Evaluation of Fe(II)/Fe(III) Effect on Barite Scale Inhibitors Under Different Temperatures
- H. Dushanee | M. Sriyarathne | Zhang Zhang | Gedeng Ruan | Khadouja Harouaka | Wei Li | Alex Yi-Tsung Lu | Guannan Deng | Xin Wang | Yue Zhao | Amy T Kan | Mason Tomson
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference and Exhibition, 20-21 June, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale
- inhibitors, Scale, Fe(II), Barite
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 118 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
This paper discusses research on performance of scale inhibitors in the presence of ferrous ion. Iron ion is the most abundant heavy metal ion in wastewater and oilfield produced water. Fe(II) is the dominant form of iron ion in oil and gas wells due to the downhole high anoxic conditions. Fe(II) can form FeS and FeCO3 which will cause severe problems in production. Further, it is important to thoroughly investigate the inhibitor compatibility with these cations in oilfield as the existence of iron in solution effects on inhibitor chemistry.
In this research, Fe(II) effect on various scale inhibitors on barite was tested using an improved anoxic testing apparatus along with laser light scattering nucleation detection method. In this newly designed apparatus strict maintenance of anoxic condition is guaranteed by constant argon flow and switch valve to transfer solution. Moreover, the high Fe(II) tolerance concentration for common inhibitors were tested by varying Fe(II) concentrations from 50-100 mg/L at 90°C and near neutral pH conditions. Most scale inhibitors show good Fe(II) tolerance at experimental conditions, while the inhibition performance of phosphonates were significantly impaired by Fe(II). It is proposed that the formation of insoluble precipitates between Fe(II) and phosphonate is very likely the reason behind the observed significant impairment. Further, two methods to reverse the detrimental effect of Fe(II) on barite scale inhibitor performance is investigated and discussed here. First, a most common organic chelating agents used in oilfield, EDTA, was tested for its ability to reverse the detrimental effect of Fe(II) on scale. Secondly, Fe(II)/Inhibitor concentration ratio was changed so that remaining inhibitor in the aqueous phase would conduct the scale inhibition.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Chandrasekhar, V., Senapati, T., and Dey, A. 2011. Molecular Transition-Metal Phosphonates. Dalton Trans 40(20): 5394–5418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0DT01069C.
Coleman J., Graham, G.M., and Dyer, S.J.. 1999. Iron Release Following Scale Inhibitor Application and Mineral Dissolution in a North Alsakan Reservoir-Some Field Implications. Presented at SPE Oilfield Scale Conference https://doi.org/10.2118/58727-MS.
Ewing, B. C., Pabley, A. S., and Callaway, R. E. 1983. A Synergistic Chelation System for Acidizing in the Presence of High Iron Concentrations. Presented at SPE Oilfield and Geothermal Chemistry Symposium, Denver, Colorado, 1-3June. https://doi.org/10.2118/11795-MS.
Hall, B. E. and Dill, W. R. 1988. Iron Control Additives for Limestone and Sandstone Acidizing of Sweet and Sour Wells. Presented at SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Bakersfield, California, 8-9 February. https://doi.org/10.2118/17157-MS.
Hill, P. I., Graham, G. M., Dyer, S. J., and Coleman, J. 2000. Iron Release Following Mineral Dissolution Following Scale Inhibitor Application In a North Alaskan Reservoir. Presented at SPE International Symposium on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 23-24 February. https://doi.org/10.2118/58727-MS.
Kelland, M. A. 2011. Effect of Various Cations on the Formation of Calcium Carbonate and Barium Sulfate Scale with and without Scale Inhibitors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50(9): 5852–5861. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2003494.
Shen, D., Shcolnik, D., and Perkins, R.. 2012. Evaluation of Scale Inhibitors in Marcellus High-Iron Waters. Oil and Gas Facilities 1(05): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.2118/141145-PA.
Shimizu, G. K. H., Vaidhyanathan, R., and Taylor, J. M. 2009. Phosphonate and Sulfonate Metal Organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev 38(5): 1430–1449. https://doi.org/10.1039/B802423P
Taylor, K. C. and Nasr-El-Din, H. A. 1999. A Systematic Study of Iron Control Chemicals - Part 2. Presented at SPE oilfield Chem int symp, Houston, 16-19 February. https://doi.org/10.2118/50772-MS.
Zhang, Z., Zhang, F., and Tomson, M. B. 2015. Ferrous iorn impact on phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors at temperature ranging from 25 to 70 C. presented at SPE international symposium on oilfield chemistry, Woodlands, Texas, USA, 13-15 April. https://doi.org/10.2118/173770-MS.
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., and Tomson, M. B. 2016. Impact of Fe(III)/Fe(II) on scale inhibition. Presented at SPE international oilfield scale conference and exhibition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 11-12 May. https://doi.org/10.2118/179905-MS.