Methods for Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification with Reliable Subsurface Assessment and Robust Decision-Making
- Shusei Tanaka (Chevron Energy Technology Company) | Kaveh Dehghani (Chevron Energy Technology Company) | Wang Zhenzhen (Chevron Energy Technology Company)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Uncertainty Quantification, Reliable Forecast, decision making, History Matching, deepwater asset
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 254 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Reliability of subsurface assessment for different field development scenarios depends on how effective the uncertainty in production forecast is quantified. Currently there is a body of work in the literature on different methods to quantify the uncertainty in production forecast. The objective of this paper is to revisit and compare these probabilistic uncertainty quantification techniques through their applications to assisted history matching of a deep-water offshore waterflood field. The paper will address the benefits, limitations, and the best criteria for applicability of each technique.
Three probabilistic history matching techniques commonly practiced in the industry are discussed. These are Design-of-Experiment (DoE) with rejection sampling from proxy, Ensemble Smoother (ES) and Genetic Algorithm (GA). The model used for this study is an offshore waterflood field in Gulf-of-Mexico. Posterior distributions of global subsurface uncertainties (e.g. regional pore volume and oil-water contact) were estimated using each technique conditioned to the injection and production data.
The three probabilistic history matching techniques were applied to a deep-water field with 13 years of production history. The first 8 years of production data was used for the history matching and estimate of the posterior distribution of uncertainty in geologic parameters. While the convergence behavior and shape of the posterior distributions were different, consistent posterior means were obtained from Bayesian workflows such as DoE or ES. In contrast, the application of GA showed differences in posterior distribution of geological uncertainty parameters, especially those that had small sensitivity to the production data. We then conducted production forecast by including infill wells and evaluated the production performance using sample means of posterior geologic uncertainty parameters. The robustness of the solution was examined by performing history matching multiple times using different initial sample points (e.g. random seed). This confirmed that heuristic optimization techniques such as GA were unstable since parameter setup for the optimizer had a large impact on uncertainty characterization and production performance.
This study shows the guideline to obtain the stable solution from the history matching techniques used for different conditions such as number of simulation model realizations and uncertainty parameters, and number of datapoints (e.g. maturity of the reservoir development). These guidelines will greatly help the decision-making process in selection of best development options.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Aanonsen, S. I.,Nævdal, G.,Oliver, D. S.,Reynolds, A. C., and Vallès, B. 2009. The Ensemble Kalman Filter in Reservoir Engineering--a Review: SPE Journal 14(03): 393–412, doi: 10.2118/117274-PA.
Anterion, F.,Eymard, R., and Karcher, B. 1989. Use of Parameter Gradients for Reservoir History Matching: Paper SPE-18433-MS presented at the SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, 6-8 February, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/18433-MS.
Babin, V.,Yaubatyrov, R. R.,Ushmaev, O.,García, D. K., Golitsyna, M.,Semenikhin, A., and Ciaurri, D. E. 2017. A Variant of Particle Swarm Optimization for Uncertainty Quantification: Paper SPE-186024-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, 8–10 May, Abu Dhabi, UAE, doi: 10.2118/186024-MS.
Bhark, E. W., and Dehghani, K. 2014. Assisted History Matching Benchmarking: Design of Experiments-based Techniques: Paper SPE-170690-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27-29 October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, doi: 10.2118/170690-MS.
Brun, B.,Gosselin, O., and Barker, J. W. 2004. Use of Prior Information in Gradient-Based History Matching: SPE Journal 9 (01): 67–78, doi: 10.2118/87680-PA.
Caers, J., and Hoffman, T., 2006. The probability perturbation method: a new look at Bayesian inverse modeling: Mathematical geology 38(1): 81–100, doi: 10.1007/s11004-005-9005-9.
Canchumuni, S. A.,Emerick, A. A., and Pacheco, M. A. 2017. Integration of Ensemble Data Assimilation and Deep Learning for History Matching Facies Models: Paper OTC-28015-MS presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, 24-26 October, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, doi: 10.4043/28015-MS.
Chen, Y., and Oliver, D. S. 2012. Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood Method as an Iterative Ensemble Smoother: Mathematical Geosciences 44(1): 1–26, doi: 10.1007/s11004-011-9376-z.
Cheng, H.,Dehghani, K., and Billiter, T. C. 2008. A Structured Approach for Probabilistic-Assisted History Matching Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Tengiz Field Applications: Paper SPE-116212-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 21-24 September, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/116212-MS.
Dogru, A. H. and Seinfeld, J. H. 1981. Comparison of Sensitivity Coefficient Calculation Methods in Automatic History Matching (includes associated paper 10873): SPE Journal 21(05): 551–557, doi: 10.2118/8251-PA.
