Well-Testing Challenges in Unconventional and Tight Gas Reservoirs
- Mehdi Azari (Halliburton) | Farrukh Hamza (Halliburton) | Hamid Hadibeik (Halliburton) | Sandeep Ramakrishna (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Western Regional Meeting, 22-26 April, Garden Grove, California, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics
- Well Testing, Tight Gas, pressure transient analysis, Injection-Falloff, Unconventional
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 479 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Traditionally, newly drilled wells are tested using a drillstem test (DST) or wireline formation test (WFT) to evaluate production potential and help make development and completion decisions. These methods are typically designed to flow the well under controlled conditions and then shut in the flow to achieve a pressure buildup (PBU). Depending on how it is conducted, testing could involve a typical DST, closedchamber DST, slug test, or surge test. Later, during the life of a well, other tests, such as standard drawdown-buildup, reservoir limit, flow-after-flow, interference, and pulse tests are conducted to evaluate productivity, remaining reserves, amount of damage, depletion, and production allocation.
Even though injection/falloff (IFO) is also an established testing type, it is not conducted as often as a standard pressure drawdown (PDD) and PBU test within the petroleum industry because of possible formation damage resulting from a noncompatible injection fluid. Such tests are usually conducted to determine injection efficiency for water injection wells, communication between an injection and a production well during a secondary oil recovery project, such as waterflooding, in mini- or microfracturing to determine formation and rock mechanics properties, and in nonproducing wells where a standard PDD and PBU test would not work.
Because of controlled rates with an IFO test in low-permeability wells, faster flow stabilization can be achieved, resulting in shorter wellbore-storage durations. This technique can obtain well and reservoir information faster than a conventional PBU test.
One issue with unconventional wells, particularly tight gas wells, is that the wellbore storage lasts significantly longer than in standard wells. A downhole shut-in tool or any test that minimizes the wellbore storage effects can greatly reduce the duration of such tests and help improve the quality of the analysis results. An extended diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT) conducted with a downhole wireline operation that minimizes high wellbore storage issues is also discussed.
This paper discusses several well-testing applications with corresponding analyses pertaining to unconventional wells. The results provided valuable information to help optimize production and evaluate reservoir potential.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Soliman, M. Y., Craig, D. P., Bartko, K. M.et al. 2005. Post-Closure Analysis to Determine Formation Permeability, Reservoir Pressure, Residual Fracture Properties. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain, 12-15 March. SPE-93419-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/93419-MS.
Sun, H., Chawathe, A., Hoteit, H.et al. 2015. Understanding Shale Gas Flow Behavior Using Numerical Simulation. SPE J. 20 (01): 142-154. SPE-167753-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/167753-PA.
US EIA. 2017. Annual Energy Outlook 2017 with projections to 2050. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf (accessed 25 January 2018).
Wang, H. 2017. What Factors Control Shale-Gas Production and Production-Decline Trend in Fractured Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation. SPE J. 22 (02): 562-581. SPE-179967-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/179967-PA.
Zhang, X., Du, C., Deimbacher, F.et al. 2009. Sensitivity Studies of Horizontal Wells with Hydraulic Fractures in Shale Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 7-9 December. IPTC-13338-MS. https://doi.org10.2523/IPTC-13338-MS.
Aguilera, R. 2008. Effect of Fracture Compressibility on Gas-in-Place Calculations of Stress-Sensitive Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15-17 May. SPE-100451-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/100451-PA.
Ambrose, R. J., Hartman, R. C., Diaz-Campos, M.et al. 2012. Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations. SPE J. 17 (01): 219-229. https://doi.org10.2118/131772-PA.
Azari, M., Burleson, J., Soliman, M. Y.et al. 1996. Testing and Evaluation of Tubing-Conveyed Extreme Overbalanced Perforating. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 23-25 October. SPE-37326-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/37326-MS.
Azari, M., Guoynes, J., Soliman, M. Y.et al. 1997. Deliverability Enhancement and Well testing of Two Gas Storage Fields in Mt. Simon Formation - Case History. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, 22-24 October. SPE-39208-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/39208-MS.
Azari, M., Asadi, M., Schultz, R.et al. 1999. Finite Element and Neural Network Modeling of Extreme Overbalance Perforating. Presented at the SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 28-31 March. SPE-52167-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/52167-MS.
Azari, M., Khan, W., Jambunathan, V.et al. 2016. Dynamic Reservoir from Microbuildups with Formation Tester. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, 26-28 September. SPE-181638-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/181638-MS.
Borges, U. and Jamiolahmady, M. 2009. Well Test Analysis in Tight Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8-11 June. SPE-121113-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/121113-MS.
China Daily. 2017. China's shale gas output jumps in 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-07/11/content_30065672.htm (accessed 25 January 2018).
Clarkson, C. R., Jensen, J. L., and Blasingame, T. 2011. Reservoir Engineering for Unconventional Reservoirs: What Do We Have to Consider? Presented at the North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 14-16 June. SPE-145080-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/145080-MS.
Dahi Taleghani, A. and Olson, J. E. 2013. How Natural Fractures Could Affect Hydraulic-Fracture Geometry. SPE J. 19 (01): 161-171. SPE-167608-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/167608-PA.
