Perforation Damage, Cleanup, and Inflow Performance: Advances in Diagnostics and Characterization
- Brenden Grove (Halliburton) | Avrami Grader (Halliburton) | Naum Derzhi (Halliburton) | Jacob McGregor (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 18-21 March, Manama, Bahrain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.3 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2 Well completion, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 1.8 Formation Damage, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.6.2 Core Analysis, 5.6.8 Well Performance Monitoring, Inflow Performance, 2.2.2 Perforating
- inflow, perforation damage, modeling, skin, cleanup
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 132 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Considering the important role that perforation laboratory testing can play in establishing field completion strategies, and thus ultimately well performance, efforts are currently underway to further strengthen the link between laboratory results and field well performance predictions. Some of these efforts focus on integrating advanced diagnostic and computational tools (namely computed tomography (CT), and pore-scale flow simulation) into the perforation testing workflow. This integration enables local variations in permeability and porosity to be identified and quantified, thus improving the interpretation of perforation laboratory results, and ultimately the translation of these results to the downhole environment.
CT techniques have been used for core analysis, characterization, and flow visualization since the early 1980s. By the early 1990s, these techniques were being applied to the investigation of laboratory-perforated cores to enhance the interpretation of tests conducted following API RP19B Section 2 or 4. This application has increased dramatically since 2012, following the installation of a CT scanning system on-site at a perforating laboratory facility. As a result, this non-destructive technique has become a preferred method to routinely characterize perforation tunnels and the surrounding rock, as well as to enable the repeated inspection of a perforated core at multiple steps throughout a test sequence designed to mimic field operations scenarios. Coinciding with this development has been the advancement and application of micro-CT technology to better understand pore-scale phenomena, both near and away from the perforation.
This paper introduces an integrated test program currently underway and summarizes key results from two experiments in which stressed rock targets were perforated under significantly different conditions. The first experiment involved perforating a moderate strength sandstone core under conditions that retained substantially all perforation damage, thus preserving the "crushed zone". Micro-CT analysis of different locations within the crushed zone region revealed significant compaction, with porosity reductions ranging from 10 to 50% below that of the native rock. Permeability at one of these selected locations was determined and found to be reduced by approximately 35% below the native rock value. The second experiment involved perforating a very high-strength sandstone core under conditions intended to produce full cleanup. CT and micro-CT analysis revealed fine fractures near the tunnel tip and confirmed the near-complete removal of the perforation damage, with only a very thin (less than 1 mm) compacted zone remaining at the tunnel wall. Although this region is interpreted to have very low permeability (as indicated by the near-zero connected porosity detectable at the resolution investigated), a fracture network combined with the shell’s minimal thickness suggests that this would provide a minimal impediment to inflow.
Ongoing work aims to expand these findings and capabilities. A main effort going forward centers on simulating core-scale perforation inflow, incorporating the localized rock property variations determined as described in this paper. Additional property variations away from the perforation (for example, natural heterogeneity and/or anisotropy that often exist in reservoir wellcore samples) will also be taken into account. Such localized variations, both near and away from the perforation, are generally not taken into account in typical Section 4 test programs. Consequently, this ongoing effort will ultimately strengthen the relevance of Section 4 results to the downhole environment.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Aly Hussein, M.R., Zeidan, A.A., Ahmed, K.. 2016. Perforating Strategy for Stimulating Viscous Oil Wells for Both Cyclic Steam Stimulation and Steam Flooding Optimizing Using Perforation Laboratory - A Case Study From Kuwait Oil Company. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 6-8 December. SPE-184120-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184120-MS.
Ansah, J., Proett, M.A., and Soliman, M.Y. 2002. Advances in Well Completion Design: A New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model for Optimizing Performance of Perforated Completions. Presented at the International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 20-21 February. SPE-73760-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/73760-MS.
Asadi, M. and Preston, F.W. 1994. Characterization of the Jet Perforation Crushed Zone by SEM and Image Analysis. SPE Formation Evaluation, 9(02): 135-139. SPE-22812-PS. https://doi.org/10.2118/22812-PA.
Asadi, M., Preston, F.W., Green, D.W.. 1994. Effect of the Perforation Damage on Well Productivity. Presented at the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 7-10 February. SPE-27384-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27384-MS.
Ayre, D., Atwood, D., Geerts, S.. 2017. API RP 19B Section 2 Perforation Tests Conducted at Multiple Facilities to Guide the Latest Section 2 Revision. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 9-11 October. SPE-187408-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/187408-MS.
Behrmann, L.A., Pucknell, J.K., Bishop, S.R.. 1991. Measurement of Additional Skin Resulting From Perforation Damage. Paper SPE22809 Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 6-9 October. SPE-22809-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22809-MS.
