A Bayesian Approach for Optimizing the Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection Performance in Shale Reservoirs Under Parametric Uncertainty: A Duvernay Shale Example
- Hamidreza Hamdi (University of Calgary) | Christopher R. Clarkson (University of Calgary) | Ali Esmail (Encana Corporation) | Mario Costa Sousa (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 3-6 June, London, England, UK
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Markov chain Monte Carlo, Huff-n-Puff, Optimization Under Uncertainty, Surrogate Modeling, Shale
- 30 in the last 30 days
- 104 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Recent studies have indicated that Huff-n-Puff (HNP) gas injection has the potential to recover an additional 30-70% oil from multi-fractured horizontal wells in shale reservoirs. Nonetheless, this technique is very sensitive to production constraints and is impacted by uncertainty related to measurement quality (particularly frequency and resolution), and lack of constraining data. In this paper, a Bayesian workflow is provided to optimize the HNP process under uncertainty using a Duvernay shale well as an example.
Compositional simulations are conducted which incorporate a tuned PVT model and a set of measured cyclic injection/compaction pressure-sensitive permeability data. Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) is used to estimate the posterior distributions of the model uncertain variables by matching the primary production data. The McMC process is accelerated by employing an accurate proxy model (kriging) which is updated using a highly adaptive sampling algorithm. Gaussian Processes are then used to optimize the HNP control variables by maximizing the lower confidence interval (μ-σ) of cumulative oil production (after 10 years) across a fixed ensemble of uncertain variables sampled from posterior distributions.
The uncertain variable space includes several parameters representing reservoir and fracture properties. The posterior distributions for some parameters, such as primary fracture permeability and effective half-length, are narrower, while wider distributions are obtained for other parameters. The results indicate that the impact of uncertain variables on HNP performance is nonlinear. Some uncertain variables (such as molecular diffusion) that do not show strong sensitivity during the primary production strongly impact gas injection HNP performance. The results of optimization under uncertainty confirm that the lower confidence interval of cumulative oil production can be maximized by an injection time of around 1.5 months, a production time of around 2.5 months, and very short soaking times. In addition, a maximum injection rate and a flowing bottomhole pressure around the bubble point are required to ensure maximum incremental recovery. Analysis of the objective function surface highlights some other sets of production constraints with competitive results. Finally, the optimal set of production constraints, in combination with an ensemble of uncertain variables, results in a median HNP cumulative oil production that is 30% greater than that for primary production.
The application of a Bayesian framework for optimizing the HNP performance in a real shale reservoir is introduced for the first time. This work provides practical guidelines for the efficient application of advanced machine learning techniques for optimization under uncertainty, resulting in better decision making.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||23|
Aanonsen, S.I., Aavatsmark, I., Barkve, T.. 2003. Effect of Scale Dependent Data Correlations in an Integrated History Matching Loop Combining Production Data and 4D Seismic Data. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium,, Houston, Texas, USA, 3-5 February. SPE-79665-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/79665-MS.
Alfarge, D., Wei, M., and Bai, B. 2017a. Factors Affecting CO2-EOR in Shale-Oil Reservoirs: Numerical Simulation Study and Pilot Tests. Energy & Fuels 31 (8): 8462-8480. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01623.
Alfarge, D., Wei, M., and Bai, B. 2017b. IOR Methods in Unconventional Reservoirs of North America: Comprehensive Review. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, 23-27 April. SPE-185640-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185640-MS.
Christie, M.A. and Bazargan, H. 2012. Efficient Polynomial Chaos Proxy-based History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification for Complex Geological Structures. Presented at the SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 10-12 December. SPE-163282-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163282-MS.
Cotter, S.C. 1979. A screening design for factorial experiments with interactions. Biometrika 66 (2): 317-320. 10.1093/biomet/66.2.317.
Crombecq, K., Tommasi, L.D., Gorissen, D.. 2009. A novel sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling. Proc., Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 13-16 Dec. 2009, 731-742. 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429687.
Fai-Yengo, V., Rahnema, H., and Alfi, M. 2014. Impact of Light Component Stripping During CO2 Injection in Bakken Formation. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 25-27 August. URTEC-1922932-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1922932.
Fothergill, P., Boskovic, D., Schoellkopf, N.. 2014. Regional Modelling of the Late Devonian Duvernay Formation, Western Alberta, Canada. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 25-27 August. URTEC-1923935-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1923935.
