Comparison of Various Particle Size Distribution Measurement Methods: Role of Particle Shape Descriptors
- Morteza Roostaei (RGL Reservoir Management Inc.) | Mohammad Soroush (RGL Reservoir Management Inc., University of Alberta) | Seyed Abolhassan Hosseini (RGL Reservoir Management Inc., University of Alberta) | Arian Velayati (University of Alberta) | Ahmad Alkouh (College of Technical Studies) | Mahdi Mahmoudi (RGL Reservoir Management Inc.) | Ali Ghalambor (Oil Center Research International) | Vahidoddin Fattahpour (RGL Reservoir Management Inc.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 19-21 February, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 2.4 Sand Control, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 2 Well completion
- Particle Size Distribution, Dynamic Image Analysis, Sedimentation, Sieving, Laser Diffraction
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 73 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Sieve analysis, sedimentation and laser diffraction have been the methods of choice in determining particle size distribution (PSD) for sand control design. However, these methods do not provide any information regarding the particle shape. In this study, we introduce the application of Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA) to characterize particle sizes and shape descriptors of sand bearing formations.
Dynamic Image Analysis, an advanced method of particle size and shape characterization, along with other PSD measurement methods, including sieving combined with sedimentation, and laser diffraction, was utilized to study size and shape variations of 372 unconsolidated formation sand samples from North America, Latin America, and the Middle East. Different methods were compared for the estimation of PSD and fines content, which is important for sand control design.
Through minimizing the sampling and measurement errors, the deviation between different PSD measurement techniques was attributed solely to the shape of the particles and the amount of fine fraction. For fines content measurement, the values obtained through Feret Min. parameter values (the minimum size of a particle along all directions) calculated by DIA and sieving measurement are comparable within a 5% confidence band. The deviation between the results of different methods becomes more significant by increasing fines content. Moreover, this deviation increases for less isodiametric grains. The fines and clay content show higher values when measured by any wet analysis. Laser diffraction also tends to overestimate the fines fraction and underestimate silt/sand fraction compared to other dry techniques. By comparing the deviation of the DIA and sieving at standard mesh sizes, an algorithm has been developed which chooses the equivalent sphere sizes of DIA with minimum deviation from sieving.
This study performs several measurements on formation sands to illustrate the real advantage of the new methods over traditional measurement techniques. Furthermore, particle shape descriptors were used to explain the deviation between the results of different PSD measurement methods.
|File Size||16 MB||Number of Pages||32|
Alderliesten, M. 1990. Mean Particle Diameters. Part I: Evaluation of Definition Systems. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 7 (1-4): 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19900070138.
Allegra, J. R. and Hawley, S. A. 1972. Attenuation of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions: Theory and Experiments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51 (5): 1545-1564. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912999.
Beuselinck, L., Govers, G., Poesen, J. 1998. Grain-Size Analysis by Laser Diffractometry: Comparison with the Sieve-Pipette Method. CATENA 32 (3-4): 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(98)00051-4.
Buurman, P., Pape, T., Reijneveld, J. A. 2001. Laser-Diffraction and Pipette-Method Grain Sizing of Dutch Sediments: Correlations for Fine Fractions of Marine, Fluvial, and Loess Samples. Netherlands J. Geosci. - Geol. En Mijnb. 80 (2): 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600022319.
Callaghan, P., Jolley, K., and Humphrey, R. 1983. Diffusion of Fat and Water in Cheese as Studied by Pulsed Field Gradient Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93 (2): 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(83)90436-8.
Campbell, G. S. and Shiozawa, S. 1992. Prediction of Hydraulic Properties of Soils Using Particle-Size Distribution and Bulk Density Data. Proc., The International Workshop on Indirect Methods for Estimating Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils, 317 - 328. University of California Riverside, CA.
Clark, M. W. 1981. Quantitative Shape Analysis: A Review. J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 13 (4): 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01031516.
De Boer, G. B. J., De Weerd, C., Thoenes, D. 1987. Laser Diffraction Spectrometry: Fraunhofer Diffraction Versus Mie Scattering. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 4 (1-4): 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19870040104.
Di Stefano, C., Ferro, V., and Mirabile, S. 2010. Comparison between Grain-Size Analyses Using Laser Diffraction and Sedimentation Methods. Biosyst. Eng. 106 (2): 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.03.013.
Eshel, G., Levy, G. J., Mingelgrin, U. 2004. Critical Evaluation of the Use of Laser Diffraction for Particle-Size Distribution Analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68 (3): 736-743. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.7360.