Behrmann, L.A. 1996. Underbalance Criteria for Minimum Perforation Damage. SPE Drill & Compl 11 (3): 173-177. SPE-30081-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30081-PA.
Bell, W.T., Brieger, E.F., and Harrigan Jr., J.W. 1972. Laboratory Flow Characteristics Of Gun Perforations. J Pet Technol 24 (9): 1095-1103. SPE-3444-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3444-PA.
Crabtree, P., Underdown, D., Grove, B. 2018. Perforation Laboratory Testing: How Close is Close Enough? Presented at the 2018 North America Perforating Symposium, Galveston, Texas, USA, 31 July-1 Aug. https://perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/6_1-2018-NAPS-21-Matching-Field-Conditions-in-the-perforation-laboratory_how-close-is-close-enough.pdf (accessed 22 December 2018).
Deo, M., Tariq, S.M., and Halleck, P.M. 1989. Linear and Radial Flow Targets for Characterizing Downhole Flow in Perforations. SPE Prod Eng 4 (3): 295-300. SPE-16896-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/16896-PA.
Grove, B.M., Harvey, J.P., and Zhan, L. 2013. Perforation Cleanup by Means of Dynamic Underbalance: New Understanding. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 7-10 June. SPE-143997-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/143997-MS.
Grove, B. and Manning, D. 2018. Shaped Charge Perforation Depth at Full Downhole Conditions: New Understandings. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 24-26 September. SPE-191526-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191526-MS.
Haggerty, D.J. 2018. Laboratory Tests Conducted to Perforate and Displace Viscous Oil from Saturated Formation Core to Help Optimize Steam Flood Completion. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Garden Grove, California, USA, 22-26 April. SPE-190111-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190111-MS.
Haggerty, D. and Christie, S. 2015. Operator Uses Advanced Perforation Flow Laboratory to Support HMX Perforating by Coiled Tubing in HPHT Field. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3-5 June. SPE-174173-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174173-MS.
Haggerty, D., Craddock, G., and McGregor, J. 2016. Effects of High Pore Pressure on Perforation Tunnels in Both High and Moderate Compressive Strength Rocks. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 24-26 February. SPE-178944-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/178944-MS.
Haggerty, D., Craddock, G., and McGregor, J. 2018. Investigating the Impact of Dynamic Effective Stress While Perforating Low-Strength Formations. Presented at the SOE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 29-31 January. SPE-189314-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189314-MS.
Halleck, P.M. and Deo, M. 1989. Effects of Underbalance on Perforation Flow. SPE Production Engineering, 4 (02): 113-116. SPE-16895-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/16895-PA.
Halleck, P.M. and Dogulu, Y.S. 1996. Experiments and Computer Analysis Show How Perforators Damage Natural Fractures. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 23-25 October. SPE-37330-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37330-MS.
Halleck, P., Atwood, D., and Black, A. 1992. X-Ray CT Observations of Flow Distribution in a Shaped-Charge Perforation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, USA, 4-7 October. SPE-24771-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24771-MS.
Harris, M.H. 1966. The Effect of Perforating on Well Productivity, J Pet Technol 18 (04): 518-28. SPE-1236-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1236-PA.
Harvey, J.P., Kokel, P.M., Zhan, L.. 2011. Determining Perforation Parameters from Single-Shot Tests: Axial vs. Radial Flow. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 7-10 June. SPE-143993-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/143993-MS
Harvey, J.P., Grove, B.M., and Zhan, L. 2012. Stressed Rock Penetration Depth Correlation. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 15-17 February. SPE-151846-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/151846-MS.
Hong, K.C. 1975. Productivity of Perforated Completions in Formations With or Without Damage, J Pet Technol 27(08): 1027-38. SPE-4653-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4653-PA.
Hsia, T.Y. and Behrmann, L.A. 1991. Perforating Skin as a Function of Rock Permeability and Underbalance. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 6-9 October. SPE-22810-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22810-MS.
Karacan, C.O., Grader, A.S., and Halleck, P.M. 2001. Effect of Pore Fluid Type on Perforation Damage and Flow Characteristics. Presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA. SPE-67290-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/67290-MS.
Karacan, C.O. and Halleck, P.M. 2002. Correlating Particle Size Distribution in a Crushed Zone to Perforating Permeability Damage and Modeling Using Fragmentation Fractal Theory. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October. SPE-77365-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77365-MS.
Karakas, M. and Tariq, S.M. 1991. Semi-Analytical Productivity Models for Perforated Completions, SPE Prod Eng 6 (01): 73-82. SPE-18247-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18247-PA.