Emerick, A. A., and Reynolds, A. C. 2013. History-Matching Production and Seismic Data in a Real Field Case Using the Ensemble Smoother With Multiple Data Assimilation: Paper SPE-163675-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 18-20 February, The Woodlands, Texas U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/163675-MS.
Floris, F. J. T.,Bush, M. D.,Cuypers, M.,Roggero, F., and Syversveen, A. R., 2001. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study: Petroleum Geoscience, 7(S): 87–96, doi: 10.1144/petgeo.7.S.S87.
Friedmann, F.,Chawathe A., and Larue, D. K., 2003 Assessing Uncertainty in Channelized Reservoirs Using Experimental Design: SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 16 (10): 1,171–1,176, doi: 10.2118/915-PA.
Fu, J.,Wen, X.-H., and Du, S. 2017. Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and History Matching of Large-Scale Fields Through Model Reduction: Geostatistics Valencia 2016: 531–540, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_35.
Gao, G.,Vink, J. C.,Chen, C.,Araujo, M.,Ramirez, B.,Jennings, J. W.,Ita, J. 2018. Robust Uncertainty Quantification through Integration of Distributed Gauss-Newton Optimization with Gaussian Mixture Model and Parallelized Sampling Algorithms. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/191516-MS
Hastings, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications: Biometrika 57(1): 97–109, doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97.
Park, H. Y.,Datta-Gupta, A., and King, M. J. 2015. Handling conflicting multiple objectives using Pareto-based evolutionary algorithm during history matching of reservoir performance: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 125: 48–66, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.006.
Peters, L.,Arts, R.,Brouwer, G.,Geel, C.,Cullick, S.,Lorentzen, R. J.,Chen, Y.,Dunlop, N.,Vossepoel, F. C.,Xu, R. and Sarma, P. 2010. Results of the Brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching: SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 13(03): 391–405, doi: 10.2118/119094-PA.
Hoffman, B. T.,Caers, J. K.,Wen, X., and Strebelle, S. B. 2006. A Practical Data Integration Approach to History Matching: Application to a Deepwater Reservoir: SPE Journal 11 (04): 464–479, doi: 10.2118/95557-PA.
Jansen, J. -D.,Brouwer, R., and Douma, S. G. 2009. Closed Loop Reservoir Management: Paper SPE-119098-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2-4 February, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/119098-MS.
Leverett, M. C. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids: Transactions of the AIME 142(01): 152–169, doi: 10.2118/941152-G.
Li, R.,Reynolds, A. C., and Oliver, D. S. 2003. Sensitivity Coefficients for Three-Phase Flow History Matching: Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 42 (04): 70–77, doi: 10.2118/03-04-04.
Liu, Y.,Sun, W., and Durlofsky, L. J. 2018. A Deep-Learning-Based Geological Parameterization for History Matching Complex Models: Mathematical Geosciences: 1–42, doi: 10.1007/s11004-019-09794-9.
Lorenz, J.,Bray, B. G. and Clark, C. R. 1964. Calculating Viscosities of Reservoir Fluids From Their Compositions: Journal of Petroleum Technology 16 (10): 1,171–1,176, doi: 10.2118/915-PA.
Ma, X.,Al-Harbi, M.,Datta-Gupta, A.,Efendiev, Y. 2008. An Efficient Two-Stage Sampling Method for Uncertainty Quantification in History Matching Geological Models: SPE Journal 13(1): 77–87, doi: 10.2118/102476-PA.
Min, B.,Kang, J. M.,Lee, H.,Jo, S.,Park, C., and Jang, I. 2016. Development of a robust multi-objective history matching for reliable well-based production forecasts: Energy Exploration & Exploitation 34(6): 795–809, doi: 10.1177/0144598716665008.
Mohamed, L.,Christie, M. A., & Demyanov, V. 2011. History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification: Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimisation Approach: Paper SPE-143067-MS presented at the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 23-26 May, Vienna, Austria, doi: 10.2118/143067-MS.
Mohamed, L.,Christie, M.,Demyanov, V. 2010. Comparison of stochastic sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification: SPE Journal 15(1): 31–38, doi: 10.2118/119139-PA.
Olalotiti-Lawal, F.,Onishi, T.,Datta-Gupta, A.,Fujita, Y.,Watanabe, D., and Hagiwara, K. 2018. Post-Combustion CO2 WAG Pilot in a Mature Field: Model Calibration and Optimization: Paper SPE-191472-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 September, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/191472-MS.
Osdal, B.,Husby, O.,Aronsen, H. A.,Chen, N., and Alsos, T. 2006. Mapping the fluid front and pressure buildup using 4D data on Norne Field: The Leading Edge 25(9): 1134–1141, doi: 10.1190/1.2349818.
