Evaluation of a New Environmentally Friendly Flowback Surfactant and Its Application to Enhance Oil and Gas Productivity
- Ahmed Rabie (Solvay) | Jian Zhou (Solvay) | Qi Qu (Solvay)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 18-21 March, Manama, Bahrain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2 Well completion, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing
- flowback surfactant, water recovery, Oil and gas productivity, Interfacial tension, coreflood
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 125 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Surfactants have been used in the oil industry for decades as multi-functions additive in stimulation fluids. In hydraulic fracturing, surfactants and microemulsions have been extensively reported numerously as flowback additives to lower surface and interfacial tension to aid water recovery. Fracturing fluids invade the matrix during the fracturing, and if not recovered, leads to water blockage and a reduction to relative permeability to gas or oil. This problem is more challenging in low- permeability formations since capillary forces have more profound impact on water retention, and hence water recovery and subsequent oil productivity.
In this work, surface tension, interfacial tension, foam stability, sand-packed columns, and coreflood experiments were performed on a selected environmentally friendly water-based surfactant formulation. The performance of the surfactant of interest was compared to two commercial microemulsion and one non-ionic alcohol ethoxylated.
The results confirmed the benefit of using surfactants for flowback compared to non-surfactant case. Surface tension (ST) alone cannot be used as a selecting criterion for flow back. The alcohol exthoxylated, while reducing the ST to same level as the two microemulsions, showed very poor performance in packed column and coreflood tests. Although interfacial tension (IFT) seems to be more reasonable criteria, adsorption and emulsion tendency are other challenges that can hinder the performance of good surfactants with low IFT. Based on the data, a surfactant that lowers the IFT with the selected oil to below 1 mN/m is more likely to outperform other surfactants with higher IFT.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Cawiezel, K.E., Singh, A.K., Carman, P.S.. 2010. The Selection and Optimization of a Surfactant Package to Maximize Cleanup of a High-Density Fracturing Fluid. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, 5–6 October. SPE-136812-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/136812-MS.
Galindo, T.A. and Rimassa, S.M. 2013. Evaluation of Environmentally Acceptable Surfactants for Application as Flowback Aids. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 8–10 April. SPE-164122-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164122-MS.
Kim, J., Zhang, H., Sun, H.. 2016. Choosing Surfactants for the Eagle Ford Shale Formation: Guidelines for Maximizing Flowback and Initial Oil Recovery. Presented at SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5-6 May. SPE-180227-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180227-MS.
Kovalchuk, N.M., Trybala, A., Starov, V.. 2014. Fluoro-vs hydrocarbon surfactants: Why do they differ in wetting performance. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 210: 65–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.003.
Mahmoudkhani, A., O'Neil, B., Wylde, J.J.. 2015. Microemulsions as Flowback Aids for Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery after Fracturing, Myth or Reality: A Turnkey Study to Determine the Features and Benefits. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 13–15 April. SPE-173729-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173729-MS.
Rabie, A., Zhou J., and Qu, Q. 2019. New Insights in the Characteristics Required for A successful Flowback Surfactant and its Use in Tight and Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the 2019 International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bejing, China, 26-28 March. IPTC-19451-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/122109-MS.
Rostami, A., and Nasr-El-Din, H. A. 2014. Microemulsion vs. Surfactant Assisted Gas Recovery in Low Permeability Formations with Water Blockage. Presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Regional Meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, 16–18 April. SPE-169582- MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169582-MS.
Shuler, P. J., Lu, Z., Ma, Q.. 2016. Surfactant Huff-n-Puff Application Potentials for Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 11-13 April. SPE-179667-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179667-MS.
Zelenev, A. S. and Ellena, L. 2009. Microemulsion Technology for Improved Fluid Recovery and Enhanced Core Permeability to Gas. Presented at the 8th European Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 27-29 May. SPE-122109-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/122109-MS.
Zelenev, A. S., Zhou, H., Ellena, L.. 2010. Microemulsion-Assisted Fluid Recovery and Improved Permeability to Gas in Shale Formations. Presented at the International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 10-12 February. SPE-127922-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/127922-MS.
Zhang, H., Marinescu, P., and Foxenberg, W. 2012. Unique Flow-Back Chemistry for Enhancing Productivity of Low-Permeability Reservoir. Presented at IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Tianjin, China, 9-11 July. SPE-155505-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/155505-MS.