Coreflood Model Optimization Workflow for ASP Pilot Design Risk Analysis
- Olga Borozdina (Beicip-Franlab) | Magnolia Mamaghani (Beicip-Franlab) | Romain Barsalou (Beicip-Franlab) | Martin Lantoine (Beicip-Franlab) | Agnes Pain (Beicip-Franlab)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 18-21 March, Manama, Bahrain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.3.6 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 7 Management and Information, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 2 Well completion, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow
- uncertainties, EOR, coreflood, risk analysis, simulation
- 14 in the last 30 days
- 65 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
This work presents a new workflow to obtain a better-constrained reservoir-scale model for an Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) injection pilot design. It is explained how the impact of uncertain parameters related to ASP flooding can be quantified, using calibrated core-scale simulation based on experimental results, and how the influential parameters range for future reservoir-scale simulation can be determined. Computational costs of core-scale model are therefore much lower, and the final reservoir model is better constrained.
ASP flooding feasibility implies core scale studies, where chemical formulations are validated in the laboratory under field conditions. In the objective of the pilot designing, a numerical model is constructed and calibrated to history-match the core flood sequences: Remaining Oil Saturation (ROS), surfactant-polymer (SP) and polymer-alkaline (PA) injection and eventually the chase water slug. In order to quantify the impact of ASP chemical parameters on the history match, the Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) was performed using Response Surface Modeling (RSM). To obtain the acceptable range of influential parameters for future reservoir-scale simulation, the Bayesian optimization is used.
Applying this methodology on a real reservoir core, the laboratory measurements are accurately reproduced. Nevertheless, once the core-scale model was matched, the transition to reservoir-scale model must be done. Due to a large number of parameters and their associated uncertainties, this transition is not straight-forward. Thus, an additional step in our workflow is included. A new methodology is applied to firstly quantify the impact of uncertain parameters related to ASP flooding (adsorption of surfactant on the rock, critical micellar concentration, water mobility reduction by polymer etc.). To do so, the RSM is used and influential parameters are identified. In this study, the surfactant adsorption coefficients are the most influential parameters while others related to SPA have a poor impact on experiment results matching. Secondly, the acceptable range of influential parameters for future reservoir-scale simulation and feasibility study is obtained during Bayesian optimization. Thus, instead of using a wide (prior) range of uncertain parameters values, refined (posterior) distribution laws can be used for future reservoir model.
While the classical approach consists in matching experimental results to obtain calibrated values of certain properties (that are then entered in the reservoir model) and finally determine the influential parameters at the reservoir scale, here the choice was made to determine influential parameters and characterize their impacts at the core scale. This step helps to better constrain the reservoir model. Ongoing work is using the results of this workflow for pilot design and risk analysis.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Becerra, G. G., Modenesi, A., & Lisboa, E. A. (2012, January 1). Uncertainty History Matching and Forecasting, a Field Case Application. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/153176-MS
Bourbiaux, B., Fourno, A., Nguyen, Q.-L., Norrant, F., Robin, M., and Rosenberg, E. 2015. Experimental and numerical assessment of chemical enhanced oil recovery in oil-wet naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE J. 21 (3). SPE-169140-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169140-PA.
Busby, D. and Feraille M., 2008. Adaptive design of experiments for calibration of complex simulators – An application to uncertainty quantification of a mature oil field. 6th International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering: Theory and Practice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 135 012026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/135/1/012026.
Delamaide, E. (2014, September 24). Polymer Flooding of Heavy Oil - From Screening to Full-Field Extension. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/171105-MS
Demin, W., Zhenhua, Z., Jiecheng, C., Jingchun, Y., Shutang, G., and Li, L. 1997. Pilot Test of Alkaline Surfactant Polymer Flooding in Daqing Oil Field. SPE Res. Engin. 12 (4):229–233, SPE 36748-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36748-PA.
Douarche, F., Rousseau, D., Bazin, B., ., 2013. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 67 (2012), No. 6, pp. 983–997. DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2012059
Douarche, F., Da Veiga, S., Feraille, M., , 2014. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 69 (2014), No. 4, pp. 603–617. DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2013166
Feraille, M. and Marrel, A. 2012. Prediction under Uncertainty on a Mature Field. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 67 (2012), No. 2, pp. 193–206, DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2011172
Figuera, L. A., Khan Torres, K. A., Guaiquirian, L., Quijada, D., & Maestracci, W. J. (2007, January 1). EOR Evaluation Method for Highly Heterogeneous and Complex Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/107177-MS.
Hou, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Yue, X., and Yang, J. 2005. The role of viscoelasticity of alkali/surfactant/polymer solutions in enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 47 (3-4):219–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.04.001.
Leray, S., Douarche, F., Tabary, R., Peysson, Y., Moreau, P., and Preux, C. 2016. Multi-objective assisted inversion of chemical EOR corefloods for improving the predictive capacity of numerical models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 146:1101–1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.08.015.
Oakley J. and O'Hagan A., 2002. Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution, Biometrika 89, 4, 769–784, DOI:10.1093/biomet/89.4.769.
Schaaf, T., Coureaud, B., Labat, N., & Busby, D. (2009, October 1). Using Experimental Designs, Assisted History-Matching Tools, and Bayesian Framework To Get Probabilistic Gas-Storage Pressure Forecasts. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/113498-PA
Vargo, J., Turner, J., Bob, V., Pitts, M.J., Wyatt, K., Surkalo, H., and Patterson, D. 2000. Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flooding of the Cambridge Minnelusa Field. SPE Res. Eval. & Engin. 3 (6):552–558, SPE-68285-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/68285-PA.
Welch W., Buck R., Sacks J., Wynn H., Mitchell T., Morris M., 1992. Screening, predicting, and computer experiments, Technometrics 34, 1, 15–25, DOI: 10.2307/1269548.
Zerpa, L.E., Queipo, N.V., Pintos, S., and Salager, J.L. 2005. An optimization methodology of alkaline–surfactant–polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 47 (3-4):197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.03.002
Zubarev, D. I. (2009, January 1). Pros and Cons of Applying Proxy-models as a Substitute for Full Reservoir Simulations. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/124815-MS