An Eagle Ford Case Study: Improving an Infill Well Completion Through Optimized Refracturing Treatment of the Offset Parent Wells
- Mary Garza (Noble Energy) | Joshua Baumbach (Noble Energy) | James Prosser (Noble Energy) | Spencer Pettigrew (Noble Energy) | Kirsten Elvig (Noble Energy)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 3 Production and Well Operations, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.1 Completion Selection and Design, 7 Management and Information, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 2.1 Completion Selection and Design, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 2.5.5 Re-fracturing, 2 Well completion
- Diversion, Eagle Ford, Infill, Completions, Refracturing
- 215 in the last 30 days
- 891 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
This case study reviews Noble Energy's completion design, execution, and results of an Eagle Ford infill well B3 and the refracturing (refrac) treatments pumped on the direct offsets referred to in this paper as wells A1 and A2. The refrac stimulations were planned to serve the joint purpose of frac hit protection of the existing parent wells' reserves and re-pressurization of depleted zones to improve the performance of the infill child well. Both chemical diversion and mechanical diversion pods were utilized on the bullhead style refrac to optimize lateral placement of fracturing fluid and proppant.
The A1 refrac was pumped first with a larger job size of proppant, water, and diversion material. The A2 refrac, pumped second, was half the size of the A1. Instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) and diversion pressure response data was captured at each stage for both wells. Infill well B3 was completed last with normal plug-and-perf operations and the optimum job size of the time. The child well B3 production will be compared to offset wells with no depletion risk as well as to a 2014 vintage infill (Y3) well that was completed with no refrac on the direct offsets (X1 and X2).
The A1 refrac data showed a gradual trend of increasing ISIP and treating pressure throughout the job indicating a more uniform stimulation of the lateral. There is a sustained production uplift resulting in a 36% improvement in estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). The A2 refrac data showed anomalous ISIP and pressure spikes mid-way through the job indicating the stimulation was not accessing the entire lateral. This blockage downhole was caused by being too aggressive with the concentration of pods pumped per stage. Since the A2 was not effectively re-pressurized, there was negligible change to EUR when the well was returned to production. In comparing the two refracs, we concluded that a larger job (increased proppant, fluid, and diversion) with less concentrated but more frequent diversion drops will increase lateral coverage and more effectively protect the parent well reserves.
The surface treating pressures of the infill B3 indicate new rock was stimulated and initial production results trend with offset well production of the area showing no impact from depletion. Contrasting this with the prior infill Y3 completed with no refracs on parent wells, the Y3 has lower initial production (IP) rates and EUR when compared to its offset wells showing an obvious impact from depletion. Additionally, the refrac'd parent well A1 saw an improvement in EUR while the non-refrac'd parent X1 saw EUR degradation. In conclusion, pumping optimized refracs on the offset parent wells will both protect parent well reserves and improve the performance of the child well.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Diakhate, M., Gazawi, A., Barree, R.D.. 2015. Refracturing on Horizontal Wells in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas - One Operator's Perspective. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, 3-5 February. SPE-173333-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173333-MS
King, G. E., Rainbolt, M.F., & Swanson, C. 2017. Frac Hit Induced Production Losses: Evaluating Root Causes, Damage Location, Possible Prevention Methods and Success of Remedial Treatments. Presented at the SPE Annual Technology Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, 9-11 October. SPE-187192-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187192-MS
Van Domelen, M. S. 2017. A Practical Guide to Modern Diversion Technology. Presented at the SPE Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Symposium, Oklahoma City, 27-31 March. SPE-185120-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185120-MS