Nakamura, K., Kawabata, T., and Mori, Y. 2003. Size Distribution Analysis of Colloidal Gold by Small Angle X-Ray Scattering and Light Absorbance. Powder Technol. 131 (2-3): 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(02)00340-6.
O'Brien, R. W., Cannon, D. W., and Rowlands, W. N. 1995. Electroacoustic Determination of Particle Size and Zeta Potential. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 173 (2): 406-418. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1995.1341.
Packer, K. and Rees, C. 1972. Pulsed NMR Studies of Restricted Diffusion. I. Droplet Size Distributions in Emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40 (2): 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(72)90010-0.
Pieri, L., Bittelli, M., and Pisa, P. R. 2006. Laser Diffraction, Transmission Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis to Evaluate a Bimodal Gaussian Model for Particle Size Distribution in Soils. Geoderma 135: 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.11.009.
Pons, M., Vivier, H., Belaroui, K. 1999. Particle Morphology: From Visualisation to Measurement. Powder Technol. 103 (1): 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00023-6.
Ruf, A., Worlitschek, J., and Mazzotti, M. 2000. Modeling and Experimental Analysis of PSD Measurements through FBRM. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 17 (4): 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4117(200012)17:4<167::AID-PPSC167>3.0.CO;2-T.
Singer, J. K., Anderson, J. B., Ledbetter, M. T. 1988. An Assessment of Analytical Techniques For The Size Analysis of Fine-Grained Sediments. J. Sediment. Res. 58 (3): 534-543. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F8DE6-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
Sympatec. 2019. Particle Sizing Instruments, https://www.sympatec.com/en/particle-measurement (accessed 23 October 2019).
Van Duynhoven, J. P. M., Goudappel, G. J. W., Van Dalen, G. 2002. Scope of Droplet Size Measurements in Food Emulsions by Pulsed Field Gradient NMR at Low Field. Magn. Reson. Chem. 40 (13): S51-S59. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1115.
Waddell, H. 1932. Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Rock Particles. J. Geol. 40 (5): 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1086/623964.
Wadell, H. 1933. Sphericity and Roundness of Rock Particles. J. Geol. 41 (3): 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1086/624040.
Worlitschek, J. and Mazzotti, M. 2003. Choice of the Focal Point Position Using Lasentec FBRM. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 20 (1): 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.200390000.
Finsy, R. 1994. Particle Sizing by Quasi-Elastic Light Scattering. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 52: 79-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8686(94)80041-3.
Goossens, D. 2008. Techniques to Measure Grain-Size Distributions of Loamy Sediments: A Comparative Study of Ten Instruments for Wet Analysis. Sedimentology 55 (1): 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00893.x.
Goudappel, G. J. W., Van Duynhoven, J. P. M., and Mooren, M. M. W. 2001. Measurement of Oil Droplet Size Distributions in Food Oil/Water Emulsions by Time Domain Pulsed Field Gradient NMR. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 239 (2): 535-542. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7603.
Hartman, A. W. 1985. Investigations in Array Sizing 2. The Kubitschek Effect. Powder Technol. 42 (3): 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(85)80063-2.
Hentschel, M. L. and Page, N. W. 2003. Selection of Descriptors for Particle Shape Characterization. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 20 (1): 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.200390002.
Hunter, R. J. 1998. Recent Developments in the Electroacoustic Characterisation of Colloidal Suspensions and Emulsions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 141 (1): 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00202-7.
Kaye, B. H. 1984. Multifractal Description of a Rugged Fineparticle Profile. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 1 (1-4): 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19840010103.
Konert, M. and Vandenberghe, J. E. 1997. Comparison of Laser Grain Size Analysis with Pipette and Sieve Analysis: A Solution for the Underestimation of the Clay Fraction. Sedimentology 44 (3): 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.1997.d01-38.x.
Liu, T. K., Odell, R. T., Etter, W. C. 1966. A Comparison of Clay Contents Determined by Hydrometer and Pipette Methods Using Reduced Major Axis Analysis1. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 30 (6): 665-669. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000060008x.
Loizeau, J. L., Arbouille, D., Santiago, S. 1994. Evaluation of a Wide Range Laser Diffraction Grain Size Analyser for Use with Sediments. Sedimentology 41 (2): 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1994.tb01410.x.
Martelli, S. and di Nunzio, P. E. 2002. Particle Size Distribution of Nanospheres by Monte Carlo Fitting of Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Curves. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 19 (4): 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4117 (200208)19:4<247::AID-PPSC247>3.0.CO;2-8.