Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

Simulation and Modeling of Pressure Difference on Steam Chamber and Production Performance

Authors
H. Xiong (University of Oklahoma) | S. Huang (China University of Petroleum-Beijing) | D. Devegowda (University of Oklahoma) | H. Liu (China University of Petroleum) | C. Kim (University of Oklahoma)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/190107-MS
Document ID
SPE-190107-MS
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Source
SPE Western Regional Meeting, 22-26 April, Garden Grove, California, USA
Publication Date
2018
Document Type
Conference Paper
Language
English
ISBN
978-1-61399-599-0
Copyright
2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Disciplines
5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery
Keywords
Steam Chamber, Thermal Recovery, Heavy Oil, Pressure Difference, SAGD
Downloads
6 in the last 30 days
114 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 8.50
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 25.00

Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is the most effective thermal recovery method to exploit oil sand. The driving force of gravity is generally acknowledged as the most significant driving mechanism in SAGD process. However, an increasing number of field cases have proven that pressure difference may even play an important role in some cases. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to simulate the effects of injector-producer pressure difference on steam chamber evolution and SAGD production performance.

A series of 2D numerical simulations are conducted on the basis of MacKay River and Dover reservoir in West Canada to investigate the influence of pressure difference. Meanwhile, the effects of pressure difference on oil production rate, stable production time, steam chamber development were studied in detail. Moreover, by combining Darcy's law and heat conduction along with a mass balance in the reservoir, a modified mathematical model considering the effects of pressure difference is established to predict the SAGD production performance. Finally, the proposed model is validated by comparing calculated cumulative oil production and oil production rate with the simulation results.

The results indicate that the oil production first increases rapidly and then slows down when a certain pressure difference is reached. The impacts of pressure difference are much greater at steam chamber rising stage than at steam chamber expansion stage. Therefore, in the field, at the beginning of the SAGD recovery, it is better to augment pressure difference, while at the steam expansion stage, a lower pressure difference is preferred, so that a smaller chance of steam breakthrough and a higher economic benefit will be achieved. Besides, it is found that steam chamber expansion angle is a function of pressure difference. Based on this phenomenon, a new mathematical model is established considering the modification of the expansion angle which Butler treated it as a constant. With the proposed model, production performance, such as cumulative oil production and oil production rate can be predicted. Steam chamber shape is redefined at the rising stage and it changes from fan-shape to hexagonal-shape, but not the single fan-shape defined by Butler. This shape-redefinition can clearly explain why the greatest oil production rate does not happen when steam chamber reaches the cap-rock.

Literature surveys show few studies on how pressure difference influences steam chamber development and SAGD recovery. This paper provides a modified SAGD production model and also a totally new scope for SAGD EOR, which makes the pressure difference a new optimizable factor in field.

File Size  3 MBNumber of Pages   20

Butler R. M,Stephens, D.J and Weiss, M. (1980). The vertical growth of steam chambers in the in-situ thermal recovery of heavy oils. Can. Chem. Eng. Conf 4:1152-1160.

Butler R. M and Stephens, D.J. (1981a). "The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells" Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 20(02): 90-96.

Butler R. M,Mcnab G S, Lo H Y. (1981b). Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil During In-Situ Steam Heating. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 59(4):455-460.

Butler R. M. (1985). A new approach to the modeling of steam assisted gravity drainage. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 24(03):42-51.

Butler R. M. (1987). "The rising of interfering steam chambers". Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 26(03): 70-75.

Butler R. M. (1998). SAGD Comes of AGE!. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 37(7):9-12.

Butler R. M. (2001). Some Recent Developments in SAGD. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 40(1):18-22

Chen Yuanqian. (2015). Question of SAGD production rate formula for Butler's double horizontal wells. Fault Block Oil & Gas Field 22(4):472-475.

Gomez H L, Babadagli T. (2017). High-Temperature Solvent Injection for Heavy-Oil Recovery from Oil Sands: Determination of Optimal Application Conditions Through Genetic Algorithm. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 20(02):372-382.

Huang Shijun, Xiong Hao, Wei S, . (2016). Physical simulation of the interlayer effect on SAGD production in MacKay river oil sands. Fuel 183:373-385.

Huang S, Liu H, Xue Y, . (2017a). Performance Prediction of Solvent Enhanced Steam Flooding for Recovery of Thin Heavy Oil Reservoirs. SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, 15-16 February, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Huang S,Hao X,Ma K,. (2017b). A mathematical model for productivity prediction of SAGD process considering non-uniform steam distribution. Journal of China University of Petroleum 41(04):107-115.

