ford Shale from Molecular Simulation. Accounts of Chemical Research, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00003.
Shen and Sheng, 2018, Experimental and numerical study of permeability reduction caused by asphaltene precipitation and deposition during CO2 huff and puff injection in Eagle Ford shale, Fuel, 211, 432–445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.047.
Soroush, S.et al., 2014. A Comparison of Asphaltene Deposition in Miscible and Immiscible Carbon Dioxide Flooding in Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/169657-MS.
Yu, W.et al., 2016. Modeling Gas Adsorption in Marcellus Shale With Langmuir and BET Isotherms. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/170801-PA.