CT Coreflood Study of Transient Foam Flow with Oil
- Jinyu Tang (Delft University of Technology) | Sebastien Vincent-Bonnieu (Shell Global Solutions International) | William R. Rossen (Delft University of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- foam-oil interaction, foam, simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CT corefloods
- 32 in the last 30 days
- 146 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
We present a CT coreflood study of foam flow with two representative oils: hexadecane C16 (benign to foam) and a mixture of 80 wt% C16 and 20 wt% oleic acid (OA) (very harmful to foam). The purpose is to understand the transient dynamics of foam, both generated in-situ and pre-generated, as a function of oil saturation and type. Foam dynamics with oil (generation and propagation) are quantified through sectional pressure-drop measurements. Dual-energy CT imaging monitors phase saturation distributions during the corefloods. With C16, injection with and without pre-generation of foam exhibits similar transient behavior: strong foam moves quickly from upstream to downstream and creates an oil bank. In contrast, with 20 wt% OA, pre-generation of foam gives very different results from co-injection, suggesting that harmful oils affect foam generation and propagation differently. Without pre-generation, initial strong-foam generation is very difficult even at residual oil saturation about 0.1; the generation finally starts from the outlet (a likely result of the capillary-end effect). This strong-foam state propagates backwards against flow and very slowly. The cause of backward propagation is unclear yet. However, pre-generated foam shows two stages of propagation, both from the inlet to outlet. First, weak foam displaces most of the oil, followed by a propagation of stronger foam at lower oil saturation. Implicit-texture foam models for enhanced oil recovery cannot distinguish the different results between the two types of foam injection with very harmful oils. This is because these models do not distinguish between pre-generation and co-injection of gas and surfactant solution.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Alvarez, J. M., Rivas, H. J., & Rossen, W. R., (2001). Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities. SPE-74141-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/74141-PA.
Andrianov, A., Farajzadeh, R., Nick, M. M., Talanana, M., & Zitha, P. L. J. (2011). Immiscible Foam for Enhancing Oil Recovery: Bulk and Porous Media Experiments. In SPE-143578-MS. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/143578-MS.
Alcorn, Z. P., Fredriksen, S. B., Sharma, M., Rognmo, A. U., Føyen, T. L., Fernø, M. A., & Graue, A., (2018). An Integrated CO2 Foam EOR Pilot Program with Combined CCUS in an Onshore Texas Heterogeneous Carbonate Field. In SPE-190204-MS (p. 24). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/190204-MS.
Cheng, L., Reme, A. B., Shan, D., Coombe, D. A., & Rossen, W. R., (2000). Simulating Foam Processes at High and Low Foam Qualities. In SPE-59287-MS. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/59287-MS.
Carpenter, C., (2018). Integrated CO2-Foam Pilot in a Heterogeneous Carbonate Field. SPE-0718-0072-JPT, 70(7), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.2118/0718-0072-JPT.
Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Krastev, R., Hirasaki, G. J., & Rossen, W. R., (2012). Foam-Oil Interaction in Porous Media: Implications for Foam Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 183–184, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.07.002.
Janssen, M. T. G., Zitha, P. L. J., & Pilus, R. M., (2018). Oil Recovery by Alkaline-Surfactant-Foam ASF Flooding: Effect of Drive Foam Quality on Oil Bank Propagation. In SPE-190235-MS (p. 32). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/190235-MS.
Janssen, M. T. G., Pilus, R. M., & Zitha, P. L. J., (2019). A Comparative Study of Gas Flooding and Foam-Assisted Chemical Flooding in Bentheimer Sandstones. Transport in Porous Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-01225-3.
Jensen, J. A., & Friedmann, F., (1987). Physical and Chemical Effects of an Oil Phase on the Propagation of Foam in Porous Media. In SPE-16375-MS (p. 14). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/16375-MS.
Kovscek, A. R., Patzek, T. W., & Radke, C. J., (1995). A Mechanistic Population Balance Model for Transient and Steady- state Foam Flow in Boise sandstone. Chemical Engineering Science, 50(23), 3783–3799. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00199-F.
Myers, T. J., & Radke, C. J., (2000). Transient Foam Displacement in the Presence of Residual Oil: Experiment and Simulation Using a Population-Balance Model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 39(8), 2725–2741. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990909u.
Manrique, E. J., Thomas, C. P., Ravikiran, R., Izadi Kamouei, M., Lantz, M., Romero, J. L., & Alvarado, V., (2010). EOR: Current Status and Opportunities. In SPE-130113-MS (p. 21). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/130113-MS.
Ma, K., Mateen, K., Ren, G., Luo, H., Bourdarot, G., & Morel, D., (2018). Mechanistic Modeling of Foam Flow Through Porous Media in the Presence of Oil: Review of Foam-Oil Interactions and an Improved Bubble Population-Balance Model. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Nguyen, Q. P., Rossen, W. R., Zitha, P. L. J., & Currie, P. K., "Determination of Gas Trapping With Foam Using X-Ray Computed Tomography and Effluent Analysis". Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2009, June 1). doi:10.2118/94764-PA.
Osterloh, W. T., & Jante, M. J.Jr.,, (1992). Effects of Gas and Liquid Velocity on Steady-State Foam Flow at High Temperature. In SPE-24179-MS. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/24179-MS
Persoff, P., Radke, C. J., Pruess, K., Benson, S. M., & Witherspoon, P. A., (1991). A Laboratory Investigation of Foam Flow in Sandstone at Elevated Pressure. SPE-18781-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18781-PA.
Patil, P. D., Knight, T., Katiyar, A., Vanderwal, P., Scherlin, J., Rozowski, P., … Nguyen, Q. P., (2018). CO2 Foam Field Pilot Test in Sandstone Reservoir: Complete Analysis of Foam Pilot Response. In SPE-190312-MS (p. 14). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/190312-MS.
Raterman, K. T., (1989). An Investigation of Oil Destabilization of Nitrogen Foams in Porous Media. In SPE-19692-MS (p. 11). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/19692-MS.
Rossen, W. R., (1996). Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. In Foams: Theory, Measurements, and Applications (pp. 413–464). MaRcel Dekker. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/food.19970410116.
Rossen, W. R., (2013). Numerical Challenges in Foam Simulation: A Review. In SPE-166232-MS. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/166232-MS.
Schramm, L. L., & Novosad, J. J., (1990). Micro-Visualization of Foam Interactions with a Crude Oil. Colloids and Surfaces, 46(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6622(90)80046-7.
Simjoo, M., & Zitha, P. L.J., (2013). Effects of Oil on Foam Generation and Propagation in Porous Media. In SPE-165271- MS. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/165271-MS.
Tang, J., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., & Rossen, W., (2018). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Oil on Steady-State Foam Flow in Porous Media. SPE Journal. https://doi.org/10.2118/194015-PA.
Tang, J., Ansari, M. N., & Rossen, W. R., (2019). Quantitative Modeling of the Effect of Oil on Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Journal. doi:10.2118/194020-PA
Zhou, Z., & Rossen, W. R., (1995). Applying Fractional-Flow Theory to Foam Processes at the "Limiting Capillary Pressure." SPE Advanced Technology Series, 5(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.2118/24180-PA