Paige, C. C. and Saunders, M. A. 1982. LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares: ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 8(1): 43–71, doi: 10.1145/355984.355989.
Park, H. Y.,Datta-Gupta, A. and King, M. J., 2015. Handling conflicting multiple objectives using Pareto-based evolutionary algorithm during history matching of reservoir performance: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 125: 48–66, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.006.
Razavi, S.,Tolson, B. A., and Burn, D. H. 2012. Review of surrogate modeling in water resources: Water Resources Research 48(7): 1–32, doi: 10.1029/2011wr011527.
Romero, C. E.,Carter, J. N.,Gringarten, A. C., and Zimmerman, R. W. 2000. A Modified Genetic Algorithm for Reservoir Characterisation: Paper SPE-64765-MS presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 7-10 November, Beijing, China, doi: 10.2118/64765-MS.
Schulze-Riegert, R. W.,Axmann, J. K.,Haase, O.,Rian, D. T., and You, Y.-L. 2002. Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to History Matching of Complex Reservoirs: SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 5(2): 163–173, doi: 10.2118/77301-PA.
Sanghyun, L., and Stephen, K. D. 2018. Optimizing Automatic History Matching for Field Application Using Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization: Paper OTC-28401-MS presented at the Offshore Technology Conference Asia, 20-23 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, doi: 10.4043/28401-MS.
Skjervheim, J.A., and Evensen, G. 2011. An ensemble smoother for assisted history matching: Paper SPE-141929-MS presented in SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 21-23 February, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/141929-MS.
Skjervheim, J. A.,Evensen, G.,Aanonsen, S. I.,Ruud, B. O., and Johansen, T. A. 2005. Incorporating 4D seismic data in reservoir simulation models using ensemble Kalman filter: Paper SPE-95789-PA presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9-12 October, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A, doi: 10.2118/95789-MS.
Smith, P.,Beven, K.,Weerts, A. H., and Leedal, D. 2012. Adaptive correction of deterministic models to produce probabilistic forecasts: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16(8): 2783–2799, doi: 10.5194/hess-16-2783-2012.
Solomatine, D. P.,Dibike, Y. B., and Kukuric, N. 1999. Automatic calibration of groundwater models using global optimization techniques: Hydrological Sciences Journal 44(6): 879–894, doi: 10.1080/02626669909492287.
Tanaka, S.,Wang, Z.,Dehghani, K.,He, J.,Velusamy, B., and Wen, X.-H. 2018. Large Scale Field Development Optimization Using High Performance Parallel Simulation and Cloud Computing Technology: Paper SPE-191728-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 September, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/191728-MS.
Tavakoli, R., and Reynolds, A. C. 2009. History Matching With Parametrization Based on the SVD of a Dimensionless Sensitivity Matrix: Paper SPE-118952-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2-4 February, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/118952-MS.
Vasco, D. W.,Yoon, S., and Datta-Gupta, A. 1998. Integrating dynamic data into high-resolution reservoir models using streamline-based analytic sensitivity coefficients: Paper SPE-49002-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27-30 September, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A, doi: 10.2118/49002-MS.
Vega, L.,Rojas, D., and Datta-Gupta, A. 2004. Scalability of the Deterministic and Bayesian Approaches to Production-Data Integration Into Reservoir Models: SPE Journal 9 (03): 330–338, doi: 10.2118/88961-PA.
Vrugt, J. A.,ter Braak, C. J. F.,Diks, C. G. H.,Robinson, B. A.,Hyman, J. M., and Higdon, D. 2009. Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling: International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 10(3): 273–290, doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273.
Wen, X. -H., and Chen, W. C. 2006. Real-Time Reservoir Model Updating Using Ensemble Kalman Filter With Confirming Option: SPE Journal 11(4): 431–442, doi: 10.2118/92991-PA.
Wen, X. -H.,Deutsch, C. V., and Cullick, A. S. 2003. Inversion of dynamic production data for permeability: fast streamline-based computation of sensitivity coefficients of fractional flow rate: Journal of Hydrology 281(4): 296–312, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00192-6.
Williams, M. A.,Keating, J. F., and Barghouty, M. F. 1998. The Stratigraphic Method: A Structured Approach to History Matching Complex Simulation Models: SPE Journal 1 (02): 169–176, doi: 10.2118/38014-PA.
Yang, C.,Nghiem, L. X.,Card, C., and Bremeier, M. 2007. Reservoir Model Uncertainty Quantification Through Computer-Assisted History Matching: Paper SPE-109825-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 11-14 November, Anaheim, California, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/109825-MS.
Zhang, F.,Skjervheim, J. A.,Reynolds, A. C., and Oliver, D. S. 2006. Automatic History Matching in a Bayesian Framework, Example Applications: Paper SPE-84461-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 September, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., doi: 10.2118/84461-MS.