Comprehensive Multi-Stage Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage SAGD
- Zeinab Zargar (University of Calgary) | S. M. Farouq Ali (University of Houston)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 September, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 1.6 Drilling Operations
- Analytical Modelling, Thermal Recovery, Heat and Mass Balances, Steam Chamber, Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 190 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
A comprehensive analytical model of the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process is developed, encompassing steam chamber rise, sideways expansion, and the confinement phases. Results are validated using experimental and field data.
A new analytical model for predicting steam chamber rise velocity and oil production rate during this period is developed. In this theory, by combining volumetric oil displacement with Darcy oil rate considering the indirect frontal instability effect, the rise velocity, and the steam chamber height are calculated. The model is extended to predict oil production, heat or steam injection rate, heat consumption and Cumulative Steam-Oil Ratio (CSOR) during this phase. The model results show the CSOR decreases, with an increasing oil production rate. The rise velocity increases with an increase in permeability and temperature. Results are validated with experimental and field data.
The sideways steam chamber expansion is treated by a new analytical approach which is called Constant Volumetric Displacement (CVD) where injection rate must be increased continuously for a constant oil rate. At the final stage, adjacent chambers interfere, reducing the effective head for gravity drainage and the heat requirement in this system. For a small well spacing, confinement occurs earlier, heat loss starts decreasing sooner, resulting in a lower CSOR, than for a large spacing.
The above analytical SAGD models including rise, lateral spreading, and confinement phases are combined to obtain the Comprehensive Constant Volumetric Displacement (CCVD) model. The results are validated against experimental and field data. Excellent agreement was obtained with laboratory and field results.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||28|
Azad, A., and Chalaturnyk, R.J. 2012. An Improved SAGD Analytical Simulator: Circular Steam Chamber Geometry (in English). Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 82-83: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.003.
Birrell, G., and Putnam, P. 2000. A Study of the Influence of Reservoir Architecture on SAGD Steam Chamber Development at the Underground Test Facility, Northeastern Alberta, Canada, Using a Graphical Analysis of Temperature Profiles. Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 4-8 June PETSOC-2000-104. https://doi.org/10.2118/2000-104.
Butler, R. 1985. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 24 (03): 42–51. PETSOC-85-03-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01.
Butler, R. 1987. Rise of Interfering Steam Chambers. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 26 (03). PETSOC-87-03-07. https://doi.org/10.2118/87-03-07.
Butler, R.M., McNab, G.S., and Lo, H.Y. 1981. Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil during In-Situ Steam Heating. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59 (4): 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407.
Butler, R.M., and Stephens, D.J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells (in English). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 20 (2): 90–96. PETSOC-81-02-07. https://doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Cenovus Energy. 2012-2013. Cenovus Christina Lake In-Situ Oil Sands scheme 8591 - Performance Presentation Report Available at www.aer.ca.
Cenovus Energy. 2015. Cenovus Christina Lake In-Situ Oil Sands Scheme 8591 - Performance Presentation Report Available at www.aer.ca.
Chung, K.H., and Butler, R.M. 1987. Geometrical Effect Of Steam Injection On The Formation Of Emulsions In The Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. Presented at the, 1987/1/1/. PETSOC-88-01-02. https://doi.org/10.2118/88-01-02.
Closmann, P.J., and Smith, R.A. 1983. Temperature Observations and Steam-Zone Rise in the Vicinity of a Steam-Heated Fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 23 (04): 575–586. SPE-9898-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9898-PA.
ConocoPhillips Canada. 2007. Surmont Pilot Performance and Resource Management Presentation to the EUB - Technical Presentation Available at www.aer.ca.
ConocoPhillips Canada. 2015. Athabasca ConocoPhillips Surmont SAGD 9426, 11596, and 9460 - Performance Presentation Available at www.aer.ca.
Dehghanpour, H., Murtaza, M., and He, Z. 2013. Modeling Three-Phase Flow during Steam Chamber Rise-Impact of Water Drainage on Oil Production Rate. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, Calgary, Alberta, 11-13 June. SPE-165426-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165426-MS.
Edmunds, N., Kovalsky, J., Gittins, S.. 1994. Review of Phase A Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage Test. SPE Reservoir Engineering 9 (02): 119–124. SPE-21529-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/21529-PA.
Gotawala, D.R., and Gates, I.D. 2008. Steam Fingering at the Edge of a Steam Chamber in a Heavy Oil Reservoir. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 86 (6): 1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20117.
Ito, Y., Hirata, T., and Ichikawa, M. 2001. The Growth of the Steam Chamber during the Early Period of the UTF Phase B and Hangingstone Phase I Projects. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 40 (09). PETSOC-01-09-02. https://doi.org/10.2118/01-09-02.
Reis, J.C. 1992. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Linear Geometry. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 31 (10). PETSOC-92-10-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/92-10-01.
Reis, J.C. 1993. A Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Radial Geometry. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 32 (08). PETSOC-93-08-05. https://doi.org/10.2118/93-08-05.
Sasaki, K., Satoshi, A., Yazawa, N.. 2002. Microscopic Visualization with High Resolution Optical-Fiber Scope at Steam Chamber Interface on Initial Stage of SAGD Process. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma 13-17 April. SPE-75241-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/75241-MS.
Zargar, Z., and Farouq Ali, S.M. 2017. Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Old and New. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. SPE-180748-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/180748-PA.
Zargar, Z., and Farouq Ali, S.M. 2018. Effect of Confinement and Well Interference on SAGD Performance - An Analytical Assessment. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 13-14 March. SPE-189715-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189715-MS.