Garcia, J. P., Pooladi-Darvish, M., Brunner, F.et al. 2006. Well Testing of Tight Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15-17 May. SPE-100576-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/100576-MS.
Gulen, G., Ikonnikova, S., Browning, J.et al. 2014. Fayetteville Shale-Production Outlook. SPE Econ & Mgmt 7 (02): 47-59. SPE-173187-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/173187-PA.
Hackley, P. C. and Lewan, M. 2017. Understanding and distinguishing reflectance measurements of solid bitumen and vitrinite using hydrous pyrolysis: Implications to petroleum assessment. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org10.1306/08291717097.
Hall, H. N. 1953. Compressibility of Reservoir Rocks. J Pet Technol 5 (01): 17-19. SPE-953309-G. https://doi.org10.2118/953309-G.
Hamdi, H., Jamiolahmady, M., and Corbett, P. W. M. 2013. Modeling the Interfering Effects of Gas Condensate and Geological Heterogeneities on Transient Pressure Response. SPE J. 18 (04): 656-669. SPE-143613-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/143613-PA.
Hamza, F., Gu, M., Quirein, J.et al. 2016. Improved Characterization of Anisotropic Elastic Moduli and Stress for Unconventional Reservoirs Using Laboratory Mineralogy, TOC, Static, and Dynamic Geomechanical Data. Presented at the SPWLA 57th Annual Logging Symposium, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25-29 June. SPWLA-2016-AA.
Hamza, F., Chen, C., Gu, M.et al. 2015. Characterization of Anisotropic Elastic Moduli and Stress for Unconventional Reservoirs Using Laboratory Static and Dynamic Geomechanical Data. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 20-22 October. SPE-175907. https://doi.org10.2118/175907-MS.
Hashmi, G. M., Kabir, C. S., and Hasan, A. R. 2015. Design and Interpretation of Transient Tests at Well's Inception. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 28-30 September. SPE-175007-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/175007-MS.
Hashmi, G. M., Kabir, C. S., and Hasan, A. R. 2016. Design and interpretation of transient tests at well's inception. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 145: 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.035.
Holditch, S. A. 2006. Tight Gas Sands. J Pet Technol 58 (06): 86-93. SPE-103356-JPT. https://doi.org10.2118/103356-JPT.
Jahabani, A. and Aguilera, R. 2008. Well Testing of Tight Gas Reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 48 (10): 64-70. SPE-130066-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/130066-PA.
Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., and Unsworth, M. 2007. Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. J Can Pet Technol 46 (10). PETSOC-07-10-06. https://doi.org10.2118/07-10-06.
Jin, M., Zhang, W., and Zhang, H. 2013. Integrated Well Test Strategy in Unconventional Tight Gas Reservoirs - Learning and Experiences from an Actual Field Project. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, 26-28 March. IPTC-16950-Abstract. https://doi.org10.2523/IPTC-16950-Abstract.
Gale, J. F. W., Laubach, S. E., Olson, J. E.et al. 2014. Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations. AAPG Bulletin 98 (11): 2165-2216. https://doi.org/10.1306/08121413151.
Lan, Y., Moghanloo, R. G., and Davudov, D. 2017. Pore Compressibility of Shale Formations. SPE J. 22 (06): 1778-1789. SPE-185059-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/185059-PA.
Lee, W. J. 1987. Pressure-Transient Test Design in Tight Gas Formation. J Pet Technol 39 (10): 1185-1195. SPE-17088-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/17088-PA.
Nguyen, D. H. and Cramer, D. D. 2013. Diagnostic Fracture Injection Testing Tactics in Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 4-6 February. SPE-163863-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/163863-MS.
Olorode, O. M., Akkutlu, I. Y., and Efendiev, Y. 2017. Compositional Reservoir-Flow Simulation for Organic-Rich Gas Shale. SPE J. 22 (06): 1963-1983. SPE-182667-PA. https://doi.org10.2118/182667-PA.
Pankaj, P. and Kumar, V. 2010. Well Testing in Tight Gas Reservoir: Today. Presented at the SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, Mumbai, India, 20-22 January. SPE-129032-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/129032-MS.
Shahamat, M. S. and Aguilera, R. 2008. Pressure-Transient Test Design in Dual-Porosity Tight Gas Formations. Presented at the CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 16-19 June. SPE-115001-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/115001-MS.
Soliman, M. Y., Hunt, J. L., and Azari, M. 1996. Fracturing Horizontal Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE Mid-Continent Gas Symposium, Amarillo, Texas USA, 28-30 April. SPE-35260-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/35260-MS.
Soliman, M. Y. and Azari, M. 1998. Effect of Friction and Leak-off on Fracture Parameters Calculated from Hydraulic Impedance Testing. Presented at the SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, New Delhi, India, 17-19 February. SPE-39529-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/39529-MS.
Soliman, M. Y., Hunt, J. L., and Azari, M. 1999. Fracturing Horizontal Wells in Gas Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Fac 14 (4): 277-283. SPE-59096-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/59096-PA.
Soliman, M. Y., Azari, M., Ansah, J.et al. 2004. Design, Interpretation, and Assessment of Short-Term Pressure-Transient Tests. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 26-29 September. SPE-90837-MS. https://doi.org10.2118/90837-MS.