Improved Understanding of Dynamic Fracture Behavior in Unconventional Horizontal Wells Using Wavelet Transformation
- Ebru Unal (University of Houston) | Ali Rezaei (University of Houston) | Fahd Siddiqui (University of Houston) | Fatmir Likrama (Halliburton) | M. Soliman (University of Houston) | Birol Dindoruk (Shell International Exploration and Production, Inc.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- fracture behavior, wavelet transformation/analysis, DFIT, fracture diagnostic, hydraulic fracturing
- 23 in the last 30 days
- 219 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
In the last decade, technical advancements have greatly improved the design and execution efficiency of well completions, leading to improved recovery from unconventional reservoirs. However, analyzing fracture diagnostic tests in unconventional plays are still challenging due to high uncertainty in predictive capabilities in the context of fracture dynamics during treatment. The main objective of this study is to identify fracture behavior during injection and pressure fall-off periods in hydraulic fracturing treatments and diagnostic fracture injection tests (DFIT), respectively.
In this study, discrete wavelet transformation (DWT) was used to analyze real field injection and fall-off data in the wavelet domain. The analyzed data are from multi-stage hydraulic fracturing operations and DFIT in unconventional horizontal wells. DWT coefficients reveal very crucial information related to the nature of the events within recorded signals; they also reveal various patterns that are hard to recognize otherwise. The high-frequency components of the pressure and rate signals (detail coefficients) that are calculated by the wavelet transformation determine localization and separation of various events. We compared the identified events for injection and fall-off periods with moving reference point (MRP) and G-function analysis, respectively.
The main advantage of our proposed approach is that it is based on real-time data and does not require any assumptions related to existing or created fractures. Also, it is very sensitive to physical changes in the system; thus, it reveals hidden information related to those changes. Consequently, the energy of detail coefficients represents several events at different frequencies. We used pseudo-frequency of wavelet coefficients as a diagnostic tool for an accurate comparison of fracture propagation and fracture closure events to determine similarities and differences between them. For example, the signal energy of detail coefficients from the wavelet transformation of hydraulic fracturing data demonstrates abrupt frequency changes during dilation or fracture height growth during fracture propagation. Therefore, we were able to identify those events by energy density analysis in both time and pseudo-frequency domains in an objective manner, which otherwise was not possible with conventional methodologies such as G- function derivative analysis.
This paper details the successful methodology for effective implementation of a new fracture diagnostic technique for fracturing operations or DFITs in unconventional horizontal wells. This new fracture diagnostic method does not require any reservoir or fracture pre-assumptions; it mainly relies on the pressure behavior, which is a result of various events at different frequencies. Pressure fall-off behavior of a DFIT gives essential information related to closure event of the created mini-fracture. Identification of these events at different pseudo-frequency ranges improves the understanding of the dynamic fracture behavior also the characteristics of the reservoir. Unlike many other diagnostic techniques, this data-driven approach requires minimum input/data for analysis. This approach also lends itself to real-time application quite easily.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Aballe, A., Bethencourt, M., Botana, F. J., and Marcos, M. 1999. Using Wavelets Transform in the Analysis of Electrochemical Noise Data. Electrochimica Acta 44 (26): 4805-4816. 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00222-4.
Barree, R. D., and Mukherjee, H. 1996. Determination of Pressure Dependent Leakoff and Its Effect on Fracture Geometry. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 6-9 October. SPE-36424-MS. 10.2118/36424-MS.
