Real Time Analysis of Formation Face Pressures in Acid Fracturing Treatments
- Vibhas J. Pandey (ConocoPhillips Company, Houston) | Robert C. Burton (ConocoPhillips Company, Houston) | Kay Capps (CAPSHER TECHNOLOGY, College Station)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 2.6 Acidizing, 2 Well completion, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing
- Real Time Monitoring, Acid Fracturing, Soft Chalk Stimulation, Formation Face Pressure, Fracture Pressure Diagnostics
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 529 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Knowledge of fracture entry pressures or the formation face pressures during Acid Fracturing treatments can help in evaluating the effectiveness of the stimulation treatment in dynamic mode and can also enable and improve real-time decisions during the execution of treatment. In this paper, details of the methods and tools employed to generate formation face pressures in real-time mode with the help of live bottomhole pressure data, is discussed in detail.
The majority of the horizontal wells considered for this study were drilled and completed in the North Sea with permanent bottomhole pressure gauges that enabled constant monitoring of well pressures. The tool in discussion uses the combination of treatment data such as surface pressure, fluid density, injection rates, type of fluid, wellbore description, gauge depth, and wellbore deviation, along with bottomhole pressures to generate formation face pressures just outside the casing at active perforation depth. The tool carries out the calculations as the treatment is being pumped thus providing a dynamic array of several important parameters and can also evaluate the treatment after it has been executed.
Acid fracturing treatments combine the basic principles of hydraulic fracturing and acid reaction kinetics to stimulate acid soluble formations. It is customary to start the treatment with a high viscosity pad to generate a fracture geometry and follow it up with acid to react with the walls of the fracture and etch it differentially. The non-uniform etching action of the acid creates an uneven surface on fracture walls that provides the requisite fracture conductivity which is key to enhancing the well performance. The effectiveness of a treatment schedule can be ascertained by determining and analyzing the pressure behavior during the injection process. Several acid fracture treatments were analyzed using the tool and led to important conclusions related to fracture propagation modes, acid exposure times and effectiveness of given acid types. The results had a direct influence on modification of treatment designs and pump schedules to optimize treatment outcomes.
The knowledge of formation face pressures is critical to the success of hydraulic fracturing treatments, especially in multi-stage and multiple perforation cluster type horizontal well completions. The tool developed in the study helps generate information that predicts pressures at fracture entry in real-time mode.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||28|
Ayoub, J.A.,Brown, J.E.,Barree, R.D. and Elphick, J.J., 1992. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Fracturing Treatments. SPE Production Engineering. 7 (01). 39-46. SPE-20581-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20581-PA.
Anderson, R.A.,Ingram, D.S.,Zanier, A.M. 1973. Determining Fracture Pressure Gradients From Well Logs. J. Pet Technol 25 (11), 1259 - 1268. SPE-4135-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4135-PA.
Barree, R.D. and Mukherjee, H. 1996. Determination of Pressure Dependent Leakoff and Its Effect on Fracture Geometry. Presented at The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA. 6-9 October. SPE-36424-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36424-MS.
Ben-Naceur, K. and Economides, M. J. 1989. Design and Evaluation of Acid Fracturing Treatments. Presented at The Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA. 6 - 8 March. SPE-18978-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/18978-MS.
Brown, G. 2002. The History of the Darcy-Weisbach Equation for Pipe Flow Resistance. Proc. Environ. Water Resour. Hist.. 38. 10.1061/40650(2003)4.
Carter, R. D. 1957. Derivation of the General Equation for Estimating the Extent of the Fractured Area. Appendix I of "Optimum Fluid Characteristics for Fracture Extension". Drilling and Production Practice, G. C. Howard and C. R. Fast, New York, New York, USA. American Petroleum Institute. 261-269.
Fredrickson, S.E. 1986. Stimulating Carbonate Formations Using a Closed Fracture Acidizing Technique. SPE East Texas Regional Meeting, Tyler, Texas, USA. 21 - 22 April. SPE-14654-MS. https://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28552-MS.
Gdanski, R.D., and Lee, W. S. 1989. On the Design of Fracture Acidizing Treatments. Presented at The SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 13 - 14 March. SPE-18885-MS. 10.1061/40650(2003)https://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18885-MS.