Keshava1rz M, Okuno R,Babadagli T. (2015). A semi-analytical solution to optimize single-component solvent coinjection with steam during SAGD. Fuel 144:400-414.

Adegbesan,K.O.. (1991). Performance of a Thermal Horizontal Well Pilot. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 6-9 October, Dallas, Texas

Kisman K E. (2013). Artificial Lift-A Major Unresolved Issue for SAGD. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 42(8):39-45.

Liu Zhibo, Cheng Linsong, Ji Youjun, Liu Qicheng. (2011). Production features of steam and gas push: Comparative analysis with steam assisted gravity drainage. Petroleum Exploration and Development 38(01): 79-83.

Liu H,Cheng L,Xiong H,. (2017a). Effects of Solvent Properties and Injection Strategies on Solvent-Enhanced Steam Flooding for Thin Heavy Oil Reservoirs with Semi-Analytical Approach. Oil & Gas Science & Technology 72(4):20-33.

Liu H,Cheng L,Li C,. (2017b). An Investigation into Temperature Distribution and Heat Loss Rate within the Steam Chamber in Expanding-Solvent SAGD Process. SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, 15-16 February, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Liu Hao, Cheng Linsong, Xiong Hao. (2016). The effects of injector-producer pres- sure difference on dual-well SAGD recovery. Petroleum Science Bulletin 1(03): 363-375

Ma Desheng, Guo Jia, Zan Cheng, . (2013). Physical simulation of improving the uniformity of steam chamber growth in the steam assisted gravity drainage. Petroleum exploration and development 40(2):188-193.

Mozaffari, S.;Nikookar, M.;Ehsani, M. R.;Sahranavard, L.;Roayaie, E.;Mohammadi, A. H. (2013). Numerical modeling of steam injection in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel 112:185-192.

Edmunds.N. (2000). Investigation of SAGD Steam Trap Control in Two and Three Dimensions. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 39(01):30-40.

Neil Edmunds. (1999). On the difficult birth of SAGD. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 38(1):14-15.

Reis J C. (1992). a Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Linear Geometry. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 31(10):14-20.

Roger Butler. (1991). Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen. Alberta: Prentice-Hall.

Farouq. AIi.S.M. (1997). Is There Life After SAGD? Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 36(06):20-24.

Teng L U, Zhao-Min L I, Sun X N, . (2014). Characterization of foam assisted SAGD process. Journal of China University of Petroleum 38(3):93-98.

Wei S,Cheng L,Huang W,. (2014). Prediction for steam chamber development and production performance in SAGD process. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering 19(7):303-310.

Sun X G, Wan-Juna H E, Xiao-Bob H U, . (2012). Parameters Optimization of Different Production Stages by Dual-Horizontal Well SAGD Process for Super-Heavy Oil Reservoir. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology 33(6):697-699.

Xiong H,Huang S,Liu H,. (2017a). A Novel Optimization of SAGD to Enhance Oil Recovery - The Effects of Pressure Difference. IOR 2017, European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.

Xiong H,Huang S,Liu H,. (2017b). A Novel Model to Investigate the Effects of Injector-Producer Pressure Difference on SAGD for Bitumen Recovery. International Journal of Oil Gas & Coal Technology 16(3):217-235.

Yang Yang,Huang Shijun, Liu Yang, . (2016). A Multi-Stage Theoretical Model to Characterize the Liquid Level during Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. SPE Journal. SPE-183630-PA.

Ito,Y.Suzuki.S. (1999). Numerical Simulation of the SAGD Process in the Hangingstone Oil Sands Reservoir, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 38(09):27-35.

Yuan J Y, Nugent D. (2013). Subcool, Fluid Productivity, and Liquid Level Above a SAGD Producer. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 52(5):360-367.

You may also be interested in…

SPE

Influence of Pressure Difference Between Reservoir and Production Well on Steam-Chamber Propagation and Reservoir-Production Performance

Xiong, Hao, University of Oklahoma
Huang, Shijun, China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Devegowda, Deepak, University of Oklahoma
Liu, Hao, China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Li, Hao, University of Oklahoma
Padgett, Zack, Univiersity of Oklahoma
190107-PA SPE Journal Paper - 2019
View rights & permissions
  • Quick Abstract
  • Metrics

23 downloads in the last 30 days
23 downloads since 2007

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in