King, G.E., Anderson, A., and Bingham, M. 1986. A Field Study of Underbalance Pressures Necessary To Obtain Clean Perforations Using Tubing-Conveyed Perforating. J Pet Technol 38 (06): 662-664. SPE-14321-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14321-PA.
Klotz, J.A., Kreuger, R.F., and Pye, D.S. 1974. Effect of Perforation Damage on Well Productivity, J Pet Technol 26 (11): 1033-44. SPE-4654-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4654-PA.
Locke, S. 1981. An Advanced Method for Predicting the Productivity Ratio of a Perforated Well, J Pet Technol 33 (12): 2481-88. SPE-8804-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/8804-PA.
McDowell, J. M., and Muskat, M. 1950. The Effect on Well Productivity of Formation Penetration Beyond Perforated Casing. J Pet Technol 2 (11): 309-312. SPE-950309-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/950309-G.
McLeod, O.H., Jr. 1983. The Effect of Perforation Conditions on Well Performance, J Pet Technol 26 (11): 31-39. SPE-4654-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4654-PA.
Muskat, M. 1943. The Effect of Casing Perforations on Well Productivity. Transactions of the AIME 151 (01): 175-187. SPE-943175-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/943175-G.
Oliphant, S.C. and Farris, R.F. 1947. A Study of Some Factors Affecting Gun Perforating. Transactions of the AIME 170 (01): 225-242. SPE-947225-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/947225-G.
Osarumwense, O., Satti, R.P., White, R.. 2014. Shaped Charge Selection and Underbalance Optimization Using the Perforation Flow Laboratory for Deepwater Subsea Wells in Offshore Africa. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, 10-11 September. SPE-170259-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170259-MS.
Pucknell, J.K. and Behrmann, L.A. 1991. An Investigation of the Damaged Zone Created by Perforating. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 6-9 October. SPE-22811-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/22811-MS.
Rook, M., Haggerty, D.J., Manning, D.. 2009. Perforator Performance Study Determines Optimum System and Achieves Field Performance Projections. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4-7 October. SPE-124343-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/124343-MS.
Satti, R.P., Bale, D.S., Zuklic, S.N.. 2017a. Digital Rock Simulation: A Novel Approach for Accurate Characterization of Perforation Tunnel Damage. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 23-27 April. SPE-185627-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185627-MS.
Satti, R., Bale, D., Zuklic, S.. 2017b. Multi-Scale Modeling for Damage Characterization and Productivity Prediction around a Perforation Tunnel. Journal of the IPF 1(2): 14-25. https://perforators.org/jipf-second-issue-2017/#undefined15 (accessed 2 January 2019).
Saucier, R.J. and Lands, J.F. 1978. A Laboratory Study of Perforations in Stressed Formation Rocks. J Pet Technol 30 (09): 1,347-1,353. SPE-6758-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6758-PA.
Singh, M. and Lavery, J. 2018. Successful Use of API Section-IV Testing to Select Between Zinc and Steel Case Shaped-Charges in a Dual-Zone Cased-Hole Gravel Pack Tubing-Conveyed-Perforating Operation for a Gas Well: Case Study. Presented at the 2018 Asia Pacific Perforating Symposium, Kuala-Lumpur, Malaysia, 19-20 March. https://perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1.4.2_APPS-04-18_Successful_Use_Section_IV_CaseStudy_MandeepSingh_Halliburton_03-0152788-01.pdf (accessed 2 January 2019).
Tolke, J., Baldwin, C., Mu, Y.. 2010. Computer Simulations of Fluid Flow in Sediments: from Images to Permeability. The Leading Edge, 29 (01): 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.3284055.
Walton, I., Johnson, A., Behrmann, L.. 2001. Laboratory Experiments Provide New Insights into Underbalanced Perforating. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September-3 October. SPE-71642-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71642-MS.
Weeks, S.G. 1974. Formation Damage or Limited Perforating Penetration? Test-Well Shooting May Give a Clue. J Pet Technol 26 (09): 979-984. SPE-4794-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4794-PA.
Withjack, E.M., Devier, C., and Michael, G. 2003. The Role of X-Ray Computed Tomography in Core Analysis. Presented at SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific Section Joint Meeting, Long Beach, California, USA, 19-24 May. SPE-83467-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/83467-MS.
World Oil. 2012. Halliburton Advances Perforating Technology with Opening of New Flow Laboratory. https://www.worldoil.com/news/2012/10/8/halliburton-advances-perforating-technology-with-opening-of-new-flow-laboratory (accessed 2 January 2019).