Barree, R. D., Barree, V. L., and Craig, D. 2009. Holistic Fracture Diagnostics: Consistent Interpretation of Prefrac Injection Tests Using Multiple Analysis Methods. SPE Production & Operations 24 (03): 396-406. SPE-107877-PA. 10.2118/107877-PA
Chandrasekhar, E. and Rao, V.E. 2012. Wavelet Analysis of Geophysical Well-log Data of Bombay Offshore Basin, India. Mathematical Geosciences, 44 (8): 901-928. 10.1007/s11004-012-9423-4
Craig, D., and Blasingame, T. A. 2006. Application of a New Fracture-Injection/Falloff Model Accounting for Propagating, Dilated, and Closing Hydraulic Fractures. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, 15-17 May. SPE-100578-MS. 10.2118/100578-MS
Guan, L., Du, Y., and Li, L. 2004. Wavelets in Petroleum Industry: Past, Present and Future. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 26-29 September. SPE-89952-MS. 10.2118/89952-MS
Haar, A. 1910. Zur Theorie Der Orthogonalen Funktionensysteme. Mathematische Annalen. 69 (3): 331-371. 10.1007/BF01456326
Engelder, T., Lash, G.G., Uzcategui, R. S. 2009. Joint sets that enhance production from Middle and Upper Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin. AAPG Bulletin 93: (7) 857-889. 10.1306/03230908032
Jansen, F. E., and Kelkar, M. G. 1997. Application of Wavelets to Production Data In Describing Inter-Well Relationships. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5-8 October. SPE-38876-MS. 10.2118/38876-MS.
Junsheng, C., Dejie, Y., and Yu, Y. 2005. Time-energy density analysis based on wavelet transform. Ndt & E International 38 (7): 569-572. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.02.002
Lei, L., Wang, C. and Liu, X. 2013. Discrete Wavelet Transform Decomposition Level Determination Exploiting Sparseness Measurement. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering 7 (9): 691-694. 10.5281/zenodo.1087700
Marongiu-Porcu, M., Ehlig-Economides, C. A., and Economides, M. J. 2011. Global Model for Fracture Falloff Analysis.Presented at the SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, Texas, 14-16 June. SPE-144028-MS. 10.2118/144028-MS
McClure, M. W., Blyton, C. J.. 2014. The Effect of Changing Fracture Compliance on Pressure Transient Behavior During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27-29 October. SPE-170956-MS. 10.2118/170956-MS.
Nolte, K. G., Maniere, J. L.. 1997. After-Closure Analysis of Fracture Calibration Tests. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5-8 October. SPE-38676-MS. 10.2118/38676-MS.
Nolte, K.G. and Smith, M.B. 1979. Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, 23-26 September. SPE-8297-MS. 10.2118/8297-MS.
Nolte, K.G. 1986. A General Analysis of Fracturing Pressure Decline with Application to Three Models. SPE Formation Evaluation 1 (06): 571-583. SPE-12941-PA. 10.2118/12941-PA.
Pirayesh, E., Soliman, M.Y. and Rafiee, M. 2013. Make Decision On The Fly: A New Method To Interpret Pressure-Time Data During Fracturing-Application To Frac Pack. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September-02 October. SPE-166132-MS. 10.2118/166132-MS.
Smith, M.T., Macdonald, D.D. 2009. Wavelet Analysis of Electrochemical Noise Data. Corrosion NA CE International 65 (7): 438-448. Paper No 05355. 10.5006/1.3319148.
Soliman, M.Y., Ansah, J., Stephenson, S. and Mandal, B. 2003. Application of Wavelet Transform To Analysis of Pressure Transient Data. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering SPE-83670-PA. 10.2118/83670-PA
Surjaatmadja, J.B., Stephenson, S., Bhaumik, C., Thompson, S. and Cheng, A. 2002. Analysis of Generated And Reflected Pressure Waves During Fracturing Reveals Fracture Behavior. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September- 2 October. SPE-77598-MS. 10.2118/77598-MS.
Unal, E., Siddiqui, F. and Soliman, M.Y. 2018. Wavelet Analysis of Fracturing Pressure Data. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 23-25 January. SPE-189885-MS. 10.2118/189885-MS
Unal, E., Siddiqui, F., Soliman, M.Y. and Dindoruk, B. 2019. Wavelet Analysis of DFIT Data to Identify Fracture Closure Parameters. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition,Woodlands, Texas, 5-7 February. SPE-194326-MS. 10.2118/194326-MS
Xie, L., Yan, P., Lu, W., Chen, M., and Wang, G. 2018. Comparison of seismic effects during deep tunnel excavation with different methods. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 17 (3): 659-675.10.1007/s11803-018-0452-y.