First Proppant Designed to Decrease Water Production
- John Green (Hexion) | Andreina Dewendt (Hexion) | John Terracina (Hexion) | Benjamin Abrams (Hexion) | Adam Harper (Hexion)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 September, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2 Well completion, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing
- Proppant, Warer Control, Formation Water, Completion, Produced Water
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 314 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
This paper discusses research on how proppant selection affects fracturing treatment results in shale formations that produce high water volumes. Fracturing treatments, formation characteristics, proppant types, and post fracture treatment production results are examined in detail. A production case study that focuses on the impact of proppant selection in wells completed in formations that produce hydrocarbons with a high water cut will also be presented.
This paper analyzes laboratory tests that were performed to measure the water and oil flow rates of various commonly used proppants. A case study on how Decreased Water Flow Proppant (DWFP) performed in the Granite Wash in the Texas panhandle is also highlighted. Post fracture treatment production results are compared to traditional proppants used in direct offset wells.
Laboratory testing showed DWFP had much lower water flow and higher oil flow through the proppant pack compared to traditional proppants. The results of the laboratory tests will be used to explain and support the production case study. The field case study proves that DWFP reduced formation water production, while increasing hydrocarbon production compared to traditional proppants used in offset wells. This innovative proppant appears to decrease the relative permeability to water in the proppant pack, resulting in lower water production and higher hydrocarbon production compared to conventional proppants.
This paper introduces the first proppant specifically designed for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs. A new laboratory test method of measuring water flow rate through a proppant pack was specifically developed for this type of proppant. The proppant’s wettability is introduced as a new proppant selection factor for fracturing treatments in high water cut reservoirs.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Dunn-Norman, S., Hufford, W., Almond, S. W. 2018. A Summary of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Multiyear Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/189873-MS.
Greaves, R., Hartstein, R., Lincicome, D., Beck, P., Boothe, M., and Olson, K. 2017. Fresh Water Neutral: Managing Water Use and Giving Back to the Environment. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/187123-MS.
Jacobs, T. 2016. More Oil, More Water: How Produced Water Will Create Big Cost Problems for Shale Operators. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/1216-0034-JPT.
Parshall, J., Whitfield, S., and Jacobs, T. 2017. E&P Notes. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/0517-0022-JPT. Nanotechnology Could See Big Future in Water Cleanup.
Terracina, J. M., Turner, J.M., Collins, D.H., and Spillars, S. 2010. Proppant Selection and Its Effect on the Results of Fracturing Treatments Performed in Shale Formations. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/135502-MS.
Watts, R., 2013. A Day in the Life of a Barrel of Water: Evaluating Total Life Cycle Costs of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/166113-MS.
Wilson, A. 2017. Breakthrough Polymer Water-Shutoff System Shows Promise for Carbonate Ghawar Field. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/1217-0078-JPT.