Gamadi, T.D., Sheng, J.J., and Soliman, M.Y. 2013. An Experimental Study of Cyclic Gas Injection to Improve Shale Oil Recovery. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September-2 October. SPE-166334-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166334-MS.
Gamadi, T.D., Sheng, J.J., Soliman, M.Y.. 2014. An Experimental Study of Cyclic CO2 Injection to Improve Shale Oil Recovery. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 12-16 April. SPE-169142-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169142-MS.
Geman, S. and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on PAMI-6 (6): 721-741. 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596.
Gong, W., Cai, Z., and Wang, Y. 2014. Repairing the crossover rate in adaptive differential evolution. Applied Soft Computing 15: 149-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2013.11.005.
Goodwin, N. 2015. Bridging the Gap Between Deterministic and Probabilistic Uncertainty Quantification Using Advanced Proxy Based Methods. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 23-25 February. SPE-173301-MS. 10.2118/173301-MS.
Hamdi, H., Behmanesh, H., Clarkson, C.R.. 2015. Using differential evolution for compositional history-matching of a tight gas condensate well in the Montney Formation in western Canada. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26: 1317–1331. 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.015.
Hamdi, H., Clarkson, C.R., Ghanizadeh, A.. 2018a. Huff-N-Puff Gas Injection Performance in Shale Reservoirs: A Case Study From Duvernay Shale in Alberta, Canada. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 23-25 July. URTEC-2902835-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2902835.
Hamdi, H., Couckuyt, I., Costa Sousa, M.. 2017a. Gaussian Processes for history-matching: application to an unconventional gas reservoir. Computational Geosciences 21 (2): 267-287. 10.1007/s10596-016-9611-2.
Hamdi, H., Couckuyt, I., Dhaene, T.. 2018b. Efficient Multi-Objective History-Matching Using Gaussian Processes. Presented at the ECMOR XVI - 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery Barcelona, Spain, 03 September 2018. 10.3997/2214-4609.201802146.
Hamdi, H., Sousa, M.C., and Behmanesh, H. 2017b. Bayesian History-Matching and Probabilistic Forecasting for Tight and Shale Wells. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15-16 February. SPE-185082-MS. 10.2118/185082-MS.
Hao, S., Dengen, Z., Adwait, C.. 2016. Quantifying Shale Oil Production Mechanisms by Integrating a Delaware Basin Well Data from Fracturing to Production. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 1-3 August. URTEC-2425721-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2425721.
Hoffman, B.T. 2018. Huff-N-Puff Gas Injection Pilot Projects in the Eagle Ford. Presented at the SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13-14 March. SPE-189816-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189816-MS.
Hoffman, T. and Evans, J.G. 2016. Improved Oil Recovery IOR Pilot Projects in the Bakken Formation. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5-6 May. SPE-180270-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180270-MS.
Khabibullin, R., Emadi, A., Abu Grin, Z.. 2017. Investigation of CO2 Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery in a North African Field - A New Approach to EOS Development. Presented at the IOR 2017 - 19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery Stavanger, Norway, 24 - 27 April. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201700276.
Li, L. and Sheng, J.J. 2016. Experimental study of core size effect on CH4 huff-n-puff enhanced oil recovery in liquid-rich shale reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 34: 1392-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.028.
Pu, W. and Hoffman, B.T. 2014. EOS Modeling and Reservoir Simulation Study of Bakken Gas Injection Improved Oil Recovery in the Elm Coulee Field, Montana. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 25-27 August. URTEC-1922538-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1922538.
Rassenfoss, S. 2017. Shale EOR Works, But Will It Make a Difference? Journal of Petroleum Technology 10 (69): 34-40. https://doi.org/10.2118/1017-0034-JPT.
Sheng, J.J. 2017. Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs. Petroleum: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2017.03.004.
Sobol', I.M. 1967. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (4): 86-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9.
Song, C. and Yang, D. 2013. Performance Evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Processes in Tight Oil Formations. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 5-7 November. https//doi.org/10.2118/167217-MS.
Sudret, B. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 (7): 964-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002.
Yu, W., Lashgari, H., and Sepehrnoori, K. 2014. Simulation Study of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process in Bakken Tight Oil Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 17-18 April. SPE-169575-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169575-MS.