How to Plan a SAGD Project, If You Must…
- S. M. Farouq Ali (University of Houston) | Bita Byestehparvin (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Western Regional Meeting, 22-26 April, Garden Grove, California, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 7 Management and Information, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs
- Heavy Oil, Bitumen, Steam Injection, SAGD, Design
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 204 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is widely used in Alberta for recovering bitumen from oil (tar) sands. A variation of the same has had some success in heavy oils as well. It is a high-risk recovery method and requires careful planning and design. This paper outlines the success criteria for SAGD, and a design methodology.
First of all, applicability of other lower risk recovery processes, such as steamflood variants, is considered to determine if SAGD is a good choice. SAGD has been successful in oil sands of Alberta under rather restricted conditions. Geology is the most important factor, in particular vertical permeability, oil saturation, and initial mobility of water. Where the minimum criteria are not satisfied, there have been failures, discussed also. The author has developed new equations for the entire SAGD process, not just the stabilized oil flow regime, given previously, and has corrected the errors in the same. These are discussed in detail, with examples. The application of SAGD variations in conventional heavy oils is also considered.
The current experience in Alberta, and elsewhere, is described, and reasons for success/failure are outlined. Given that background, the desirability of SAGD vis-à-vis other thermal processes is discussed for California heavy oils. The variation of SAGD being employed in Saskatchewan heavy oils is also discussed, showing that it is not SAGD in the strict sense, rather a modified steamflood, using horizontal wells. It is concluded that SAGD has a high oil recovery potential if the right combination of rock-fluid properties is present. The application of SAGD to conventional heavy oils is equally problematic, in view of a very different mechanism.
The novelty of the paper lies in (1) a comprehensive treatment of SAGD, from the rising chamber to plateau to decline phases, (2) assessment of SAGD compared to other recovery methods for different types of reservoirs, and (3) application of SAGD variants to conventional heavy oils.
|File Size||575 KB||Number of Pages||5|