Production Forecasting: Optimistic and Overconfident – Over and Over Again
- Reidar B Bratvold (University of Stavanger) | Erlend Mohus (University of Stavanger) | David Petutschnig (University of Texas at Austin) | Eric Bickel (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Probabilistic, Production, Optimistic, Overconfident, Forecast
- 16 in the last 30 days
- 285 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The oil & gas industry uses production forecasts to make a number of decisions as mundane as whether to change the choke setting on a well, or as significant as whether to develop a field. As these forecasts are being used to develop cashflow predictions and value and decision metrics such as Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return, their quality is essential for making good decision. Thus, forecasting skills are important for value creation and we should keep track of whether production forecasts are accurate and free from bias.
In this paper we compare probabilistic production forecasts at the time of the development FID with the actual annual production to assess whether the forecasts are biased; i.e., either optimistic, overconfident, or both.
While biases in time and cost estimates in the exploration & production industry are well documented, probabilistic production forecasts have yet to be the focus of a major study. The main reason for this is that production forecasts for exploration & production development projects are not publicly available. Without access to such estimates, the quality of the forecasts cannot be evaluated.
Drawing on the Norwegian Petroleum Directorates (NPD) extensive database, annual production forecasts, given at time of project sanction (FID), for 56 fields in the 1995 – 2017 period, have been compared with actual annual production from the same fields. The NPD guidelines specify that the operators should report the annual mean and P10/90-percentiles for the projected life of the field at the time of the FID; that is, the forecasts should be probabilistic. The actual annual production from the fields was statistically compared with the forecast to investigate if the forecasts were biased and to assess the financial impact of such biases.
This paper presents the results from the first public study of the quality of probabilistic production forecasts. The main conclusions are that production forecasts that are being used at the FID for E&P development projects are both optimistic and overconfident. As production forecasts form the basis for the main investment decision in the life of a field, biased forecasts will lead to poor decisions and to loss of value.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Allen, David P. B. 2017. "Handling Risk and Uncertainty in Portfolio Production Forecasting." SPE Economics & Management 9 (02): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.2118/185178-PA.
Barker, John W., Maarten Cuypers, and Lars Holden. 2001. "Quantifying Uncertainty in Production Forecasts: Another Look at the PUNQ-S3 Problem." SPE Journal 6 (04): 433–41. https://doi.org/10.2118/74707-PA.
Bickel, J, and Reidar Bratvold. 2007. "Decision-Making in the Oil and Gas Industry--From Blissful Ignorance to Uncertainty-Induced Confusion," November. https://doi.org/10.2118/109610-MS.
Omre, Henning, and Ole Petter Lødøen. 2004. "Improved Production Forecasts and History Matching Using Approximate Fluid-Flow Simulators." SPE Journal 9 (03): 339–51. https://doi.org/10.2118/74691-PA.
"Reporting to the Revised National Budget 2019 (RNB2019)." n.d. Accessed June 7, 2019. /en/regulations/reporting_and_applications/national-budget/.
Rivera, Nestor, Nestor Saul Meza, Jeoung Soo Kim, Peter Andrew Clark, Raymond Garber, Andres Fajardo, and Victoria Pena. 2007. "Static and Dynamic Uncertainty Management for Probabilistic Production Forecast in Chuchupa Field, Colombia." SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 10 (04): 433–39. https://doi.org/10.2118/100526-PA.
Flyvbjerg, Bent, Massimo Garbuio, and Dan Lovallo. 2009. "Delusion and Deception in Large Infrastructure Projects: Two Models for Explaining and Preventing Executive Disaster." California Management Review 51 (2): 170–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166485.
Hegstad, Bjørn Kåre, and Omre Henning. 2001. "Uncertainty in Production Forecasts Based on Well Observations, Seismic Data, and Production History." SPE Journal 6 (04): 409–24. https://doi.org/10.2118/74699-PA.