Simulation of Squeeze Treatment/Tracer Programme Designs
- Oscar Vazquez (Heriot-Watt University) | Ilias Giannakouras (Heriot-Watt University) | Eric Mackay (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference and Exhibition, 20-21 June, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5.6.5 Tracers, 3 Production and Well Operations, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 3 Production and Well Operations, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 3.3 Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow
- Squeeze Treatment, Placement, Tracer
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 101 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
One of the biggest challenges in designing squeeze treatments is ensuring appropriate chemical placement along the completion interval. Generally, the chemical slug is bull-headed; therefore, in long horizontal wells and/or crossflow wells, exposing the chemical to all the completion intervals might be difficult. In this paper we introduce a method to evaluate placement efficiency. If placement is inadequate, some sections of the well will be unprotected, resulting in an undesirable situation: the well may appear to be protected because the inhibitor return concentrations measured at surface are above the threshold, but there is a loss of production due to scale deposition in areas of the well not contacted by chemical. In these circumstances inhibitor placement can be accurately determined by production logging, but this can be prohibitively expensive. An alternative is to use tracers to evaluate the layer flow rate distribution, and therefore quantify chemical placement. The objective of this paper is to determine if a tracer package could be deployed as part of a squeeze treatment in challenging wells, in particular in the overflush stage. If there are zones in the wellbore at different pressures, then producing the tracer back in steps at different rates will result in the tracer return concentration profile having characteristic features that can be interpreted to estimate chemical placement.
Two three layer cases with crossflow are considered. In both cases, a tracer package was included in the overflush, and the resulting return profiles showed clearly the desired features. The main advantage of this approach is that there is no significant increase in the operational expense. The only additional expense will be the cost of the specific tracer and the subsequent analysis. It is envisaged that the cost is less than 5% of the total squeeze treatment cost. The results of this novel multi-rate post squeeze production stage following injection of tracer demonstrate the feasibility of including such a tracer package in a squeeze treatment. Data collected may then be used to optimise the design of subsequent treatments, to ensure that appropriate placement is achieved by rate control or by diversion, if necessary.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Adams, M. C.. (1992) ‘Thermal stabilities of aromatic acids as geothermal tracers’, Geothermics, 21(3), pp. 323–339. doi: 10.1016/0375-6505(92)90085-N.
Agenet, N., Moradi-Tehrani, N. and Tillement, O. (2013) ‘Fluorescent Nanobeads: A New Generation of Easily Detectable Water Tracers’, in International Petroleum Technology Conference. doi: 10.2523/15312-MS.
Huseby, O.. (2005) ‘Use of natural geochemical tracers to improve reservoir simulation models’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 48(3-4), pp. 241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.002.
Huseby, O.. (2008) ‘Improved Understanding of Reservoir Fluid Dynamics in the North Sea Snorre Field by Combining Tracers, 4D Seismic, and Production Data’, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11(4), pp. 15–17. doi: 10.2118/105288-MS.
Huseby, O.. (2010) ‘Natural and Conventional Tracers for Improving Reservoir Models Using the EnKF Approach’, SPE Journal, 15(4), pp. 1–15. doi: 10.2118/121190-PA.
Huseby, O.. (2015) ‘Assessing EOR Potential from Partitioning Tracer Data’, in SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference. doi: 10.2118/172808-MS.
Liang, J.-T., Lee, R. L. and Seright, R. S. (1993) ‘Gel Placement in Production Wells With Water-Coning Problems’, SPE Production & Facilities, 8(3), pp. 243–272. doi: 10.2118/20211-PA.
Mackay, E. J.. (2003) ‘Squeeze Modelling: Treatment Design and Case Histories’, 5Th Spe Europe. Formation Damage Conf. (the Hague, Netherlands, 5/13-14/2003) Proc., (200333). doi: 10.2118/82227-MS.
Pritchett, J.. (2003) ‘Field Application of a New In-Depth Waterflood Conformance Improvement Tool’, SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific. doi: 10.2118/84897-MS.
Sanni, M. L.. (2015) ‘A Field Case Study of Inter-well Chemical Tracer Test’, in SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, pp. 13–15. doi: 10.2118/173760-MS.
Seccombe, J.. (2010) ‘Demonstration of Low-Salinity EOR at Interwell Scale, Endicott Field, Alaska’, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 2008. doi: 10.2118/129692-MS.
Seright, R. S. (1988) ‘Placement of gels to modify injection profiles’, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, pp. 4–6. doi: 10.2118/17332-MS.
Seright, R. S. (1990) ‘Impact of Dispersion on Gel Placement for Profile Control’, Spe Permian Basin & Trans-Pecos Sect Oil & Gas Recovery Conf (Midland, Texas, 3/8-9/90) Proc, (199017), pp. 345–356. doi: 10.2118/20127-PA.
Seright, R. S. (1991) ‘Effect of rheology on gel placement’, SPE Reservoir Engineering, 6(2), pp. 212–218. doi: 10.2118/18502-PA.
Serres-Piole, C.. (2012) ‘Water tracers in oilfield applications: Guidelines’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Elsevier, 98-99, pp. 22–39. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.08.009.
Sorbie, K. and Gdanski, R. (2005) ‘A Complete Theory of Scale-Inhibitor Transport and Adsorption/Desorption in Squeeze Treatments’, Proceedings of SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Scale. doi: 10.2523/95088-MS.
Vazquez, O., Mackay, E., . (2014) ‘Use of Tracers To Evaluate and Optimize Scale-Squeeze-Treatment Design in the Norne Field’, SPE Production & Operations, 29(1), pp. 5–13. doi: 10.2118/164114-PA.
Vazquez, O., Fursov, I. and Mackay, E. (2016) ‘Automatic optimization of oilfield scale inhibitor squeeze treatment designs’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147, pp. 302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.025.
Vazquez, O., Mackay, E. and Sorbie, K. (2012) ‘A two-phase near-wellbore simulator to model non-aqueous scale inhibitor squeeze treatments’, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 82–83. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.030.