Mechanisms for Huff-n-Puff Cyclic Gas Injection into Unconventional Reservoirs
- B. Todd Hoffman (Montana Tech) | Jeffrey M. Rutledge (QPlus Energy LLC)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Symposium, 9-10 April, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 4.1.9 Tanks and storage systems, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 2 Well completion, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors
- unconventional, mechanisms, gas injection
- 57 in the last 30 days
- 192 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Unconventional oil reservoirs such as the Eagle Ford have had tremendous success over the last decade, but challenges remain as flow rates drop quickly and recovery factors are low; thus, enhanced oil recovery methods are needed to increase recovery. Interest in cyclic gas injection has risen as a number of successful pilots have been reported; however, little information is available on recovery mechanisms for the process. This paper evaluates oil swelling caused by diffusion and advection processes for gas injection in unconventional reservoirs.
To accurately evaluate gas penetration into the matrix, the surface area of the hydraulic fractures needs to be known, and in this work, three different methods are used to estimate the area: volumetrics, well flow rates and linear fluid flow equations. Fick's law is used to determine the gas penetration depth caused by diffusion, and the linear form of Darcy's law is used to find the amount from advection. Then, with the use of swelling test information from lab tests, we are able to approximate the amount of oil recovery expected from cyclic gas injection operations.
During the gas injection phase, gas from the fractures can enter the matrix by both advection (Darcy driven flow) and diffusion. We estimate that over 200 million scf of gas can enter the matrix during a 100 day injection/soak period. Using typical reservoir and fluid parameters, it appears that 40% is due to diffusion and 60% is due to advection. Sensitivity analysis shows that these numbers vary considerable based on the parameters used. Analytical models also show that during a 100 day production timeframe, over 14,000 stock tank barrels (STB) of oil can be produced due to huff-n-puff gas injection.
Both gas injection and oil recovery amounts are compared to recent Eagle Ford gas injection pilot data, and the model results are consistent with the field pilot data.
By determining the relative importance of the different recovery mechanisms, this paper provides a better understanding of what is happening in unconventional reservoirs during cyclic gas injection. This will allow more efficient injection schemes to be designed in the future.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Bhandari, A.R., Flemings, P.B., Hofmann, R. and Polito P.J., (2018) Transport in Porous Media, v. 123, Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1021-6
Chen, C., Balhoff, M. T., & Mohanty, K. K. (2014). Effect of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Primary Recovery and CO2 Huff "n" Puff Recovery in Shale-Oil Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/164553-PA
Energy Information Administration (ETA), (2015). U.S. Field Production of Crude Oil, http://www.eia.govidnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPUSl&f=M
Gherabati, S. A., Hammes, U., Male, F., & Browning, J. (2018). Assessment of Hydrocarbon in Place and Recovery Factors in the Eagle Ford Shale Play. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/189982-PA
Hawthorne, S. B., Gorecki, C. D., Sorensen, J. A., Steadman, E. N., Harju, J. A., & Melzer, S. (2013). Hydrocarbon Mobilization Mechanisms from Upper, Middle, and Lower Bakken Reservoir Rocks Exposed to CO. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/167200-MS
Hoffman, B. T., (2018) Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection Pilot Projects in the Eagle Ford. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/189816-MS
Hoffman, B. T. and Evans, J. G., (2016). Improved Oil Recovery (IOR) Pilot Projects in the Bakken Formation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/180270-MS
King, George E., (2014) Maximizing Recovery Factors: Improving Recovery Factors In Liquids-Rich Resource Plays Requires New Approaches. The American Oil and Gas Reporter. https://www.aogr.com/magazine/editors-choice/archives/2019
Li, S., and Luo, P., (2017) Experimental and Simulation Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure for a Bakken Tight Oil and Different Injection Gases, Petroleum, doi:10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.011.
Mobilia, M., Lieskovsky, J. and Yan, R., (2016) Initial production rates in tight oil formations continue to rise. U.S. Energy Information Administration. February 11, 2016 https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=24932
Mostinsky, J., (2011). Diffusion Coefficient. Thermopedia, Article added: 2 February 2011. doi: 10.1615/AtoZ.d.diffusion_coefficient
Perkins, T. K., & Johnston, O. C. (1963). A Review of Diffusion and Dispersion in Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/480-PA
Raterman, K. T., Farrell, H. E., Mora, O. S., Janssen, A. L., Gomez, G. A.,… Warren, M. (2018). Sampling a Stimulated Rock Volume: An Eagle Ford Example. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/191375-PA
Thomas, W. R., Helms, L. W., Driggers T. K., Trice, D. W. and Thomas, G. L.; (2016) EOG Resources (EOG) Earnings Call, May 06, 2016. http://investors.eogresources.com/
Tovar, F. D., Barrufet, M. A., & Schechter, D. S. (2018). Gas Injection for EOR in Organic Rich Shales. Part II: Mechanisms of Recovery. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. doi:10.15530/URTEC-2018-2903026
Tovar, F. D., Eide, O., Graue, A., & Schechter, D. S. (2014). Experimental Investigation of Enhanced Recovery in Unconventional Liquid Reservoirs using CO2: A Look Ahead to the Future of Unconventional EOR. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/169022-MS
Vega, B., O'Brien, W. J., & Kovscek, A. R. (2010). Experimental Investigation of Oil Recovery from Siliceous Shale by Miscible CO2 Injection. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/135627-MS