Production Optimisation Under Uncertainty with Automated Scenario Reduction: A Real-Field Case Application
- E. Barros (TNO) | R. M. Fonseca (TNO) | R. J. de Moraes (Petrobras)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, 17-19 September, Abu Dhabi, UAE
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- optimal reservoir management, real-field case, life-cycle optimization under uncertainty, automated scenario reduction, ensemble-based method
- 46 in the last 30 days
- 46 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
In this work we discuss the successful application of our previously developed automated scenario reduction approach applied to life-cycle optimization of a real field case. The inherent uncertainty present in the description of reservoir properties motivates the use of an ensemble of model scenarios to achieve an optimized robust reservoir development strategy. In order to accurately span the range of uncertainties it is imperative to build a relatively large ensemble of model scenarios. The size of the ensemble is directly proportional to the computational effort required in robust optimization. For high-dimensional, complex field case models this implies that a large ensemble of model scenarios which albeit accurately captures the inherent uncertainties would be computationally infeasible to be utilized for robust optimization. One of the ways to circumvent this problem is to work with a reduced subset of model scenarios. Methods based on heuristics and ad-hoc rules exist to select this reduced subset. However, in most of the cases, the optimal number of model realizations must be known upfront. Excessively small number of realizations may result in a subset that does not always capture the span of uncertainties present, leading to sub-optimal optimization results. This raises the question on how to effectively select a subset that contains an optimal number of realizations which both is able to capture the uncertainties present and allow for a computationally efficient robust optimization. To answer this question we have developed an automated framework to select the reduced ensemble which has been applied to an original ensemble of 300 equiprobable model scenarios of a real field case. The methodology relies on the fact that, ideally, the distance between the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the objective function (OF) of the full and reduced ensembles should be minimal. This allows the method to determine the smallest subset of realizations that both spans the range of uncertainties and provides an OF CDF that is representative of the full ensemble based on a statistical metric. In this real field case application we optimize the injection rates throughout the assets life-cycle with expected cumulative oil production as the OF. The newly developed framework selected a small subset of 17 model scenarios out of the original ensemble which was used for robust optimization. The optimal injection strategy achieved an average increase of 6% in cumulative oil production with a significant reduction, approximately 90%, in the computational effort. Validation of this optimal strategy over the original ensemble lead to very similar improvements in cumulative oil production, highlighting the reliability and accuracy of our framework.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Barros, E. G. D., Yap, F. K., Insuasty, E., Van den Hof, P. M. J., and Jansen, J. D. (2016). Clustering techniques for value-of-information assessment in closed-loop reservoir management. In ECMOR XV-15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29 August - 1 September 2016.
Chen, Y., Oliver, D. S., and Zhang, D.. (2009). Efficient ensemble-based closed-coop production optimization. SPEJ, 14(04):634–645. SPE-112873-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112873-PA.
Fonseca, R. M., Chen, B., Jansen, J. D., and Reynolds, A. C. (2017). A stochastic simplex approximate gradient (StoSAG) for optimization under uncertainty. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 109:1756–1776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.5342.
Fonseca, R. M., Kahrobaei, S. S., Van Gastel, L. J. T., Leeuwenburgh, O., and Jansen, J. D. (2015). Quantification of the impact of ensemble size on the quality of an ensemble gradient using principles of hypothesis testing. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Texas, USA, 23-25 February 2015. SPE-173236-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173236-MS.
Knee-Point Matlab Implementation (2012). https://nl.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/35094-knee-point.
Stordal, A. S., Szklarz, S. P., and Leeuwenburgh, O.. (2016). A theoretical look at ensemble-based optimization in reservoir management. Mathematical Geosciences, 48(4):399–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9598-6.
Van Essen, G., Zandvliet, M., Van den Hof, P., Bosgra, O., and Jansen, J. D. (2009). Robust waterflooding optimization of multiple geological scenarios. SPE Journal, 14(1):202–210. SPE-102913-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102913-PA.