Geerstma, J. and de Klerk, F. 1969. A Rapid Method of Predicting Width and Extent of Hydraulic Induced Fractures. J. Pet Technol 21 (12), 1571 - 1581. SPE-2458-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2458-PA.
Haaland, SE (1983). Simple and Explicit Formulas for the Friction Factor in Turbulent Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 105 (1): 89-90. doi:10.1115/1.3240948.
Harrington, L. and Hannah, R. R. 1975. Fracturing Design Using Perfect Support Fluids for Selected Fracture Proppan Concentrations in Vertical Fractures. Presented at The Fall Meeting of the SPE of AIME, Dallas, Texas, USA. 28 September to 1 October. SPE-5642-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5642-MS.
Harris, O. E., Hendrickson, A. R. and Coulter, A. W. 1966. High Concentration Acid Aids Stimulation Results in Carbonate Formations. J Pet Technol. 18 (10), 1291 - 1296. October 1966. SPE-1654-PA. https://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1654-PA
Kalfayan, L. J. 2007. Fracture Acidizing: History, Present State, and Future. Presented at The SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, USA. 29-31 January. SPE-106371-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/106371-MS.
Keck, R.G.,Nehmer, W.L. and Strumolo, G.S. 1992. A New Method for Predicting Friction Pressures and Rheology of Proppant-Laden Fracturing Fluids. SPE Production Engineering.7(01). 21-28. SPE-19771-PA. http://doi.dx.org/10.2118/19771-PA.
Lacy, L.L.,Rickards, A.R. and Ali, S.A. 1997. Embedment and Fracture Conductivity in Soft Formations Associated with HEC, Borate and Water-Based Fracture Designs. Presented at The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas. USA. 5-8 October. SPE-38590-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38590-MS.
Lacy, L.L.,Rickards, A.R. and Bilden, D.M. 1998. Fracture Width and Embedment Testing in Soft Reservoir Sandstone. SPE Drilling & Completions. 13 (01). 25-29. SPE-36421-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36421-MS.
Lagrone, K.W. and Rasmussen, J.W. 1963. A New Development in Completion Methods- The Limited Entry Technique. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 15 (07). 695 - 702. SPE-530-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/530-PA.
Long, G. and Xu, G. 2017. The Effects of Perforation Erosion on Practical Hydraulic-Fracturing Applications. SPE Journal. 22(02). 645-659. SPE-185173-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/185173-PA.
Nolte, K.G. and Smith, M.B. 1981. Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures. Journal of Pet. Technol. 33 (09). 1767-1775. SPE-8297-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8297-PA.
Nolte, K.G. 1986. A General Analysis of Fracturing Pressure Decline With Application to Three Models. SPE Formation Evaluation. 1 (06). 571-583. SPE-12941-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12941-PA.
Nolte, K.G. 1988b. Fluid Flow Considerations in Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at The SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia. 1-4 November. SPE-18537-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18537-MS.
Nolte, K.G.,Mack, M.G, and Lie, W.L. 1993. A Systematic Method for Applying Fracturing Pressure Decline: Part I. Presented at The Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA. 26-28 April. SPE-25845-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25845-MS.
Pandey, V. J., and Agreda, A. J. 2010: New Fracture-Stimulation Designs and Completion Techniques Result In Better Performance of Shallow Chittim Ranch Wells. SPE Production and Operations 29 (04): 288-309. SPE-147389-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147389-PAagred
Perkins, T.K. and Kern, L.R. 1961. Widths of Hydraulic Fractures. Journal of Pet. Technol. 13 (09). 937-949. SPE-89-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89-PA.
Pournik, M., Nasr-El Din, H. A., and Mahmoud, M.A. 2011. A Novel Application of Closed-Fracture Acidizing. SPE Prod. & Operations.26 (01). February 2011. 18 - 29. SPE-124874-PA. https://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124874-PA.
Terracina, J.M.,Turner, J.M.,Collins, D.H. and Spillars, S. 2010. Proppant Selection and Its Effect on the Results of Fracturing Treatments Performed in Shale Formations. Presented at The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy. 19-22 September. SPE-135502-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/135502-MS.
Wiprut, D.J. and Zoback, M.D. 1998. High Horizontal Stress in the Visund Field, Norwegian North Sea: Consequences For Borehole Stability and Sand Production. Presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway. 8-10 July. SPE-47244-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/47244-MS.